Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
sidebar-top content-top


This is Trevor Kerr's second piece for Webdiary. His first was A desalination plant for Wonthaggi? Thank you, Trevor for raising some important - and controversial - matters.

In $100m to break through waiting lists the suggestion is made that Labor will move to open some surgical waiting lists in public hospitals to contracts (presumably via competitive tendering) from private hospitals. I wonder if service providers in New Zealand, Singapore and Mumbai will be able to bid? Be warned, though, this little hypothetical will end up with a strong set of arguments for a National Identifier.

The business of private (for profit) facilities is very different from fully subsidised health care. If private hospitals are going to bid for public work, it could be instructive to consider how they function. So, let's take a fictitious surgical clinic somewhere in the Gulf States. This facility was built inside one of the hotels for the super-rich, specifically to cater for a small range of surgery. The Gulf State Orthopedics clinic specialises in joint replacements. At the outset, the owners of GSO knew very well the nature of the clientele from which they would draw their business. Staff are recruited from anywhere and the surgeons can make as much there in a two week contract as they would in three months at a UK hospital.

Apart from creature comforts, clients expect the highest quality treatment and perfect outcomes. They also require tight security. But while clients have to leave their passports at the desk, there are no other identity checks. It is well known that people can book in under assumed names. At reception, each new client submits to a range of biometric measures, including fingerprinting and iris scans. They also deposit a sample of blood for the DNA bank, in case there is a tragedy and identities have to proven. They are then issued with small radio-emitting trackers that are worn on the wrist at all times: these are needed for access to the areas that require authorisation. All of the staff are tracked electronically and have undergone rigorous, pre-employment proofs of identity (see A European identity card for health professionals) and police checks in their countries of origin.

On discharge every client is issued with printed summaries of all results and procedures. They are also given a DVD which has all data in common readable electronic format for easy transfer to databases at home. The disc also contains relevant images and the CVs and contact numbers of the principal medical personnel on their case.
The original clinic, the GSO, has been so successful that competitors have sprung up to cater for the rich and powerful who cannot trust the competence or the security of their own state's facilities. The competition for big money is intense, so comparators are used in the advertising brochures. Since Quality and Safety feature highly in the mission statements of the clinics, and some prospective clients have doubts about institutional self-promotion, an independent international auditor has been established. The best clinics submit verifiable data on quality and safety, and the rankings are freely available. These are add-on costs to the consumer, initially, but the competitive culture drives the search for continuous improvements and innovations that cut costs while lifting Q&S standards.

The common thread in this, all of which should be transferable to the publicly funded sector, is sharing of data. One way of critiquing the current situation of health data in Australia is to try and imagine how far we will be behind Singapore in 10 years, after they have their superfast broadband (Race on to build ultra-fast broadband). We can use the example of the Labor government's plan for preventing obesity in childhood, a Weight check at four years. Where will this data be held, who will have access to it and how will it be integrated with other data that has been collected, such as immunisations?

At the root of all questions about health informatics is the ability to assign data with supreme and incorruptible accuracy to the correct individual. In order to cut short any notion that the Medicare Number fulfils the criteria as an identifier, see the glossary at Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Medicare card number identifier N(11) - "As a person can be identified on more than one Medicare card this is not a unique identifier for a person." In regard to information held by governments on children, there have been notable problems. From Data integrity in the Child Support Agency (pdf):

12. While relatively few in number compared to the entire record set, the presence of erroneous records in the database indicates a weakness in effective control systems for data entry and recording. The CSA has recently introduced a Data Quality Improvement Programme, including a series of activities designed to test specific aspects of data quality in Cuba. The CSA will benefit from extending this programme to incorporate a comprehensive check of the application of all relevant business rules within the database.
13. Furthermore, the CSA should draw on the findings of this audit, and the information obtained through its Data Quality Improvement Programme, to identify and address weaknesses in data quality control systems. The inclusion of some controls should be relatively straightforward—such as a technical level control to ensure that an ‘end date’ does not precede a ‘start date’, within a line of data. Other controls, such as enforcing a standardised approach to recording names and addresses, may present more of a challenge, yet are essential to improving the overall quality of customer data in Cuba.
14. Most of the errors and weaknesses identified in this audit pose a minimal risk to the CSA’s overall administration of the Child Support Scheme. However, particular errors or anomalies on individual records can result in an inaccurate calculation of child support liability. For the families involved, the effects can be significant. One of the objectives of the Child Support Scheme is that ‘parents share in the cost of supporting their children according to their capacity’. Incorrect child support liability calculations, resulting from errors on customer records, pose a risk to the achievement of this objective. 

The UK has, or has had, more than one scheme to keep records of every child. In Children’s database delayed to review security:

The security review follows the news last week of a security failure by HM Revenue and Customs (HRMC) on child benefit data, resulting in the loss of two discs containing the personal details of 25m UK citizens, including bank details and addresses.

From the US, (in Harvard Study Confirms LMN Conjecture):

Our findings raise concerns about the ability of the current approach to achieve widespread electronic clinical data exchange.

Also in the US, from Veterans Affairs Healthcare:

Experts generally agree that electronic records are absolutely essential to significant health care reform. However, only about 5 percent of the nation's hospitals now have them. That means, for example, that in most private hospitals 20 percent of lab tests are repeated simply because doctors can't find a patient's results.

How is pathology in Australia? Do we have a national provider? No. There are many, both private and public, and each more or less restricted in scope and access. They do not communicate with each other, and send only limited subsets of data out to bodies like Medicare. Symbion's latest advertisement for their pathology section claims "our national network of pathology providers", but each of its individual laboratories is a discrete entity. There is no exchange of data, so that a client at Symbion's Melbourne branch would have to take his results on paper if he moved to Sydney. One of the results of this self-imposed insulation is that a lot of repeat testing goes on, which is not a bad thing for a business taking profit from transactions.

The pathology business is complex, but the current negotiations between Symbion, Healthscope and Primary seem to be overlooking one of the critical aspects. This is the matter of information systems. Pathology has been computerised for decades, and every practice stores millions of individual laboratory results. These databanks are important for tracking a person's health over time, and the aggregated data have immense value for public health and for research into new pharmaceuticals. However, each pathology company locks away its data so that they cannot be compared easily with the values in another provider's computer system.

Suppose my GP sent me to spend a few days in a major teaching hospital for an acute medical condition. One would think that, in 2007, I would be able to carry an electronic summary of my test results and the specialists' conclusions with me when I went home. Or, it ought to be possible for each and every one of my chosen health care providers to get access to the information, the hard facts, via the Internet. None of this happens, though.

Taking a simpler example, suppose I have a chronic condition like diabetes and I have had all of my tests done with the same pathology provider. If I am referred to a specialist, and more tests are done with a different pathology company, will all of my results become available on my GP's computer? Or, if I travel interstate, and have tests done by another pathology provider who is part of the same corporate empire, will any of my doctors be able to view all of my results in sequence so they can be compared? Not likely.

I am willing to guess, in the case of likely mergers or buy-outs between the pathology elements of Symbion, Healthscope and Primary, that it is impossible to merge the laboratory databanks without risk of loss or corruption and without huge expense. All parties involved in the negotiations, not least the shareholders, ought to be asking how they can get an objective analysis of the implications. Further than that, several national regulatory bodies ought to be looking very closely at what impact the deals may have on the integrity of essential health data. That integrity rests on the creation of a National Identifier; there is a risk that further consolidation of health records into non-standard, proprietary formats will hinder the process of standardisation. That is, if major pathology providers who own and maintain vast collections of data are occupied in pursuing their own business goals, they will not be inclined to devote their own resources to collaboration on the national electronic health record project. NEHTA (National E-Health Transition Authority) was set up as an incorporated body during the previous government, and its status under Labor is probably under review.

Since Labor took over, we have gone from Labor swift to dump Access Card to Rebirth of the Access Card?:

Labor kept its election promise by scrapping the controversial $1.1 billion program. The card was intended to provide every Australian with a unique health and welfare number and biometric photo on a smartcard. Mr Hayes said while the Coalition went too far with the Access Card, he believes Labor would, in future, have to introduce a more secure way for people and the federal Government to access e-health records.

