Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
sidebar-top content-top

GM as parable, and Israel's sudden choice: Obama or Kahane

Sol Salbe writes:

For several months now I have been arguing that the changes in the Israel/Palestine situation over 2008-2009 have been of a similar magnitude to the other big changes of 1917, 1947-49 and 1967. Those whose political outlook is stuck in the mode of no changes may find themselves reading the political map incorrectly.

But on this occasion it is Bradley Burston, whose column in the English edition of Haaretz is not as a rule translated into Hebrew, who highlights the point. If a company like General Motors can be allowed to go bankrupt then there is a big question mark about US unreserved support to Israel regardless of its actions. One does not have to share Burston’s world view to follow his logic.

GM as parable, and Israel's sudden choice: Obama or Kahane
by Bradley Burston

Even in Israel, the bankruptcy of General Motors has much to teach.

In fact, it seems oddly fitting that a month which may recast the direction of the Middle East, and of the future of Israel [see below], opened with an event which until recently would have redefined the unthinkable: an African American president of the United States discussing the impact of the collapse of what was once the world's largest company, and warning that it would take "a painful toll on many Americans."

The bankruptcy of General Motors bears a number of lessons Israelis would be well advised to consider, especially in view of Barack Obama's imminent overture to the Muslims of the region.

One has directly to do with a society's most fundamental and protected of sacred cows, in Israel's case the settlements and their outlaw spinoffs: Sacred does not mean immortal. Nor, in an atmosphere of moral bankruptcy, does sacred necessarily mean moral.

Another lesson is this: Choices which may have for decades seemed indefinitely far in the future, may suddenly and unavoidably become the province of the here and now.

And one more, for the settlers, especially: Do not underestimate Barack Obama. If the untouchable General Motors has been toppled, can the sacred cow of unfettered settlement be far behind?

For Israel, the choice of paths is becoming clearer by the day. There is the way being pointed by Obama, characterized by an intensive search for creative ways in which the main players in the conflict are to receive long-desired benefits in return for sacrificing certain - often self-destructive - policy platforms and practices.

The other choice, it develops, is that of Rabbi Meir Kahane, the man who first embodied what might be called the disgracist strain of hardline Israeli politics: In all things, act and speak so as to belittle, besmirch, and disgrace Israeli Arabs, Palestinian Arabs, and Muslims in general, couching all of it in the baldfacedly bogus guise of an imperative of Jewish law or in Orwellian demands for Stalin-worthy fealty to a theoretical, on-the-books reality.

In recent weeks, we have seen the hideous markers of the Kahane approach, notably in the legislative proposals highlighting Jewish insecurity over the "Jewish Zionist" future of Israel, and a we-have-much-to-hide attitude toward the circumstances of Israel's birth. Kahane's legacy is even more evident in the current eruption of violence in settler outposts, with masked Jewish youths hurling stones and other objects at passing Palestinian motorists. We have watched these "most excellent of our youth" as they fight Israeli police and soldiers who have the temerity to enforce Israeli law and are thus routinely branded as Nazis by the pro-outpost hoodlums.

Disgracism, as an ideology, extols the settler hotheads' and rabid rightist rabbis' brand of abject disloyalty to strictures imposed by the state, even as it condemns Israeli Arabs for suggesting that members of a minority should be able to simultaneously hold both citizenship and their own opinions.

In the end, the disgrace shown the Arabs does deep disgrace to the perpetrator, but, more importantly, does the deepest disgrace of all to the State of Israel.

At the same time, we have seen the indications of an effort to stem the tide of unfettered and illegal settlement in the West Bank. This, despite the blackmail of religious and right-wing politicians, who brandish the third-act pistol of coalition demolition every time they take an oath to support a new government.

The most applicable lesson of GM's fall might be gleaned from studying perhaps the most honored misquote in history. Until now, the settlers and their supporters have insisted by word and deed that what is good for settlement is good for the State of Israel.

But the original quote bears repeating. In 1953, facing a Senate hearing over his nomination for secretary of defense, then-General Motors president Charles Wilson came in for questioning over the large amounts of GM stock he owned. Given his investments, he was asked, could he make a decision as defense secretary that would hurt the company?

"I cannot conceive of one, because for years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors and vice versa. The difference did not exist. Our company is too big. It goes with the welfare of the country."

Wilson, it should be underscored, sold his shares. It is time for extremist settlers and their blind supporters to sell theirs - to be willing to make sacrifices for the good of the country, rather than expecting the country to sacrifice itself for them.

A partial calendar of a potentially fateful month:

June 2: Civil defense exercise of unprecedented scope in Israel

Scenarios include of hundreds of missiles thundering into Tel Aviv, chemical warheads striking the north of the country. News of the exercise prompts neighboring Arab armies to go on alert.

June 3: Obama visits Saudi Arabia

The president is expected to ask Riyadh as well as moderate Gulf states for preliminary steps toward normalization of ties with Israel. The measures may include granting a limited number of business and perhaps tourist visas to Israelis, anchorage rights for Israeli vessels, mutual air space rights for Israeli and Arab airliners, and opening interest offices.

June 4: Obama, in Cairo, addresses the Muslim world

The speech will be closely watched, intended as it is to quell the seething enmity between the Bush administration and Muslims around the globe.

June 7: General elections in Lebanon

The strongly pro-Iranian and Syrian-allied Hezbollah could win the crucial contest, tilting the precarious balance of power in the Mideast.

June 12: Presidential elections in Iran

If incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wins a second term, he is seen as likely to leverage the victory into more authoritarianism at home and a clear endorsement of hardline foreign policies, in particular the drive for nuclear capability and upgraded intercontinental ballistic missiles, support for, and perhaps instigation of, proxy wars on Israel's borders with Gaza and Lebanon, as well as steps to undermine the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

Throughout the month: Outpost razings and the looming indictment of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman

Two severe tests of the resolve of the Netanyahu government. If Lieberman is brought to trial on a range of money-laundering and other charges, the nation's spearhead of disgracism would be blunted if not rendered moribund.

If the government can survive outpost removals, perhaps by trading rightists for the centrist Kadima, the peace process and Obama's new diplomacy will have a chance.

If not, elections in Israel will have to be added to the calendar in a few months' time.

[ category: ]

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A fair assessment

Well, it's a fair assessment on a number of levels.

Because if the US can allow its obsolete but at least in some sense productive but inefficient and corrupt banking and auto industries to finally slump after carrying these for some time already, maybe it will indeed find that another luxury level central symbol of Western iconography, Israel, surely has so much the more become finally too much to bear in terms of manifest financial let alone moral costs. The costs of walling off not just Palestine, but the entire Muslim world of which Palestine under America's proxy, Israel is just the visible microcosmic tip of the iceberg; of keeping a vast region under virtual armed guard for decades if not generations, are becoming just too much.

The Americans alienated an entire region and culture for their selfish plunder of resources, but also their painful and one-eyed support of their surrogate at any cost.

Although the US economy is actually predicated on war, one still wonders at the monumental costs in keeping countries under control by unpopular pro-US dictators, a long sequence of costly invasions including on garrisons thru consequent wars stemming from these ill-thought out invasions.

If the magnitude of American borrowings for Vietnam was the underlying factor in inducing the recession of the seventies, how likely is the consolidated squander for the Bush-Cheney years - unproductive wars, tax cuts for the rich and sponsorship for the white elephant Israel, contributed to the US's current problems, and those of the rest of the world that has to adjust to the US's spendthriftness.

With Israel, for the US, the problem is magnified by the ingrate behaviour of the spoilt brat. Not even an attempt at comprehension from Israel of what effect its brutality has on those subject to its recalcitrance and never the slightest indication that it might have to adjust to Palestinians (Iraqis, Afghanis etc,etc,) to even the slightest extent that these have had to adjust to Israel. As Pakistan proves, the Americans are in danger of losing their empire out of loyalty to Israel, but we must remember that Israel is as used by the US as the US is by it.

The axis is so close as to be symbiotic, but has hardened attitudes to the point that accommodations to reality seem impossible from Israel or the US and enemies consequently begin to abound who need not have been made, had even-handedness and flexibility been more the norm in the second half of the twentieth century, than hubris, brutality and arrogance.

Disgracism is a fine word for it

I watched the hard core nutjobs burning down the crops and trees in Palestine while calling Obama an anti-semitic criminal in the White House and I wanted to puke.

If Judah and Sumaria ever existed they are the districts near Babylon which is in Iraq and certainly have nothing to do with Palestine or European Jews.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2005-2011, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Recent Comments

David Roffey: {whimper} in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 2 days ago
Jenny Hume: So long mate in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Reds (under beds?) in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 5 days ago
Justin Obodie: Why not, with a bang? in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 5 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Dear Albatross in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 5 days ago
Michael Talbot-Wilson: Good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 5 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Goodnight and good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 6 days ago
Margo Kingston: bye, babe in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 3 days ago