Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

The Omega Scroll

G'day. I'm back on deck and ready to report the next few weeks of action in federal parliament. We can't call it 'our' parliament any more - that much is clear from the Government's behaviour in the two great issues on the table, the terror laws and industrial relations. In both cases, the government has refused to publish its draft laws and wants them to rush through parliament without scrutiny by the people all of us elected to represent us after input from interested citizens provided with the legislation on offer.

The people are now the enemy, it seems, to be fed sedative propaganda paid for by us in the case of the IR laws, and kept in the dark as much as possible on terror laws which will radically shift the balance of power in favour of the state to the extent that if the state harms any of us by mistake or malicious design, either by the government or by fellow citizens who wish any of us harm, we are not to know about it - and that if we strongly criticise the state we can be, on the whim of Philip Ruddock, changed with sedition.

I'll report from inside the government's citadel, formerly know as the People's House, until it adjourns for Christmas, because I've just got a press gallery pass which brought it home to me that I really am now an independent journo working for and accountable to you, the Webdiary Community. "Pass no. 27671, Kingston, M.L, Webdiary Pty Ltd." Deep breath.

It's been a bloody awful, life changing year for me which somehow, some way, is ending on a positive and hopeful note. I've always been a bit of a loner in my profession, often feeling I was fighting on all fronts, including internally at Fairfax as it slowly lost its pride and confidence in its journalism under relentless assaults from a blinkered, asset stripping, selfish management determined to line its pockets at the expense of quality, commercial foresight and a sense of democratic purpose. How sad that the just departed CEO Fred Hilmer took a whopping $4.5 million as a 'bonus' just before management announced further big cuts in journalist numbers and the dire warning that more was to come. An extract from  the Fairfax memo to Sydney Morning Herald and Sun Herald staff this week- less than a month after Hilmer's big bonus - announced that after a 10 percent cut in journalists, photographers, editors and designers last year, another 35 would go within weeks. And they're targeting senior, experienced staff, ripping away their mentoring role of the trainees Fairfax employs to do as they are told by management without discussion and with little prospect of advancement. Indeed, Hilmer told Canberra bureau staff just after his appointment that his idea was to train juniors who would go elsewhere once trained.

Here's a short extract from the October 25 memo sent to staff by the editor in chief of Fairfax metro newspapers Mark Scott, who also got a bonus despite presiding over failure:

"Since January 2005, the revenue performance for the company's metropolitan newspapers has been lacklustre. Our metropolitan newspapers are facing significant structural pressures and we expect revenue growth may be modest at best for the near future... Even if the redundancy program is implemented, we will continue to carefully manage page volumes in line with advertising conditions. This will help reduce the impact of any staff reductions on the papers.... If the proposal were to go ahead, our total editorial staff at the mastheads would be reduced by a maximum of 7.5%."

What was that Hilmer bonus for again, the last in a long line of bonuses for failed senior management seen off with million dollar payouts? If he'd accepted his multiple failures to protect and grow the company and not ripped that obscene bonus out of the company, those jobs would be secure for more  than another year and SMH readers would not be faced with less news, analysis and investigation in Sydney, across Australia, and from Australian reporters overseas.

And isn't the timing opportune. Just when Australians need detailed, in depth coverage of the terror laws and IR, just when the NSW Labor Government's secrecy and lies over its transport cons are exposing that for them too the people are the enemy, Fairfax management has entangled staff in huge and morale debilitating decisions about their future.

For me, the grief phase of terminating my relationship with Fairfax is over, and I'm looking ahead in the firm and optimistic belief that Webdiary, in its own small way, will keep former Fairfax values alive through the efforts of the Webdiary community.

And I know for certain that I'm not alone, because when I took three weeks off after terminating my contract with Fairfax for material breach to clear my head and look after my Mum many people in the Webdiary community gave their time and talent to keep Webdiary going in style. Thank you to all for the wonderful vote of confidence in what we've achieved so far and what we'll achieve in future.

I got lots of new ideas for Webdiary while I was away, and will write about them for your consideration and comment when the Parliamentary year ends.

One of my favourite Webdiarists, Brigadier Adrian d'Hage, published his first novel this year, The Omega Scroll. I met Adrian many years ago for a very long lunch in Canberra after we'd engaged in vigorous discussion on the merits of the Defence Force Gay Ban when I was working for Michelle Grattan at The Age. He was then the media relations officer for the ADF, and I was surprised and invigorated by the fact that, unlike most people in that line of work, he was happy to engage on the merits.  A Vietnam War hero, d'Hage later ran security for the Sydney Olympics before retiring to write. He first wrote for Webdiary after September 11. You’ll find his Webdiary work at Bush's rhetoric gets more disturbing every day (September 19, 2001), More on War Fever (September 21, 2001), D'hage vision (November 5, 2001, on the boat people post Tampa),The d'Hage report: View from Istanbul (16 February 2003, on the Iraq War). 

After his book was published he wrote me the following letter, which due to my awful record in keeping track of paper I've just found (new year resolution - learn how to manage paperwork). If an established Webdiarist would like to read his book and review it for Webdiary, let me know and I'll send you a review copy.

*

Dear Margo,

It seems like an age since we had that "off the record" lunch in Manuka (the restaurant seems to change its name every time I go back!), or indeed another age since I reported from Istanbul. The fruits of my labour are enclosed - and I see we have great taste in publishers!. I enjoyed Not Happy John immensely.

The Omega Scroll is a thriller designed to reach a broad audience, but you will not be surprised to find that there is a deeper message within its pages. The chase for the scroll aside, there is a message about the futility of going to war, and the influence of religion.

It might sound strange, coming from a military man, but I continue to hold to my view that the invasion of Iraq will go down in history as one of the most ill-planned military operations of modern times and the nuclear suitcase threat is real.

Unfortunately, the only senior US officer to stand up to Bush and Rumsfeld was the US Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki, and not surprisingly, he was sacked.

More importantly, our politics in the Middle East are a real threat to the stability of the wider world. The invasion of Iraq with woefully insignificant troop numbers and without the sanction of the UN has provided a fertile breeding ground for Islamic fundamentalists.Regrettably, the coalition policies in Iraq and the Middle East have also been aided and encouraged by the influential Christian Right in the US. Religion has got a lot to answer for, and I make that remark as someone who holds an honours degree in Theology. I entered my studies as a very committed Christian and graduated "of no fixed religion".

The threat of nuclear suitcase first came to my attention when I was heading up the planning for the security of the Sydney during the Olympics, and I went so far as to organise a response in case one of them should surface. There is now considerable (albeit not well known) open source reporting of the existence of these - first raised by Boris Yeltsin's Security Secretary, Alexander Lebed, in a meeting of the US House of Representatives in 1998.

One can only hope that in the future the West will be blessed with some leaders of vision who can address the "why" of all this before one of those suitcases becomes a reality. More than happy to debate this in the pages of your diary! Keep up the good work.

