G'day. The Senate Inquiry into the terror laws [1] is open for business - submissions close on November 11. See here [2] for the guide on how to make a submission. See here [3] for the members of the committee with the job, the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee. I published the committee's unanimous report into the Government's 2002 terrorism laws at Liberalism fights back on terror laws [4].

Beware alarmist rubbish, says Beattie
SMH, 07 Nov 2005, By Cynthia Banhman and AAP
One of the premiers who backed the urgent passage of anti-terrorism laws has now accused the Federal Government of "alarmist rubbish" on national security.Queensland's Peter Beattie said a push to bolster the military's powers before next year's Commonwealth Games in Melbourne was fanning unnecessary fear, and that comments by the Minister for Defence, Robert Hill, were "a load of rot". - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/beware-alarmist-rubbish-says-beattie/2005/11/06/1131211949475.html [5]

Police track 'terror plotters'
News.com.au November 07, 2005
EXTRA counter-terrorism police have been rushed to Sydney to take part in the 24-hour surveillance of two suspects believed to be planning an attack on Australian soil. The Australian understands a command post has been established in Sydney to monitor the men, one of whom has been linked to the outlawed terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba. - http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17159600-2,00.html [6]

Interview: Robert Hill
Sunday Channel 9 - 6 November 2005
As government leader in the Senate, Defence Minister Robert Hill presided over the passing of an amendment to anti-terrorism laws at a special sitting this week. The amendment will allow people to be charged if they're considering carrying out a terrorist attack, but haven't decided on specific details. The change was called for by Prime Minister Howard, after he said he received specific intelligence about a potential terrorist threat. Greens Senator Bob Brown said the PM needed to concoct a situation to divert attention from unpopular IR legislation, also introduced this week. Mr Howard said the allegation was ridiculous. Senator Hill accused Senator Brown of using the issue for his own short-term political objectives. The Defence Minister also moved a motion that was passed, that will extend an inquiry into the anti-terrorism laws until the end of the month, to give the Senate plenty of time to examine the bills. Senator Hill will discuss these and other issues with Sunday's political editor, Laurie Oakes - http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/political_transcripts/article_1905.asp [7]

Absolute power
Sydney Morning Herald - 4 November 2005
The Prime Minister says we should trust him; the polls say we do. And now John Howard is counting on our blessing. Peter Hartcher reports. - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/absolute-power/2005/11/04/1130823397714.html [8]

Terrorism laws 'ridiculous', protesters told
SMH - 5 November 2005
The Government's controversial anti-terrorism laws are a threat to anyone disagreeing with Australian foreign policy, a rally to start a weekend of national protest about the laws has been told. - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/terrorism-laws-ridiculous-protesters-told/2005/11/05/1130823432742.html [9]

Terror plotters may stay free
SMH, 7 Nov 2005, By Cynthia Banham and Stephanie Peatling
Arrests might not follow the hurried passage of an amendment to counter-terrorism laws, the Federal Government has admitted just days after the Prime Minister justified the rush on the basis of "specific intelligence" on a terrorist threat. - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/urgent-terror-laws-may-not-lead-to-arrests/2005/11/06/1131211949418.html [10]

Friday forum - Turnbull and Roxon
Lateline, 4 Nov 2005, Reporter: Maxine McKew
MAXINE MCKEW: And are slapped with a control order or a sedition charge? What's the distinction there?
MALCOLM TURNBULL: There's a very big distinction. If people are out there actively promoting and urging others to engage in violence, in terrorist acts, then the Australian community expects the Government, through its law enforcement agencies, to deal with those people and protect society from them. All of us have to live with the necessary and inevitable consequences of our actions. If people are reckless enough or malicious enough to promote violence in our community, then that community, our community, must be protected from them.
MAXINE MCKEW: Let me ask you specifically - under these new laws, what happens to someone who gets up in an Australian mosque and says something like, "God grant victory to the insurgents in Iraq"? Is that seditious or is that likely to have you taken before a judge with a request for preventive detention?
MALCOLM TURNBULL: I don't want - it's rash to be giving legal opinion but let me say I don't think that would come anywhere near the provisions for preventive detention. I don't believe it would fall within the sedition provisions, unless -
MAXINE MCKEW: But it's inflammatory language. Its to say that is against Australian interests.
MALCOLM TURNBULL: The provisions for urging people to assist Australia's enemies are quite specific. However, I don't believe that would necessarily apply to just that one statement.
NICOLA ROXON: This is extraordinary. This is extraordinary from you, Malcolm, because I've been reading the papers today and apparently it's single handedly your backbench committee that has convinced Mr Ruddock and Mr Howard to see some sense in the way they've tightened a number of very welcome changes to these laws. But I know and you know the sedition provisions are really very lazily drafted. They could actually catch a whole lot of people in an unintended way - and I think without commenting on the example that Maxine gave, if after all that intensive discussion that you have already had with the Attorney-General you don't know what the intentions are, how is the public supposed to be confident what these provisions are actually... - http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2005/s1498340.htm [11]

Sedition laws need the chop, say MPs
SMH, November 5, 2005, By Louise Dodson Chief Political Correspondent
Liberal MPs are pushing the Federal Government to not proceed with the sedition provisions of both the new anti-terrorism legislation and the Crimes Act.
The backbenchers who have been pressing for changes include Petro Georgiou, George Brandis, Malcolm Turnbull and Marise Payne. - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/sedition-laws-need-the-chop-say-mps/2005/11/04/1130823397699.html [12]

Act of sedition from Turnbull puts Ruddock on the spot
Sydney Morning Herald - 6 November 2005
He is an articulate defender of Government positions, but on certain issues this high-profile backbencher gets up his colleagues' noses. Michelle Grattan writes. - http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/act-of-sedition-from-turnbull-puts-ruddock-on-the-spot/2005/11/06/1131211930610.html [13]

Turnbull urges review of sedition laws
ABC online, 5 Nov 2005
Federal Coalition backbencher Malcolm Turnbull says the sedition provisions included in the new anti-terrorism laws are archaic and need revision.
Civil libertarians, journalists and media providers have raised concerns about the provisions, which they fear could prevent criticism of the Government. - http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1498428.htm [14]

Sedition 'unclear' in terror laws
Channel 7, 05/11/05
Sedition provisions in the federal government's anti-terrorism legislation are not ideally drafted, prominent Liberal backbencher Malcolm Turnbull says.
On Friday night, Mr Turnbull reiterated concerns on the coalition backbench about the proposed anti-terrorism laws, which former Family Court chief justice Alastair Nicholson has described as the greatest ever attack on Australia's individual liberties. - http://seven.com.au/news/nationalnews/118545 [15]

Sedition gag is no joke, say satirists
SMH, November 7, 2005 The Federal Government may never launch a single prosecution against a comedian, satirist or commentator under its proposed sedition clause in the anti-terrorism legislation - but it still has a chilling effect on those who poke fun at our political masters.

A coalition of comedians and commentators will hold a concert in Sydney on November 13 to protest against the sedition clause - and its fears are well-founded, according to an expert in constitutional law at the University of NSW, George Williams. - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/sedition-gag-is-no-joke-say-satirists/2005/11/06/1131211949478.html [16]

Five years in jail for reporting the truth
The Age, November 7, 2005 Andrew Dodd
THERE'S something very odd about the Federal Government's approach to public debate. On the one hand it's spending $40 million of taxpayers' money to promote "public awareness" about its controversial industrial relations bill. On the other, it's enshrining provisions that close down discussion about its anti-terror laws. - http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/five-years-in-jail-for-reporting-the-truth/2005/11/05/1130823429811.html [17]

Labor defends decision to back anti-terrorism laws
INSIDERS, 05/11/2005
Labor's homeland security spokesman Arch Bevis saw everything that the Prime Minister saw in relation to the potential terrorism attack and he agreed with the Prime Minister that new legislation was needed and the Senate should be recalled. - http://www.abc.net.au/insiders/content/2005/s1498537.htm [18]

Top lawyer damns 'unfair' terror laws
The Age , November 7, 2005, By David Rood
"Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic are going to have public trials. There will be no public trials in Australia for people who are charged with so-called terrorism offences," he said. -

Plan to fast-track troops on streets
Sunday Mail, 06 Nov 05
TROOPS could be deployed on Australian streets within hours of a terror attack or threat under a new Federal Government plan to make it easier to call out the military.
Defence Minister Robert Hill yesterday revealed the plan that could see streets flooded with soldiers in a terror situation.
They would be given detention powers, the right of search and seizure and the power to shoot to kill. - http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,17152657%255E911,00.html [19]

Democracy & Terror
Open Democracy: Current debates
Could democracy be the ultimate antidote to terrorism? In the face of violence, how should democratic values be put into action? - http://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-terrorism/issue.jsp