A national identity management program will be expensive, and not only because of the bandwidth required to disperse it all over the country. A research paper on the subject, Identity management in the UK public sector to 2011, costs nearly one thousand pounds to purchase. Singapore has just announced a radical departure from previous models of access to information (Singapore split a lesson to Telstra) including catering for telemedicine. That last point is vital, because health professionals will need real-time, high quality video to be able to take part in remote consultations. 

In summary, e-health requires both a national identification scheme (for patients, clients and service providers) and superfast broadband. More important, though, is the need for oversight from a government commission charged to preserve the public interest against the ravages of commercial cartels.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Annual Health Congress

Text of letter to a national daily (not published):

Experts in the aeronautical industry have come forward, readily, to talk about the recent crash-landing at Heathrow airport. This healthy attitude is in sharp contrast to discussions of safety in health care. We are told that errors occur often in the practice of medicine, while we are also being told we ought to be paying more for innovative technological solutions to illness. But technology brings with it the added costs of failures and errors at the human-machine interface. Technological failures, in pills or procedures, are more likely to occur on a larger scale, as health care is becoming more of a global, commercial enterprise. Air transport has followed a similar path, in some respects, but that industry uses technology to create fool-proof operational pathways.

The air transport industry knows that it must be honest, open and transparent about safety if it is to retain the confidence of the public. Pilots and crew focus their energies and insight on safety for the obvious reason that their lives are at stake, too. Why are surgeons so reluctant to talk about mistakes in their industry? One reason could be that their immediate welfare is not at risk in the surgical suite. Another may be that the national body that should take the lead in safety, the Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care, is almost silent. For instance, Mr Geoff Davies wrote an article on safety in our hospitals ('Patients risk death in sick hospitals', 16/1) without once mentioning the role of the Commission.

This issue is an essential part of the framework the Labor governments will use to allocate resources in health care. Without acknowledgement and accurate measurement of mistakes and errors, planning in many respects will be hit or miss. At present, it seems the public is being wilfully deprived of the tools and data it needs to make sensible decisions about the delivery of services in health care. 

Australian Financial Review is hosting the 10th Annual Health Congress in Sydney, Feb 27-29. The Conference program includes 'Charting the safety and quality of Australian Healthcare', but the agenda item is being led by someone from Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. There is not a peep from ACSQHC, so perhaps the steep ticket prices put them off.

E-Health is being discussed at several sessions.  It would be illuminating if the first speaker to address electronic health records asked the audience if any of them were keeping accurate records, in any format, of their health encounters.

Centro - Not healthy

Have you looked at your super statement in the few days? It looks ugly, isn't it. I heard something incredible. It was the CEO of Centro being interviewed on AM and he said that Centro is having trouble securing new debts to pay the old loans. Hang-on, I thought you are supposed to pay off your debts by your earnings and incomes, not by borrowing. Must be a new MBA economic theory.

According to Stephen Mayne in Crikey today:

9/8/07 - Centro Properties Group released this profit statement on 9 August, you’ll see a table claiming it had no current interest-bearing liabilities and $3.6 billion of non-current debt.

18/9/07 - This changed on September 18 when the annual report was released and page 34 disclosed $1.1 billion of current interest bearing liabilities and $2.5 billion of longer term debt.

17/12/07 - Contrast that with page 19 of this presentation yesterday which revealed the following debt maturity profile for the parent company: Two months: $2.7 billion, 12 months: $1.2 billion and More than 12 months: $2.8 billion.

No wonder Centro is F*@#$.




Pawned by Telstra

Not sure if we came to the same conclusions as Healing by broadband:

"At some point in the future, all health records will be connected at every point in the supply chain," Shiff says. "But necessity is the mother of invention. You don't have to wait for technology nirvana. You need to support what is happening now and connect the dots. The integration can occur in pockets while you constructing the overall architecture of e-health."

Maybe I should have consulted Testra Business, and raised a finger of objection while they rammed that very nice lunch down my throat. Anyway, that's it for the finer points, folks, Nicole's agent is beating on my door, and she has a new movie to promote.  

Trust is the issue

If we could trust the bastards with the information I'd be all in favour.

The appalling behaviour of Centrelink and DEWR shows we can't.

The kid and The Orang Utans

"THE father of a Sydney boy with cerebral palsy claims his son was used for an election stunt by former prime minister John Howard....Mr Howard paid a visit to the Terrey Hills home of 11-year-old Daniel Clarke on November 5, in the midst of the election campaign, to announce funds to save endangered orang-utans in Borneo and Sumatra.... Daniel's father, Rodney Clarke, 40, said he has now been informed the $200,000 is no longer going ahead because it was an election promise".


 They did say he would do anything to win the election.

Simian slip?

Tsk, tsk, PF, to suggest any of our governments would offer us plastic instead of the real thing. 

My favourite source of medical informania is Radiotherapy on 3RRR. One of them talked about Consumer International's Drugs, Doctors and Dinners report (pdf download) today, so I pass on the link since folks at Healthy Skepticism were involved.

The correct response to a claim made between 6.30 and 7pm that any medical service costs $$$ is "Says who?"  This applies to private health insurance, too. Labor is over a barrel on the 30% PHI rebate, and in this position can only give lip service to calls for rationalisation based on openness and transparency. Don't be surprised if an internal crisis boils up in Labor's belly before they have been at the wheel for six months. Kevin Rudd is a great believer in the 'happy face', so don't expect to see too much of Nicola Roxon's pain on the evening news.

He'll Pay From His Own Pocket, PFJ!

I'm sure our John will happily hand over the $200,000 himself rather than appear to be an opportunistic Indian-giver, PFJ.

And if he doesn't, there are enough climate-change denying Howard-lovers on Webdiary who'll willingly contribute the money themselves to keep His legacy alive!


They Love ID Cards

For some bizarre reason governments of all persuasions just love to gather information upon us. An ID card, in whatever form, that is introduced for any reason, whether benign or sinister, seems to be yet another of those wacky schemes that bureaucrats must get into the ears of pollies and tell them that it will help speed up help in areas such as delivery of health services.

We've seen recently that the great gathering of information on social security recipients - and not just those on unemployment, but everyone who gets a government benefit - has led to a complete abuse of the system where those overpaid at the fault of the DHSS have been pursued relentlessly but at a vast cost to the taxpayer, way in excess of the money it recoups.

I always knew that over the past three years that when those horrendous tabloid TV shows inflicted upon us after the nightly news carried "dole cheat" stories repeatedly and then an interview from some fat slug from the department who informed us in menacing tones (difficult as he had a rather campish voice) that those "cheats" would be pursued until the cows came home, it would end in tears.

As many writers have said, if only tax cheats, including corporate, were chased so diligently it would produce a bonanza in the billions of dollars.

(It's high time those shows were brought to heel by a regulator for simply producing "news" based upon press releases, whether a private firm flogging a new diet or a government department, and  then having the temerity to sandwich adverts between them.)

But any attempts to introduce an integrated information system - especially if the private sector gets involved - are doomed for failure as Nu Labour in the UK has shown. Not only is it costing billions of taxpayer pounds there for computerised health care systems that repeatedly fail or just aren't up and running yet, years after promised, the poor old taxpayer is slugged year after year on the fanciful notion that private corporations can do it better and cheaper. They simply don't.

Nu Labour under Blair and now his chief henchman Gordon Brown has been a disaster for the UK. Following a few years of "sleaze' under the man Howard says he would most like to emulate, John Major (and will probably, ie. be forgotten) the Blair government refined sleaze to new levels and ramped up Thatcherism. It's hoped that a Rudd government learns from this.


Need to read this again, but initial response is one of suspicion.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2005-2011, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Recent Comments

David Roffey: {whimper} in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Jenny Hume: So long mate in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Fiona Reynolds: Reds (under beds?) in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Justin Obodie: Why not, with a bang? in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Dear Albatross in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Michael Talbot-Wilson: Good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Goodnight and good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 5 days ago
Margo Kingston: bye, babe in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 1 day ago