Best regards,
Adrian d'Hage.

left
right
[ category: ]
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo, we missed you. The place to be in Parliament next Tuesday might be the senate estimates for immigration. Some interesting and fascinating stuff has come up so far in the committee into the Migration Act.

Many things have been wound up - Baxter now has only 4 long term people and we aren't sure what will happen to them. The rest are overstayers from god knows where, people like Stephan Willis I would imagine.

Paul McGeough got his one hell of a story about the Bakhtiyari family - help has come from all over the country for them. The senate now also knows that DIMIA believed they were Afghans from 22 March 2001 but kept Roqia and the kids locked up without cause for 4 years. I reckon that should be one of the wrongful detention cases investigated and after a rocky start when the senators told me they weren't going to investigate they now have to.

God bless the wonderful Paul McGeough. I know it took a huge leap of faith on Alamdar's part to sit and talk to him and now the young lad who helped me convince him to do so, he reads McGeoughs' work too, has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

He is 18 years old and one of the finest young men I have ever met. What a start to the week.

Thank goodness to for Jon Stanhope who brought the terror debate into the public arena.

Now we have the scandal of the Australian Wheat Board (now AWB). I know farmers, and they will not be happy with this. Just imagine, Australia made the biggest contribution of all in the starvation of the Iraqi children for all those years then went and blew them up? And locked them up.

Bush has lost the plot over Katrina, Libby, Miers and so on.

Howard is losing the IR debate big time and lost the terror debate before it started.

It seems more people are looking in the mirrors of Australia and not liking what they see.

In the meantime I am told by the boys, Alamdar and Monty, that Roqia saw the headline - "Mrs Bakhtiyari is one of ours, say Afghan villagers" and is happy.

She begged me to get the truth and I had almost given up on it. Didn't think anyone would help me, too many sceptics.

But then came McGeough.

Margo, it's going to be a busy week indeed.

Margo: Hi Marilyn. Indeed it is.

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo. You say you've always “been a bit of a loner in your profession, often feeling you were fighting on all fronts”.

I am sure most of us at Webdiary have felt the same way. I am grateful you have created a place we the “loners” can meet. I don’t know where the urge to swim against the current and fight the system comes from, but if it burns inside you it certainly separates you from the pack.

A lot of organisations such as Fairfax have lost their pride and confidence. The ALP is only a shadow of what it was. They have lost their vision and now lack direction. Most companies are under relentless assaults from a blinkered, asset stripping, selfish management determined to line their pockets at the expense of quality.

On the bright side it looks like Bush’s chickens are coming home to roost; Howard’s can’t be far away. It is through hard work and a passion to right injustice that we change the direction Howard is taking us.

Thank you, and all at Webdiary for providing a sanctuary for the real “Aussie Battlers”.

Margo: Hi John. I eschewed even turning on a computer for most of my break - my back gave way for a start - but noticed you've been an active commentor in my absence. Thanks for keeping the faith.

re: The Omega Scroll

WOW - my best and warmest congrats with your Gallery Pass, Margo - it feels really good for the future of "the MK and WD democracy scrutineers".

Coming week the ALP's Tony Burke MP, who I've sent a stack of sheets with the next 10,000 signatures under our Royal Commission petition may find an opportunity to table them and speak on the occasion. Keep your eyes on the timetable to check.

Margo: Will do Jack, and thank you for your stalwart efforts for Webdiary while I was away. I wonder, would Mr Burke write a piece for Webdiary on the case for a Royal Commission into DIMIA?

re: The Omega Scroll

Hi Margo, and welcome back. I just wanted to quickly note that the Webdiary and others like it are the only hope for any kind of sensible and respectable thought and discussion. The ever increasing wasteland that is the result of an apathetic and, frankly lazy, political/media machine has left me feeling hollow to the core. I feel the need to constantly fight cynicism due to the persistant malaise I feel.

The Webdiary is a light on a barren lunar landscape.

Congratulations on your press pass.

Margo: Hi Paul, and thanks for the vote of confidence. Webdiary will survive and thrive if Webdiarists want it to. My job, apart from writing, is ensure the Webdiary space is safe for contributors to have their say, that our ethics of civil discourse are maintained, and that we build up over time complete transparency in our decision making and editorial policies and full accountibility to Webdiarists for our content and financial accounts. I do that, and circulation will grow. And if that happens, David Roffey's big ticket job, to create a sustainable revenue base so we can survive and grow and therefore give more and more opportunities to Webdiarists to contribute to information gathering, democratic debate and website development, is much easier. It all depends on Webdiarists - you, me, the Webdiary management team and every Webdiarist who cares about this space and wants to help shape and secure it. You are us.

re: The Omega Scroll

Just to lighten things up for a bit, A very perceptive letter in today's Australian:

"John Howard's anti-terrorism laws will provide us with the ultimate excuse for taking a sickie: '"I'm not allowed to say where I've been, and if you ask, you will go to jail. Now let us never speak of this again.'"

Touche'!

Rosemary Walters
Palmerston, ACT

re: The Omega Scroll

Congrats on getting that Pass as an independent journalist, Margo! I personally feel indebted to you - in that your stalwart commitment not to 'sell out' continues, despite personal cost.

My sincere thanks to you and the team. Webdiary is like an island of honest debate in an apparent sea of sludgy half-truth and (to use your apt phrase) 'sedative propaganda'.

Margo: And thanks to you for reading, Mardi. Readership and reader participation is the key to securing Webdiary's long term future. When Fairfax withdrew their support for Webdiary in March, several Webdiarists stood up to be counted. PF Journey paid for his accountant to set up Webdiary Pty Ltd. Ian McPherson donated internet space for a year. Marc McDonald wrote a discussion paper on the way forward. Terrence Philgren, Caroline Compton, Craig Rowley, Polly Bush, Russell Darroch, Micheal Ekin Smyth and several others became volunteer comments editors. Roger Fedyk did some heavy duty computer techie stuff to help us transfer to the new site. David Roffey became managing director to get the show on the road and ensure it ran as smoothly as possible. Our columnists put their heads down and wrote some great pieces, and our commentors, regular and occasional, produced engaging debate. David Browning and Nigel Sim are working like dogs to get our new site ready. Carl Baker is our tireless and ever cheerful website designer for the temporary site and the new site. Robert Bosler and PF put their heads down to work on longer term revenue ideas. Our three full time workers, Hamish Alcorn, Kerri Browne and Wayne Sanderson, are working long and hard to publish pieces, manage comments, and produce orginal content. I'm bound to have forgotten or not even be aware of other Webdiarist helpers amid the drama of trying to settle with Fairfax rather than terminate my contract for material breach and then promoting the independent Webdiary and worrying about where the money will come from when mine runs out. Hamish, could you add people I've missed?

re: The Omega Scroll

Great Margo! I'll look forward to your reports. What on earth does Fred Hilmer regard as a good result ? Fairfax has been raking it in. I sometimes rail against journalists but no-one wants to see people lose their jobs. How do they expect the titles in the Fairfax group to survive when they are encouraging older journos to retire and thus lose a wealth of experience? Their titles are already run on a shoestring staff.

