Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
sidebar-top content-top

India's Illiterate Revolution

Arindam ChaudhuriArindam Chaudhuri is Honorary Dean at the Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) and Editor in Chief of Business Economy Magazine. His most recent books are Count your Chickens before they hatch and The Great Indian Dream.

by Arindam Chaudhuri

The United States has long been divided over what it calls "affirmative action," a system of racial preferences intended to overcome the lingering consequences of slavery and discrimination against black Americans. India is now becoming divided in much the same way, and for much the same reason – the emerging system of "reserved places" aimed at redressing centuries of caste discrimination. But India’s good intentions, like America’s affirmative action policies, are misguided.

The underlying question is whether merit as a criterion for advancement is doomed when legacies of racial and caste discrimination exist. Are those who agitate for affirmative action fighting for something that is more a quack remedy than a real solution?

In fact, India’s "reserved places" scheme operates as a deliberate smokescreen, for it allows the government cleverly to mask the real issue, which is access to primary education for India’s disadvantaged. Were adequate primary education available to India’s poor – or, for that matter, to America’s poor urban blacks – there would be no need for reserved places in higher education and elsewhere.

Indeed, any Indian able to read this article should consider himself lucky, because India’s politicians have succeeded in keeping a majority of the country’s population thoroughly illiterate (as well as poor and unhealthy). Instead of providing quality elementary education for all, our policymakers are more concerned with enacting caste-based measures aimed at short-term political gains.

Since India gained independence 58 years ago, billions of rupees have been doled out in numerous educational policies, but general primary education remains abysmal. According to a report released by the National Institute for Educational Planning Administration (NIEPA) in 2005, 8.1% of primary schools in India have no classrooms, while 17.5% have only one teacher. In addition, 76.2% of schools do not have clean drinking water, while 14.6% lack electricity. Less than 4% of all primary schools have computers.

Likewise, the Mumbai-based NGO Pratham’s Annual Status of Education Report 2005, which was prepared after a survey in 28 states and union territories, reveals that 35% of children in the 7-14 age group are unable to read simple paragraphs, while 41% failed to solve a simple two-digit subtraction problem or a division problem. Instead of preparing a pool of educated workers for the future, the government’s policies have given rise to an illiterate and innumerate population.

These findings raise damning suspicions about the literacy levels that successive Indian governments have claimed to achieve. If the state of primary education is this bad, will the disadvantaged classes ever stand a chance? Moreover, according to Vinod Raina, a member of the Central Advisory Board on Education (CABE), 80 million of India’s 200 million children between 6-14 years of age are not in school at all. Of the remaining 120 million, only 20 million are expected to reach the tenth year of school, with the rest dropping out along the way. Indeed, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recently expressed dismay over the fact that "only 47 out of 100 children enrolled in class I reach class VIII."

The government has pledged in its National Common Minimum Program to raise public expenditure on education to 6% of GDP. However, recent years have witnessed a steady decline in educational spending, from 4% of GDP in 2001-02 to 3.8% in 2002-04 and 3.5% in 2004-05.

Quality education is the single greatest asset that a nation can give to its people. It also happens to be the least expensive and most cost-effective support that government can provide. But Indian politicians’ interests appear to lie elsewhere. After all, with the rate of functional literacy at only 37.5%, they can easily manipulate the votes of uneducated people with alcohol, pop slogans, and intimidation.

So the protests by highly educated Indians against "reserved places" is not only wrongheaded, but dangerous as well. Unless India’s highly educated stand up for better schools for all, protests against caste preferences will only succeed in heightening tensions and selling newspapers, rather than improving the lives of India’s destitute.

The government is probably happy with these protests, for they divert attention from the real issue – the authorities’ utter failure to address the fundamental problem. As in America, the issue is not racial and class reservations and preferences, but ensuring high-quality primary education for all, rich and poor alike. As India’s educated revolt against preferences, they should not do so in a way that reinforces illiteracy.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2006.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thought provoking in some ways

Especially if one considers the Howard Government's policy of dumbing down the electorate, by making further education prohibitively expensive so only the offspring of business can afford it, without a lifetime of HECS debts to come afterwards.

Call me cynical but I can't help feeling that every move Howard and Cheney make in their lifelong lust for power costs someone down the socio/economic ladder, something. The humour that goes with it of course is that the poor sods who suffer the most are the same morons who voted for their mortgages, instead of voting for their future.

I know it doesn't address the direct grief expressed in Mr Chaudhuri's article, but let's face it, if we are going to pay for this stuff, we may as well read it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2005-2011, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Recent Comments

David Roffey: {whimper} in Not with a bang ... 12 weeks 6 days ago
Jenny Hume: So long mate in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 4 hours ago
Fiona Reynolds: Reds (under beds?) in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Justin Obodie: Why not, with a bang? in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Fiona Reynolds: Dear Albatross in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Michael Talbot-Wilson: Good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 2 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Goodnight and good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Margo Kingston: bye, babe in Not with a bang ... 14 weeks 4 hours ago