Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
sidebar-top content-top

Painting Obama as an enemy will hurt Israel badly

Sol Salbe writes:

The best indication I have seen so far that the US is slowly beginning to be perceived as the enemy in Israel has been in the writing of Australian expatriate Isi Leibler who expounded on The case against Obama. Leibler is hard-liner but he cannot but he is not in the same league as Obama’s other critics like Anne Bayefsky. The Obama White House is certainly scaring the Israeli right. Dan Fleshler highlighted a good reason when he wrote:

Am I the only one who finds significance in a new p-word used by the State Department: “premature?”

Asked at a press briefing if the U.S. was considering putting financial pressure on Israel to get it to comply with American demands, State Department spokesperson Richard Wood said, “It’s premature to talk about that. What we’re trying to do is to create an environment which makes it conducive for talks to go forward.”

It is impossible for an event or action to be “premature” unless there is a chance that it will happen. In other words, this was close to a public admission that financial and other sanctions are in the Obama administration’s tool kit…It might have been a poor choice of words. Or it might have been the strongest signal yet that this American administration is not willing to put up with business-as-usual from the Israelis. As any parent knows, the most effective punishment is one you hold in abeyance, hoping you never have to use it…

We sure live in interesting times.

Painting Obama as an enemy will hurt Israel badly
by Zvi Bar'el

In light of the public brawling between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama, we can expect to start seeing graffiti saying things like "America, get out," "Obama is an Arab" and "Neither a broker nor honest."

In the new Israeli debate, America is slowly beginning to be perceived as an enemy - and the dispute is going personal: Our prime minister versus their president. Yesterday, he simply demanded that Israel adopt the two-state solution, then called for a freeze on construction in the settlements (without agreeing to settle for "only" the completion of projects already underway), and now he wants to divide Jerusalem. Not Netanyahu - Obama.

The tension already prodded U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton into making a hasty declaration that the United States is placing similar pressure on the Arabs. Washington, too, it would seem, has been infected by the terror of the Israeli right, which seeks to portray it as a pro-Arab, Muslim-loving, aggressive intruder jeopardizing the Zionist enterprise in the territories. And how can we continue to believe the American promise to guarantee Israel's security when every day new headlines trumpet yet another dispute between the White House and Jerusalem?

To back up its claims, the right points to a long list of U.S. foreign-policy failures: the desire to open a channel of dialogue with Iran; the lifting of the boycott on Syria; the willingness to permit Hamas to take part in the peace process, albeit with restrictions; and, of course, the pressure on Israel regarding the settlements and Jerusalem. The right is using this distorted balance sheet, in which Israel is purportedly being asked to give "everything" and the Arabs "nothing," to present the Israeli public with a paradigm in which being "for Obama" means being anti-Zionist, and being against the settlements means being for Obama. A vicious circle in which images replace facts and slogans stand in for policy.

The equation should be familiar to Israelis. Before January it was the sole province of the Arabs in general and the Palestinians in particular. They were the ones who viewed America as the enemy, and former president George W. Bush as a representative of right-wing Zionism. They were the ones who claimed the United States demanded "everything" from them and "nothing" from Israel. As such, being a Palestinian nationalist meant being first of all anti-American.

Since the roles are now reversed and the Palestinians see Obama as their savior, the Israeli right is rushing in to adopt the Palestinian equation. The right doesn't have to persuade the public to support the settlements or the eternal unity of Jerusalem; in fact it no longer has to sell any ideology at all. It's enough to paint Obama as an enemy, or at least as a suspicious object, to create the holy hostile unity. The task is a relatively easy one, especially vis-a-vis the U.S. administration, which is no longer willing to use vague expressions to achieve foreign policy goals.

But the implications of this anti-Americanism are much more dire than the dismantling of a settlement, or even than serious damage to the peace process. It could put Israel in the same pit as the tiny number of states that have sought to oppose the United States.

The remedy lies in reviewing the facts. Obama did not invent a new American policy. The United States has long held that the settlements are illegal; the same is true for the status of East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. The Americans are sticking to the same road map drawn up seven years ago, it's just that Israel apparently didn't notice that the Palestinians have fulfilled the first article in the document almost completely. Military action against Israel has stopped, even from the Gaza Strip, and an increasingly effective Palestinian force in the West Bank is taking action against terror organizations. Israel, in contrast, has not met its road map obligations and continues to argue over the terms of the agreement - as if it never adopted it. Nor can Israel rely on its demand that the Arab states normalize relations with Jerusalem: The obligation of normalization is conditioned on Israel's withdrawal from all occupied territory.

There is one thing, however, that the United States has changed: its diplomatic behavior, and its tone. But it is truly difficult to complain about someone no longer willing to stand for the verbal contortions and the lies that Israel has been feeding Washington.

[ category: ]

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The lies from Hamas just never stop

Marilyn, hi!

You've been following events in Gaza pretty closely. Did you see this linked from the front page of the SBS World News website today?

Clarification - Gaza

On April 23 2009, World News Australia ran a story on Israel's inquiry into its actions during its conflict with Hamas in Gaza in late 2008 and early 2009, including the line "One attack on a United Nations school drew international condemnation and allegations of war crimes."

This should have read: "Israeli shelling near a United Nations school drew international condemnation and allegations of war crimes, although original reports that the school was directly targeted were later shown to be incorrect."

It just never stops, does it?


No-one in Hamas or anywhere else said the school was targetted. Chris Gunness of the UN and John Ging both said it was "outside the school grounds where hundreds of people where sheltering".

Sitting on his front porch

Yeah, right.

Here's a "peace" group eagerly spreading the lies, and even trying to stifle explanations about what actually happened.

You will note it accuses the Israelis of accusing "Hamas of deliberately exaggerating the death toll in the suddenly-accidental attack on the school."

So, clearly, Hamas said the school was targetted. Andf the "peace" activist Hamas spokespersons in the West sent the lie on.

But of course, now they deny this. A bit like they "never" said there was a "massacre at Janin".

A really cute example of how the Islamist Lobby spreads its lie on SBS last night.

A BBC reporter interviews a Palestinian child soldier "tortured" by Israelis.

Not a word about why the Hamas thugs use child soldiers, why they use retarded kids as remote detonated bomb couriers, why they attack Israeli kids with bombs and rockets.

Just some Palestinian kid sitting on his front porch and giving a chipper account of his "torture" by the Israelis.

The "peace" movement abet Hamas in such lies all the time.

Lords of the land

Eldar and Zertal's book Lords of the land is a brutal reality check for those in the world outside Israel who continue to support what they know is illegal colonising of Palestine.

Gershom Gorenberg's Accidental empire gives the dates and time the Israeli's knew the settlements were illegal but he made it all sound so benign.

The Jews of Israel and their supporters in the diaspora have had since 13 June 1967 to get out of the occupied Palestinian territory.

It's about time someone really made them either do it or take down the exclusionist apartheid wall and lived with the neighbours.

After all, the European Jews are the squatters, not the Palestinians.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2005-2011, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Recent Comments

David Roffey: {whimper} in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 4 days ago
Jenny Hume: So long mate in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 5 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Reds (under beds?) in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 49 min ago
Justin Obodie: Why not, with a bang? in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 1 hour ago
Fiona Reynolds: Dear Albatross in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 1 hour ago
Michael Talbot-Wilson: Good luck in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 6 hours ago
Fiona Reynolds: Goodnight and good luck in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 1 day ago
Margo Kingston: bye, babe in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 5 days ago