I have a feeling, John Pratt, that although the Scooter Libby indictment is the beginning of some extraordinary revelations to come, it's going to be a long and painful process. George Bush seems to have a teflon side to him that seems to surround JWH as well.

re: The Omega Scroll

Greetings Margo. I especially look forward to your views and opinions over the next few weeks as these are not going to be any ordinary times in Australian history.

The most important thing is caring enough to get the story right and tell it well! I once read an advice along the following lines:

When you feel yourself falling into the trap of powerlessness, take out a piece of paper and write the following: This is new territory. I am an explorer. Tack it up on your bulletin board. Look at it once an hour, and write it over again if necessary. Remind yourself that the most important work you are doing is in the process itself. You are discovering and recording aspects of yourself and the world that are uniquely yours. If this were easy, there would be no point to it.

You are mapping out new territory, and it may be harrowing—and, for that matter, you may not arrive at the destination you had set out for. But you will experience wonders along the way, and you will transmit them to paper to the best of your ability. The world may expect one thing from you, but you are free to deliver something else entirely. In writing, you are obligated only to yourself and to the work. Clearly, you are up to it!

Good luck...

CODA: "Far better to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered with failure, than to live like people who ... neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows no victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt

Margo: Hi Jozef. Thank you for your brilliant work updating us daily on the reporting of the terror laws debate. Thank God for librarians! And thank you too for your wonderful piece Make-believe democracy: drowning with the authoritarians. Adrian d'Hage is having a go too, as are many others.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo Great to see you back!

John, maybe we'll have to modify the name to the Loners Club Chaos ;-) I wonder if any of the recently (or about to be) sacked journos would care to join us in Loners Land. At least they could keep their hand in while looking for the next job (sic) in Howard's flexible work force. (No one ever seems to question very deeply just what this does to jobs, quality, and stability for companies...minor details.)

Margo: Hi Russell, and thank you for your work for Webdiary while I was away. Open invitation to the 'redundant' and the sacked - please join us while you look for work. And you never know - maybe I'll have the money to commission pieces from you one day.

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo! Adrian d'Hage is an enlightened local commentator on defence/security that I'd always sit up and listen to seriously. I got lucky and just happened to dredge up from my vaults an article of his from four years ago, 19 October 2001 (The Age, sorry no link):

And what of the Taliban? The Northern Alliance is not an acceptable replacement. So, for the sake of the argument, let's assume the Taliban is defeated and a United Nations-backed government is installed. Does the plan allow for the defeated Taliban withdrawing into the Hindu Kush, where they will enlist the help of their supporters in Pakistan for the beginning of a new war? A guerrilla war.

This could become Vietnam Mark 2. Different geography, but the principle will be the same. Time was never of great consequence to the North Vietnamese and Vietcong. Afghanistan is a more timeless land still.

And what if the Anthrax attacks in the US are traced to Iraq and the hard right of the US administration prevails in widening the conflict to attacks on Baghdad? Australia will not get a say in that, but are we part of that plan, too?

Not a bad 'call', I reckon. I'll look out for the novel.

Margo: Hi Jacob. I understand you defended my honour in relation to a former Webdiarist who peddled blatant falshoods about me and a friend of mine while I was away. Much appreciated.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo, welcome back, and I hope your mum's doing better now. I'll also join those congratulating you here re your Press Gallery pass as a Webdiarist, albeit I'd love overheard the (behind the scenes) discussions leading up to its issue! Meanwhile, Webdiary sails on into our deeply troubled political waters, as do we all. And, I'm proud to be onboard...
all the best.

Margo: Thank you JH. And we'll publish your first piece for Webdiary soon.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo - "your stalwart efforts for Webdiary" - no problem, Margo, it was fun working with especially Kerri, who's shown up as a true professional and a fast-as-lightning on-line worker with all the web skills and more - thank her!

"Would Mr Burke write a piece for Webdiary on the case for a Royal Commission into DIMIA?"

Sure he would if you'd ask. His office has been highly welcoming of folks in the refugee lobby, and if you mention the petition to him, he will have an opportunity to write his speech as an article - increasing the quality on both fronts.

Margo: Will ask. And I have thanked Kerri personally, a great find for Webdiary!

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo, a big welcome back. Never quite the same without you around. Not to demean the fine job Hamish, Kerri et al have been doing. Kerri is a find - make sure she doesn't suffer "editors burnout", please!

Now to the challenges ahead...

Margo: Hi Bob. Editor's burnout? What might that be...

re: The Omega Scroll

Aw, shucks... But anyway I'd defer to a certain other contributor who did a top analysis of the whole affair that exposed the sham conclusively. I won't offend his humility except to say his initials begin with M and end with P. Cheers.

Margo: Michael Park, by any chance? Thank you too, Michael.

re: The Omega Scroll

To Margo. Re "We the loners", I have spent a lot of my time in the past swimming upstream, and it takes a while but you get there! I'll look forward with great interest to the reports that will be coming from "Pass no. 27671, Kingston, M.L, Webdiary Pty Ltd." Thanks for taking the step!

Margo: And thanks for reading and contributing to Webdiary, Rex.

re: The Omega Scroll

Greg Sheridan, that champion of Australian sovereignty, writes today about the SAS and Howard. I wonder if the SAS will permit a future Labor Government. Armies tend not to like SAS type organisations (for many good military reasons and not so good personal reasons) so this is a SAS specific comment.

Sheridan hangs out with people who have a clue. People like General Anthony Cordsman, a person who doesn't spin but just tells what he sees (we mightn't like what he says but it is truthful and realistic.).

Speaking to two nurses on Thursday night who were returning from an IR rally I mentioned I had a post here. They thought that Margo was the most genuine person to ever appear on TV.

The IR laws seem so unimportant at the moment. I'm not sure if so many contentious issues at once plays into the Governments hands or not, but I wish to say one thing about the IR debate. It isn't just about rates of pay (minimun or other rates). It is about control over one's self.

Most of my neighbours work for $12.70 per hour (casual). They work several hours at dawn and several at dusk (ie split shifts). So they commit over 12 hours of a day to the employer but sit at home for 6 hours in the middle.

I unionised my workplace in 2001. Management was really scared. However once they realised that the staff were unhappy with how management conducted their supervision (changing or cancelling break times without notice) and certain people (that is their code for me - but I still thought it was wrong) being treated specially by management, management instantly changed these things and had far better morale.

Management would have done this if they knew staff were unhappy. Unionising just gave a formal process. In my opinion management got great benefit from it and the employees paid their dues to improve the company's management and their own working conditions.

We worked in the evening. There is an industry wide enterprise agreement. No overtime, no penalty rates but people were ok with that as the pay was a lot higher than $12.70 (around $20 now). The industry is geared to employees who want to work part time. However some such as me worked mostly full time (and on the dole for Jan/Feb each year). The problems with working casual, evening work as the only source of income is that one must be prepared to work every day, whether work is available or not. This means one can make no social plans whatsoever. One's only social choices is to get drunk with work mates after work. One cannot committ to any organisations (I used to coordinate gaol and hospitals visitors in NSW).

This is what the IR reform will do. Shatter any community participation (P&C won't hold their meetings at 9am) and making friends difficult.

The important consequences are about our power over ourself rather than the minor issue of pay rates. Penalty rates give an economic incentive to emplorers to conduct their business in a way that encourages a balance betwwen work and life.

If the $12.70 people were required to be paid penalty rates for split shifts then split shifts would be replaced by two shifts or other adaptions.

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo. Looking forward to getting the real (Truth) stories from Parliament.I Hope we get some real breaking news. I hope your mum is OK.

Margo: Hi Mick. I'll do my best. And yep, Mum is doing well.

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo. I hope the year ends well for you.

Margo: Thanks Jay. And for you, too.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo, great to have you back - and congratulations to Hamish, Kerri, David, Craig, Josef et al for keeping the good ship Webdiary on an even keel. You should be proud of your creation. Webdiary has been like a small, steady candle in the dark for me over the past few years. I look forward to seeing the flame grow, illuminating all those unmentionable corners of this nation's psyche.

Your choice of Howard's Hubris is apt. Right up there with Gar's Mahal and Whitlam's Folly!

Finally, Margo, it will be excellent to see John Henry Calvinist's debut: I have no doubt that it will provoke some interesting responses.

Margo: Thanks Fiona.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo, welcome back and I hope all is well now. I must concur with previous posts that the standard of editing has been great, and debate has been allowed to stay "clean". The editing staff don't often get thanked for what is a largely a thankless job. I look forward to your spirited replies to my posts again, and look forward to the future for Webdiary.

Hi Justin, and thanks for your kind words and much deserved appreciation for our comments editors. It's a dog of a job at times, believe me. Are you J Wilshaw or do we have another JW Club Chaos patron?

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo. You were sorely missed.

Margo: Hi Terrence, and thank you for your tireless comments editing stints while I was away.

re: The Omega Scroll

CODA: The Walkley magazine (home of the Walkley awards for journalism – the nominees are in this issue), has a feature about blogging:

It’s a battle between big media and the blogosphere, citizen journalists and professionals. Who will win? Or should journalists be looking at what they can learn? David Higgins surveys the frontline Power To The People?

re: The Omega Scroll

GH'day. From Friday's sealed section of Crikey, by Stephen Mayne:

Is Ron Walker the new Lord Beaverbrook?

When Ron Walker joined the John Fairfax board in 2002, he resigned from the Liberal Party so he could be a politically independent director of Australia's most important and venerable media empire. But his comments about the leadership of the Victorian Liberal Party last week show that he has a lot to learn about managing these perceptions and conflicts, especially after assuming the chairmanship of Fairfax a few weeks ago.

Former Victorian Premier John Cain summed in up nicely with this letter in The Age yesterday:

Your newspaper has a bit of a problem with the chairman of the Fairfax board, Ron Walker. His latest intrusions into Liberal Party politics only serve to highlight the problem. Mr Walker seems to regard his role as being similar to that of Lord Beaverbrook, who ran a media empire in Britain 80 years ago. Historians report it was Lord Beaverbrook's custom to suggest to King George V, who, on the conservative side of politics, should be called upon to form government. This is not an appropriate role for the head of a media corporation in the year 2005. Mr Walker needs to make up his mind whether he wants to be king-maker and breaker in the Liberal Party, or head what has been a fiercely independent media corporation.

Well said – except that John Cain himself is not so pure when it comes to his record for defending independent media companies. Former Herald & Weekly Times CEO John D'Arcy's little reported book, Media Mayhem: Playing With The Big Boys in Media, criticises the former Labor premier for not raising a concern when Rupert Murdoch's News Corp was allowed to buy the HWT in 1987-88, thereby creating unprecedented concentration of newspaper ownership in Australia.

Of course, the HWT was known for its conservative editorial line back then, and Rupert Murdoch was thick as thieves with the Hawke Labor government. You wouldn't have thought that after reading today's Herald Sun editorial which attacked Bob Hawke for shedding crocodile tears over workers now when he was responsible for "decimating the Australian Federation of Air Pilots when the federation was locked in a pay dispute with the airlines".

And who then owned 50% of Ansett? News Corporation. Just goes to show the power that comes with owning a vast media empire.

*

Then there's this doozy by Hugo Kelly:

Fairfax redundancies get political in Canberra

The spectre of Ron Walker has raised its exceedingly ugly head as the Fairfax redundancies threaten to get nasty. According to swirling rumours, the Fairfax chairman has drawn up a hit list of "leftie" journalists he wants drummed out of the company – and near the top is SMH Canberra correspondent Mike Seccombe.

The Herald Canberra bureau stop work meeting was a noisy and divided affair yesterday, as the gallery hacks came to terms with the political undercurrents driving the Fairfax redundancy program.

Staff are meeting with management this morning, followed by another stop work meeting.

The writing was on the wall when Max Walsh wrote his well-briefed Bulletin column this week reflecting the Walker view: that the paper needs to move away from its "left liberal" line. Stay tuned for more action as the situation hots up, and nervous hacks calculate their potential redundancy payments.

In the words of one senior insider: "A lot of senior journos grabbed calculators, did the sums and saw easy street. But on reflection, it's not clear how many will go for the money. Many want to stay in journalism and can't see any ready alternatives in quality journalism, with contributors budgets shrinking and few full time jobs available."

So if there isn't a rush, will things get really nasty as management starts tapping people who don't want to go?

*

Bye bye diversity of news judgment and opinion in Australia's mainstream media. I wonder, would people with spare cash pitch in to sponsor one or two great Fairfax journos to join Webdiary? Michelle Grattan, Secco, Gay Alcorn? I reckon their reputations, and those of several other wonderful, gutsy Fairfax journos, are propping up the reputation of their once proud mastheads, which Hilmer and co have relentlessly trashed for years. Secco, for example, shows up in SMH readers surveys as one of its most popular writers. But that means nothing these days, does it. And former Age editor Bruce Guthrie, who'd turned around circulation and restored some confidence and pride in the paper, was given his marching orders at the behest of Fairfax board member Rod Carnegie, a Kennett supporter. Carnegie even admitted it sometime time later. Circulation duly dived, again. Fairfax used to pride itself on editorial independence. That's a joke now, a very sick one. SMH editors - of the paper and online - are yes men, and I know that from personal experience.

The ABC is no longer independent of Government either. I was forced off Late Night Live a couple of years ago after sustained ABC management pressure - listeners liked my stuff, but so what? I'll write one day about how ABC radio in Perth, Brisbane and Canberra treated me regarding interviews on my book last year. In Brisbane, the station manager sat in the producers box to ensure that mostly antagonistic callers were put through.

I wonder, would it be possible for some Fairfax shareholders - I'm still one of them - to get together to take the Fairfax Board to Court over its big bonus payout to the departing Hilmer? I mean, on what basis would he get a $4.5 million bonus when the company was clearly in deep trouble?

re: The Omega Scroll

Thanks Margo and the team for such a great site. Where else would we read such revealing and gut wrenching exposes such as Chris Rau's. Since Webdiary has become independent I only fleetingly go to the SMH website to view the cartoon.

Margo: Thanks Keith. I'm looking forward to the permanent site being ready - then we'll have control over the technology and be able to respond to Webidarists' ideas for innovation quickly.

re: The Omega Scroll

I thought y'all might like to know that the whole "suitcase nuke" threat is chimeric.

Nuclear weapons require maintenance. The suitcase nukes were constructed in the 70s by the KGB as means to decapitate the American power structure in the event of a war between the two superpowers.

Thing is, if they were constructed in the 70s, they are not really deployable unless they have been maintained properly over the years. The nuclear fuel that makes the bomb so deadly will corrode the intricate parts within the weapon. After a period of time, these parts will need replacing. With the march of history, that time has long passed - unless al-Qaeda or any other non-state actor who has possession of such weapons has managed to construct the highly sophisticated machining facilities and foundries required deep in the caves of Tora Bora. Consider the expertise needed to machine the incredibly intricate materials and parts that make up a nuclear weapon. Is it realistic that an organisation like al-Qaeda has these capacities?

d'Hage is chasing his tail.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo...I've just had a call from a (much esteemed) friend of mine, insisting that I put my name down for the reviewer's post re "The Omega Scroll. Should you concur...I'll promise to deliver same within the week.

Margo: You're on. Will post to you tomorrow.

re: The Omega Scroll

No Margo, it’s me, same JW. I thought it must be a pain to type my full name, and Marilyn stated calling me Jay and then I didn’t know if she was referring to me or Jay White so I thought, just change the bloody name.

Margo: Cool. Thanks Justin. It's nice to be on a first name basis at last.

re: The Omega Scroll

James Waterton, it would be prudent to prepare for this anyway.

Risk Of Something Happening X Consequence Of It Happening = Amount Of Concern. While the risk may be low the consequence is high.

Also one imagines that a military man may have access to non open source material that they cannot reveal to Webdiary.

Maybe some ruskie sells a recent 155mm shell. Do you want to take the chance and rely on decayed parts to not work?

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo - welcome back. Look forward to your perspective on what I would term the trashing of parliament.

Margo: Hi Sean. The sad thing is it was trashed and forever diminished on October 23 and 24 2003, when Bush and Hu addressed it, with virtually no reporting of what happened to our democratic pride. I detailed the debacle in Webdiary at the time (see the 2003 archive from October 21, 2003) and in my book. What's happening now is following the precedents set on those terrible days.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo: One of the best things about Webdiary is that it empowers everyone who reads and contributes. Everyone is saying "Welcome back", but your spirit never left.

James Waterton, David Candy, points taken. However if the actuarial risks are as great as the Howard Government is leading us all to believe, why on Earth are they cocking things up by superimposing other agendas on top of this one?

Not only was the Scott Parkin affair a bloody minded overreaction, it also helped put many people in democracy defence mode. Then again, maybe that's not bad.

At the time of writing, I couldn't see anywhere else to log this gem from John Della Bosca on the NSW Fair Go Campaign:

Our budget is less than 1 per cent of Mr. Howard's multi-million dollar campaign but we believe that it costs a lot less to tell the truth.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo Kingston, I believe that the payout would be part of his contract, either as a bonus for meeting goals, or a severence payment in lieu of the full term of his contract, or something like that.

Margo: Hi Stuart. He had already finished his contract, and got a year's extension because FF management couldn't find a replacement. Bonuses are for performance. Hilmer dragged Fairfax down, and down, and down. He refused to spin off F2 when the money was there during the dot com boom. He announced he'd start a free paper in Melbourne for commuters, then agreed with Murdoch that he wouldn't if Murdoch wouldn't. Then, of course, Murdoch did, and his product in Melbourne has been a raging success. He chopped 25 percent of smh.com.au online staff in 2002, from memory, when the site led the world, bringing to a screaming halt great innovations in audio and video news. Now, of course, the net is the future, but there's no money to invest in it and the focus is on making money from the free contributions of readers - without any mutual obligations to those readers of accountibility and transparency. I'll tell the story of the means FF used to withdrew its support from Webdiary one day, and the utter contempt it showed for Webdiary readers in the process.

Stuart, did you know that if you make a comment on the smh site, Fairfax can sue you if it gets sued for something you write? You'd think that very onerous obligation on its readers would, as a matter of decency, be highlighted on the paper's interactive areas, wouldn't you? Have a look at Fairfax Digital's conditions for use of smh.com.au here. You get to 'conditions' on the smh blog I looked at right down the bottom, after Subscribe | Privacy | Contact Us:

In particular, you agree not to # use Fairfax Digital to defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise offend others; # publish, distribute, e-mail, transmit or disseminate any material which is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, indecent, offensive or inappropriate;

You will indemnify Fairfax Digital if Fairfax Digital or its related bodies corporate suffer any loss or damage or incur any costs in connection with any breach of these conditions or any other legal obligation by you or your use of or conduct on Fairfax Digital.

Should you object to any of these conditions or any subsequent modifications your only recourse is to immediately discontinue your use of Fairfax Digital.

This onerous and potentially financially ruinous obligation on readers who comment on smh.com.au did not apply to Webdiary, because it was hosted by an outsouced provider and did not come under the Fairfax Digital conditions of use. Fairfax did this to distance itself from Webdiary when I went under contract in August last year. One of the demands FF made when I asked for technical support to cope with the ever increasing volume of comments was to bring Webdiary within the Fairfax Digital umberella. In my view, the conditions are an attempt by FF to avoid taking editorial responsibility for the material from readers it runs on its website, as distinct from its hard copy paper, where letters to the editor are screened for legal problems as a matter of course, as for all other content in the paper. Be afraid of the new breed Fairfax boys, Stuart.

Those sort of payments are very hard, and very expensive, to challenge in a court. It's easier to get shareholders to put a resolution requiring shareholders to approve future bonus's, I think.

And as for those being fired being of the 'left', I see it as Fairfax responding to declining circulation (especially in The Age, who are being hammered by the Herald Sun in Melbourne) combined with a greater focus on dodgy circulation figures being presented to advertisers (we have Crikey to thank for at least part of that).

Margo: Stuart, The Age has been stripped of staff and resources for years. There's virtually no senior staff left, and editors spend lots of their time scrambling for freelancers. It's almost impossible for a talented young journo on the paper to get an upgrading, so they leave, sometimes for the Herald Sun. FF management's latest pick for editor, Andrew Jaspan, has proved a disaster, as predicted by many before his appointment. He's had to reverse several decisions, including ending a seperate business section and sacking a much loved columnist, after mass protests from readers! For several years, FF has spent mega bucks on rolling redesigns of The Age instead of investing in journalists. Did you know that about ten years ago The Age rated number 1 in the ten most respected Melbourne Institutions as voted by residents? No more - now it's not even on the list. Hilmer stripped the paper of its identity by making smh journos write for The Age as well to save money, without, of course, being accountable to the editor of The Age or to Age readers. Hilmer's heavies in Sydney even offered the SMH film reviewer a pay rise if he'd write for the Age as well. No wonder Age readers have deserted their paper in droves. One last thing. Ten years ago, Age journos got paid much less than SMH journos. They didn't complain, because they were proud to work for The Age. This is one of the many commercial upsides of a proud, solid, ethical masthead. All gone down the tubes, now. The FF story is a tragedy. And the perpetrators are off at Aspen and other places where they enjoy their ill-gotten gains while the mastheads they destroyed and the people who loved them and worked way beyond the call of duty to protect their reputations and values have left in disgust or are about to be tapped on the shoulder.

The management have a look between their papers and Murdoch's, and see that even if Murdoch's papers aren't growing, they are maintaining a generally stable position, while their own are declining. What is the difference? It seems to be their political viewpoint being to the left, compared to Murdoch's on the right, that is the difference (and they would probably see this view vindicated by the Coalition's federal success over the past decade).

Margo: It's not about being to the left, Stuart. The SMH has a mix of commentators, and, believe it or not, many SMH readers are to the left, or are small l liberals. The real problem, in my view, is that FF papers have crunched their journo numbers, with many moving to the Aus! Have a look - Brad Norington, Greg Roberts, Glenda Corporal, the list goes on and on. Murdoch builds his talent pool as Fairfax runs its down.

However, I see the only real hope is if Rural Press takes over Fairfax (probably in a scrip/cash offer). Why? Because Rural Press has what Fairfax has not - good management. The market realises it, with good circulation figures and rising share prices. A good management team along with perhaps removing some of the more inane or extreme columists might see Fairfax regaining some of its market share in the Sydney and Melbourne markets. This would save Fairfax from probably becoming some other media groups print division.

Margo: I agree that a RP takeover might be the best FF could hope for. May I ask, though, who in your view are FF's "inane or extreme columnists"?

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo Kingston: "Who are FF's inane or extreme commentators?"

Extreme dishonesty and stupidity - Michael Gawenda (for numerous articles, one such example and more here. There are at least five examples of his inability to accurately produce a set of facts.

Extreme bluster in the face of Latham's loss at the last election - Alan Ramsey. Apart from still not saying anything about Latham since the sale of his diaries (a nice 'sorry for promoting this man ceaselessly as the next PM' would suffice), his rant after the Coalition's win at the last election was disgusting - 'Now we all have to pay for the comfortable idiocy of the manipulated minority' etc.

Extreme ramblings - Michael Leunig. You only have to see the degradation of what used to be lighthearted looks at life and society degrade into a frothing mockery of cartoons and inane opinion pieces.

Inane unreadable colums - Helen Razer. She writes things most people can't comprehend. Due to the sleepyness that falls over people when they actually read her colums. See here.

Others out there I consider extremely inept or inane - Mark Coultan, Alison Broinowski, Miranda Devine (especially when she starts talking about 4WD's, though not only about that). Peter FitzSimonds (when he steps away from talking about sport and moves into society or politics).

Paul McGeough (another 'on the brink of civil war in Iraq' or 'this could lead to civil war in Iraq' article (usually covering things like 'elections' and the like - I think we are up to around 17 or so) and I will scream.

Judith Armstrong for this comment - 'If, as the adage goes, education is wasted on the young, it is tempting to wonder whether democracy is not wasted on voters.'

This is not a complete list, either of the people I consider extreme or inane, or the actual faults of those I have listed, but it was the best I could do on short notice.

Margo: Stuart, to many others, some of the people you mention would be rated among their favourite columnists. If they were dropped, those people would be upset. To each his own, eh? My favourite FF columnists are Ramsey, Michael Duffy, Ross Gittins, Mike Seccombe and Adele Horin (SMH), Laura Tingle, Geoffrey Barker and Tony Harris (Australian Financial Review) and Michelle Grattan, Shaun Carney and Catharine Lumby (The Age). My criteria - they do their research, have a long memory, read widely, are passionate about their work and strive for accuracy. They admit their mistakes, and care about truth. Most importantly, they make me think and invariably tell me stuff I didn't know.

Now, which columnists do you consider NOT to be inane or extreme?

re: The Omega Scroll

Under what bushel have you been hiding this man's light Margo?

It might sound strange, coming from a military man, but I continue to hold to my view that the invasion of Iraq will go down in history as one of the most ill-planned military operations of modern times and the nuclear suitcase threat is real. Unfortunately, the only senior US officer to stand up to Bush and Rumsfeld was the US Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki, and not surprisingly, he was sacked.

He's quite right with respect to our "politics in the Middle East". All the sabre rattling and prattling about democracy is achieving very little. Indeed it appears that Iraq now meets the pedant's definition of civil war. The Scotsman reports:

THE conflict in Iraq took another significant step in the direction of civil war yesterday when rival Sunni and Shiite militias fought a gun battle outside Baghdad in which 15 people were killed. The fighting broke out after Sunni insurgents kidnapped a member of militant Shiite cleric Muqtadr al Sadr's Mahdi Army.

Further, it appears that Ali al-Sistani has lost faith in the "elected" Shiite dominated government:

Iraq's leading Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, has decided not to endorse the Shiite coalition which ran under his banner in January, according to sources on both sides. Close associates said Mr Sistani's decision reflected his disappointment with Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari's Shiite-led government.

Given the Shiite militias now run the police and security apparatus in the Shia dominated south of the country. One can reasonably expect this to continue.

It's worth asking the question just what is it that al-Sistani is not happy with? Remembering this man spent the Hussien years comfortably ensconced in Iran – at the Mulla's convenience. Those same militias owe much to the same country.

re: The Omega Scroll

There has to be a book in it, Margo. The story of the downward spiral of a once great newspaper chain caused by businessmen without a clue about publishing. I'm sure one of the Fairfax family would love to get their side of the story out as well.

Margo: Indeed. I'd certainly be prepared to be interviewed for it. But I can't take it on because I've got lots of work to do bedding down the independent Webdiary and securing its long term future.

re: The Omega Scroll

David Candy: "It would be prudent to prepare for this anyway."

I disagree. It would be wasteful and imprudent to prepare for this. Society has scarce resources and we must spend them on actual risks, rather than heading off on expensive wild goose chases. Ask anyone who is expert on this kind of thing and they will tell you that suitcase bombs pose nigh on zero threat, and the threat recedes further as the years go by and the unmaintained bombs decay further.

I imagine d'Hage had read about the suitcase bomb threat when 60 Minutes in the US scooped the Lebed claims. He may have believed there was a threat without conducting a proper investigation into the nature of the weapons - after all, the threat seems ostensibly plausible. And it's questionable that, even as a military man, he would have good intel on Soviet nuclear weapons. It has not been comprehensively verified that the suitcase bombs actually exist (although I suspect they probably do) - let alone being in an operable state after all these years.

The point is that not even the Americans know for sure that these weapons were constructed. Incidentally, Lebed's claims and motives for speaking out have been widely questioned. Recently before making the claims, he was drummed out of the Kremlin in a power struggle.

re: The Omega Scroll

Michael de Angelos, I'd wager that Fairfax's death spiral has been caused by publishers who didn't have a clue about business, not the reverse.

Margo: Hi James. I think they had a clue about the business of making widgets, ie a product that didn't change daily requiring quick responses and dedicated staff operating on impossible deadlines, but no idea at all about the media business. I'll write more about this one day. My public take so far is in The future of fair dinkum journalism, written in early April when FF was stonewalling about giving me techincal support to cope with the volume of comments and nearly two months before FF pulled the plug and we entered unsuccessful negotiations for a termination settlement:

For me, (Webdiary) was liberation from the depressing state of mainstream newspaper journalism. In my years in the game, I've watched newspapers cease becoming papers of record. Where once we would follow an inquiry or a court case daily, now we jump in and out, or not even turn up at all until decision day. This occurred in 2003 when Fairfax failed to have a reporter at Hanson's fraud trial, despite the fact that her rise had dominated the news for years. Partly it is because of a contraction in journalist numbers, partly it is a crunch in news space, and partly it is the chase for scoops that will be mentioned on radio and TV, ignoring the fact that only newspapers can give readers comprehensive, value-added coverage of such stories.

Then there are the ever-earlier deadlines as papers focus on glossy supplements rather than news. This has seen the rise of 'managed news' where editors want to know what the news is at morning conference and are loathe to change their plans when news breaks later! Even worse, Fairfax editors started to talk of 'managing' reporters as well as news, and getting rid of reporters whose style was not amenable to 'management'. As the layers of editorial management began to match or exceed that in public service bureaucracies, reporters became content providers, and news was seen as the space between the ads. Our audience became consumers, not citizen readers, and news judgement became a marketing game of creating the mix that pleased advertisers and accorded with consumer surveys.

Above all, I sensed that the traditional way of writing news had become redundant as newsmakers got to know and exploit our news judgement and our deadlines to mould news reporting to fit into their propaganda machines. We weren't adapting to that fact, or finding ways to challenge it. We were in a straitjacket and didn't seem to know it. Or maybe we did, and didn't care. Maybe we had become part of the power elite, not the questioners of it. In short, I didn't feel I belonged any more. I saw the journalist's role as the interface between the people and the powerful, asking questions on behalf of the people, and demanding accountability by the powerful to the people. We had duties, I thought, to our readers as citizens, and to our democracy. This view now triggered eye-glazing or eye-rolling among senior management. I thought they were commercially silly not to see it my way; they thought I was a relic of a bygone era.

re: The Omega Scroll

I'll add to the welcome back too Margo. At least we know someone in the Press Gallery is thinking about what they write and cover - yourself.

My own feeling is that once you get used to the freedom you will push your boundaries even more, with success. Many thanks for providing this space for anyone to use.

On the bonuses for Execs, this is a blight that senior staff in the Australian Public Service introduced for themselves during a period when they separated themselves from staff below the top structure. The idea being the lower ranks picked up CPI payrises while the Execs negotiated their own additional pay rise over and above the CPI.

Many question why seemingly failed Execs get paid bonuses. The answer is that these bonuses are negotiated and documented with any given Exec specifying what they would achieve and management stating the amount of reward should that objective be met. Sounds OK, except the "productivity" gains specified by many Execs are that they will deliver a reduction in expenditure and that usually is specific to staffing levels.

In other words while the operation was succesful, the patient may have died (staff cuts). Bottom line cost reduced but organisation fails. No problem the Exec still achieved the agreed drop in costs despite eliminating a service area or the like.

QLD's Energex is a great example of this. The last two years of power blackouts and more have still seen bonuses awarded until the outcry was sufficient for Premier Beattie to make some announcement that this practice would discontinue. Of course all the existing staff still have their contracts but...

Of course this bonus system came from the US, and with Australia being the newest US state it's natural this should occur.

Margo: Hi Ross, and thank you for becoming a comments editor in my absence. Onya!

re: The Omega Scroll

I agree with your list of columnists Margo, but I think Stuart is a little confused about McGeough. He is not an opinion writer mate, he gets in there boots and all and does the job of reporting the facts.

I have just read David Marr's contribution to "Do Not Disturb" and he points out that the media has a short attention span and 'makes" what they think is news worthy.

Without his own pieces on the TAMPA it would never have been done but they were quickly overcome by the children unthrown. Which roused stuff all interest except by people like Philip Adams who didn't for one moment think that Iraqi refugee parents would throw their children into the sea when they were almost at safety - unless they were terrified at being shot at in the middle of the night of course or in danger of sinking.

He pointed out that on the Aceng there were over 100 children, something not widely known.

Then he does a critique of the case of Al Kateb and Al Khafaji. Now Al Khafaji is a great and dear friend of mine and dearly loved by every person he meets. He is a lovely, gentle man, an Iraqi teacher who spent 20 years illegally in Syria from the age of 7. He was the only Iraqi deemed to be a refugee right from the beginning but still denied because he had been in Syria. They had all been in Syria, Jordan or Iran but those countries became too dangerous because they were forcing people back into Iraq.

Al Khafaji finally got a refugee visa after 5 years, a visa he should have got in the beginning.

The real tragedy of Al Kateb that was never reported is that there were three Palestinian families in Baxter with about 7 kids between them who faced their whole lives in detention.

One was born here.

The thing that struck me is that while many in the media are fantastic at getting us the facts, like David is, those who get it wrong never apologise.

How many people in Australia should apologise for the demonising of the kids over board? Or the TAMPA refugees, or the Bakhtiyari kids?

And how many have.

Marion Le put to the Senate committee that a smuggler told Roqia to lie about the village she came from so it would be easier to find her husband, she thought she was going to Germany. DIMA has translated that into "she had ample time to tell us her nationality". Well, she said on 28 January 2001 that she was from Afghanistan and she said it for the next 1445 days but they refused to believe her.

What a surprise and shock it must have been to them when McGeough found the truth.

You see Stuart, McGeough, Marr and Wilkinson don't write opinion - they go and look for facts.

Unlike Greg Sheridan, Andrew Bolt (who mysteriously and happily has banned me), Piers Akerman, Miranda Devine, Janet Albrechtson and Gerard Henderson pass off their own biases and bigotries as "news" and manage to fool some of the people some of the time.

Imagine Andrew Bolt down on his haunches talking to a group of Iraqi Sheikhs for example, or bothering to interview Alamdar Bakhtiyari as an equal in a cafe in Kabul, or bothering to find an elusive cousin.

Wouldn't happen - he just spewed out his usual hatred for those kids as if they were mass murderers and ignored the fact for years that the government always knew the family had been in Pakistan since early 1998, just like every other Afghan family who now live here as refugees.

See Stuart, there are the big mouths who have an opinion they peddle to influence, and there are the news reporters then there are the Grattans, Tingles, Barkers, Ramseys (although I am dark on him still for not apologising to poor Roqia Bakhtiyari for trashing her in 2002 without a trace of evidence for cause), Carney is good value, Seccombe.

Stuart you surely have to see the difference by now.

re: The Omega Scroll

Stuart Lord: "There are at least five examples of his inability to accurately produce a set of facts." You, of all people, wrote that?

Everyone has the right to voice their opinion. However, how that opinion is received and valued depends on the basis on which it is formed. Those that are based on broad research and objective analysis are, or at least should, be, the most valued.

Those that fail those requirements, even to the extent of deliberate fabrication, should be ignored.

Unfortunately, these standards seem to be less valued by the day. You would be aware of that.

Though perhaps all is not lost as this has just appeared in my Inbox:

'A majority of Americans say the indictment of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby signals broader ethical problems in the Bush administration, and nearly half say the overall level of honesty and ethics in the federal government has fallen since President Bush took office, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News survey." (By Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, The Washington Post)

re: The Omega Scroll

G'day. I'm catching up with my Crikey sealed sections, and concur with this editorial by proprietor Eric Beecher on Wednesday. I got out just in time.

Quality Fairfax journalism enters a bloody new era

The dismantlement of Australia's best print journalism is now officially under way. The announcement yesterday by Fairfax that it will remove up to 7.5% of its editorial staff – compulsorily if necessary – is the clearest institutional message so far that quality journalism at Fairfax will be sacrificed to maintain profits, no matter what the societal, political or cultural impact.

Fairfax is a company fixated on commerce, not journalism. Yesterday's announcement – and it won't be the last of its kind – didn't bother to use phrases like "editorial quality" or "commitment to journalism" for one simple reason: those days are over. In the face of a declining business model, the management of what used to be the home of Australia's finest editorial believes it can no longer afford to care about such an indulgence. Max Walsh sums it up perfectly – and ominously – in today's Bulletin.

In a company that doesn't have a proprietor, is run by a board which doesn't have a single day's publishing experience, and is managed by a CEO who has never worked in the media industry, the fate of serious journalism has become precarious.

Yesterday's announcement was pitched simultaneously at several audiences. As well as attempting to impress shareholders ("we'll milk the profits in the short term"), and intimidate staff ("no-one's job is safe, so don't agitate or try to get precious about journalism"), there's also a clear message for a federal government now contemplating changes to dismantle Australia's cross-media laws ("if you don't free us up to get bigger or get bought, expect more editorial blood on the floor").

Over the past five years the Fairfax board and management have presided over a "strategy" that has resulted in systemically declining circulations, a steady migration of its newspaper classifieds to the internet, avoidance of any significant internet acquisitions, and a recalibration of the company's editorial culture.

It's death by a thousand cuts for quality journalism at Fairfax. Yesterday's announcement merely formalised the company's tepid new era:

PROPOSED REDUNDANCY PROGRAM FOR THE METRO PUBLISHING UNIT

SYDNEY, 25 OCTOBER, 2005: – John Fairfax Holdings Limited [ASX:FXJ] has announced to staff at its Sydney and Melbourne metropolitan newspapers – The Sydney Morning Herald, The Sun-Herald and The Age – that the Company is initiating discussions with the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance regarding implementation of a proposed redundancy program for staff at the papers. The proposed targeted redundancy program would encompass approximately 55 editorial employees, or between 6 - 7.5% of editorial staff at the papers. This is coupled with other operating efficiencies, including non-editorial staff reductions that are underway in other parts of the metro publishing business unit. The company will announce the final redundancy provisions to be taken in the accounts for the 2006 financial year if the program proceeds. – ENDS –

Contacts: Bruce Wolpe Director Corporate Affairs +61 9282 3640

re: The Omega Scroll

I just remembered my references. Global War Game. The links are from this page. Global War Game: Second Series, 1984–1988, by Robert H. Gile (2004). Global War Game: The First Five Years, by Bud Hay and Bob Gile (June 1993).

General Anthony Cordsman's work can be found here. Find out what really happened in all these middle east wars. No spin writing.

Australian Military Journals (I actually have a letter from Sen Hill saying they will pull their finger out and try to publish on time and not 1 year late. (Even Fairfax can meet deadlines.) Australian Army Journal. Australian Defence Force Journal.

Americian Journals: see why torture is a good thing, though most seem to disagree, here, here, here, here.

re: The Omega Scroll

Alan Ramsey and Ross Gittins are my favourites. Alan for passion and Ross for anti spin. I respect any non spin viewpoint even if I disagree. I'm contemptous of any spin even if I agree.

I'm sure I read the word Quaker at the Penguin site about Adrian. I wondered how a Quaker calls himself Brigadier (we need spell checking in the text box).

I read just the other day that Ukraine is thinking of or America wants it to join NATO. This may start a big war, a real war. A nuclear war perhaps. If I was Russian I'd go to war. America has been encircling both Russia and Iran (or both together as they share a border). This is empire building. Perhaps the real reason for the Iraq war.

It has forced Russia to decide they like the chinese. The Russians are great military thinkers (you can read their journal translated here and are not dumb.

James Waterton, 30 years ago I was a member of the State Emergency Service's Ïntelligence/Scientific branch. We plotted fallout and calculated dosages for evacuation. If your total dose was more than 100 r you were declared Black and left to die.

I suppose they still do this stuff. To this day I prepare for nuclear war. I know exactly what I'm going to do for my block of flats or workplace. I have emergency food supplies (only 1 week, I'm not mad - but one should have 2 weeks).

So I see preparation as a lot more than for a suitcase bomb. After all blow it up in the city and as long as the wind isn't NW I'll live - a suitcase bomb is nothing compared to a real one.

With America's constant goading of Russia, China, Nth Korea, and Iran (all nuclear or near nuclear) I get worried again.

And can one trust all the above not to do something as America threaten them with war and/or containment. Of course one thing China or Russia may do is nuke America's allies and give the yanks a choice of retaliating against Russia/China and their retalitation for that.

The Americians ran a series of war games some time ago (can't remember the details but it was with high level officials) and the lesson the learnt was that Russia can nuke lots of things to hurt Amrerica without the americians being able to retaliate (for fear of all out nuclear war). The carriers were favourites Russians (played by americians targets. Allies were also targets I think.

I'd image a dud nuke still may go critical and have a meltdown like 3 mile island. If the two halves join you have a lots of radiation.

So I don't think the risk is zero.

You make a point that resources are limited. That's true. Conventional war (and we are in two at the moment) is far more likely. But the low chance risks shouldn't be totally ignored.

re: The Omega Scroll

A few points. