Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

The danger of trans fats

Dariush Mozaffarian, is a professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health.

by Dariush Mozaffarian

Trans fats are unsaturated fatty acids with at least one double bond in the trans configuration. While small amounts of trans fats are naturally present in meats and dairy products from cows, sheep, and other ruminants, the great majority of trans fats in our diet are industrially-produced, contained in foods made with partially hydrogenated vegetable oils. Partial hydrogenation, which converts vegetable oils into semi-solid fats for use in margarines, commercial cooking, and manufacturing processes, converts approximately 30% of the natural fats to trans fats. In the US, consumption of trans fats averages between 2-4% of total energy, with major sources being deep fried fast foods, bakery products (cakes, cookies, muffins, pies, etc), packaged snack foods, margarines, and breads.

Considerable evidence exists for harmful effects of trans fat intake. Furthermore, trans fats from partially hydrogenated oils have no intrinsic health value. Thus, little justification can be made for the use of partially hydrogenated oils, compared with other natural oils or fats. Importantly, adverse effects are seen at very low intakes: for example, 1-3% of total energy, or approximately 2-7 grams (20-60 calories) for a person consuming 2000 calories/day. Thus, complete or near-complete avoidance of industrial trans fats (≤0.5% of energy) may be necessary to avoid adverse effects and minimize health risks.

In 2004, Denmark became the first country to legislate limits on trans fat content of foods, largely eliminating industrial trans fats from all foods (including restaurants) in that country. Canada is considering similar legislation, and the city of Chicago is also considering banning industrial trans fats from restaurants. If restaurants and food manufacturers will not voluntarily eliminate trans fats (as has largely been done in the Netherlands), several points validate the need for, and the importance, of legislative measures to reduce the consumption of trans fats:

1. The harmful health effects of trans fats are now better established than for nearly any other substance in our food supply. The strength of evidence and the potential magnitude of harm greatly exceed those of food contaminants or pesticide residues, which are appropriately regulated to very low levels.

2. Extremely low levels of trans fat intake are associated with significantly increased risk of heart disease. In our analysis of prospective studies totaling 140,000 men and women, we determined that intake of 2% of total calories from trans fats (or 40 calories/day, for a typical 2000 calorie/day diet) was associated with 23% higher risk of heart attacks or death from heart disease. This indicates that for every 100,000 individuals suffering a heart attack or death from heart disease each year, 19,000 of these would be prevented if the average trans fat intake were reduced by approximately 40 calories/day.

3. Individuals have no means of evaluating the trans fat content of meals in restaurants. In contrast to packaged foods which now have standardized labeling of trans fat content, it is impossible for an individual to determine how much trans fat is present in restaurant meals. Mandated standardized labeling of all restaurant meals would be neither practical nor cost-efficient, given the ever-changing menus and diverse mixtures of ingredients of meals served in restaurants.

4. Use of trans fats in food manufacturing and restaurants can be limited without any significant effects on food taste, cost, or availability. While industry often expresses concern that limiting the use of trans fats will affect food taste or cost, no evidence exists to support this hypothesis. Conversely, substantial evidence exists that use of trans fats can be eliminated almost entirely without any effects on food taste, cost, or availability. This has been clearly demonstrated in both Denmark and the Netherlands.

It should also be emphasised that much less is known about trans fat consumption in developing countries. The current evidence suggests that, compared with Western nations, the intake of trans fats from partially hydrogenated oils may be much higher in developing countries, typically because partially hydrogenated oils represent the cheapest (and often subsidised) choice of fat for cooking. Given that coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in nearly all countries, including developing nations, intensive efforts must be undertaken to greatly reduce or eliminate use of partially hydrogenated oils in both the developed and the developing world.

In summary, considerable evidence exists for harm, and little evidence for intrinsic health value, of consumption of trans fats from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils. Elimination of industrial trans fats from foods, either by voluntary or legislative measures, would likely prevent tens of thousands of heart attacks each year in the U.S. and other countries.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2006.
www.project-syndicate.org
left
right
[ category: ]
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

how to eat out ethically?

I have a friend who has been talking about this issue for a while so it's good to see this piece. Can't help thinking that the list of those foods with high transfat content would be much much longer and Tony's list almost makes one complacent.

On the subject of  labelling, it was good to see the Country Women's Association conference call for country of origin food labelling. I went into a fish and chip shop the other day and on the ice they had fish from Taiwan, Thailand, Tanzania, South Africa, New Zealand etc but nothing local. I left with two potato scallops - that had probably been deep-fried in cheap oil with lots of transfat. It's hard to eat out ethically!

food labelling disgrace

Thanks Trevor for those links. Food labelling in Australia has long been amongst the worst in the developed world, with the industry having to be dragged kicking and screaming to the label each time.

This is not the farmers' fault but rather is a political product of one of Australia's biggest and oldest industries, food processing. While living in a bountiful country Australian's have been living for most of their history on sub-standard nutrition produced by this industry. Somewhat relevent to city food supplies before refrigeration became widespread and transport modernised they have hung on like a canker ever since. Like the carbon and other extractive industries in Australia they have normally been able to get government to protect them ahead of the interests of ordinary Australians.

GM labelling was the most recent fiasco. While asserting GM food was not harmful the government and industry also excused themselves from having to reveal whether GM food was being used or not in food products. This, it was claimed, was too difficult and besides the public obviously couldn't be trusted to make up it's own mind.

For the record here is a list, in descending order of danger, of foods sold in Australia that a Choice survey in 2005 found would not meet the minimums for transfat content enforced in Denmark.

 The link to the article is here

  • HUNGRY JACK’S Whopper and Regular Fries
  • MANNA Pastry From Heaven Oyster Cases
  • HERBERT ADAMS Traditional Pasties
  • ERICA’S KITCHEN Vol au Vents
  • PAMPAS Shortcrust Pastry
  • McDONALD’S McNuggets (six pieces) and Medium Fries
  • McDONALD’S Big Mac and Medium Fries
  • SARGENTS Party Sausage Rolls
  • HOME BRAND Croissants
  • FOUR ‘N TWENTY Traditional Meat Pie
  • SARA LEE Snack Quiche Lorraine
  • NUTELLA Hazelnut Spread
  • RITZ Cheese Crackers
  • COLES SAVINGS Croissants
  • BALFOURS Giant Sausage Roll
  • BURNS & RICKER Bagel Crisps
  • WOOLWORTHS Fresh Caramel Slice
  • PODS With Snickers

Perhaps we need to be a bit civic minded and should go around sticking labels of our own on all suspicious food in supermarkets ("Warning this food could contain poisons that will substantially reduce your life expectancy") until proper reporting is adopted. Readers of the blog with a background in nutrition might like to start contributing the names of food we should reasonably stay away from until we know more. Presumably biscuits of all kinds would be a starter. Any reply Mr Arnotts?

Thanks Tony and yes, worth a try.

Tony, thanks for the list. The most recent serious question over food labelling was in relation to the labelling of free range eggs, which I drew attention to on the Ethics of Eating Post.

There are large battery farms which got on the profit wagon of free range eggs by converting some of their production to free range. So you can see the potential for misleading labelling. Questions are now being raised as to how the number of free range eggs on sale could possibly be layed by the number of free range hens and claims have now been made that some 200 000 per week so called and more expensive free range eggs, were actually from cage housed hens. Now given that the cage producers always claimed that it was much cheaper to produce eggs by the cage method, and hence justify the higher price of their free range lines, one can see the potential fraud in any popping of cage eggs into the free range cartons.

The amount of money involved is estimated to be some 13 million a year. If the claims prove to be true that is fraud, pure and simple.

This matter is now being officially investigated. I said to Ian when this story broke, I wonder if there will be less free range eggs on the suipermarket shelves this week. I went down that week, and hardly a carton to  be found from the usual big joint cage/free producers!  Supply problem of some kind?

I now only buy such eggs as Eco eggs. More expensive but guranteed and certified to be from registered free range producers.

I will stick your list up on my wall. If you know any other products then let us all know. With obesity such an issue, proper food labellling is going to be a so important, we all have to vote with our wallets where we can. So folks, for a start you can demand the check out chick/lad call management and ask same to prove the eggs are what they say they are and mention this issue. Feedback feedback feedback. If you say nothing, ask nothing, then expect you may be being had. Be a nuisance. I once stood in the line of the fast check out and at the top of my voice informed all those with meat in their basket that the steaks they were buying at $12 each returned less than a dollar to the farmer and they should demand to know why they were being ripped off. Caused a bit of a stir.

I have been intending to stick up a notice every time I shop as I pass by the egg shelves to warn people about the egg issue. I will try it next week and see how long it stays there. Will report back!

In the Medical Journal of Australia

There is a letter, Trans fats in Australian fast foods, and an important leading article.

From Nutrition surveys or surveillance: one-night stands or a long-term commitment?, by Karen L Webb, Ingrid H Rutishauser, Geoffrey C Marks, Gregory Masters and Stephen R Leeder:

Australia is unusual among its peers for not having continuous nutrition intelligence.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2006, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.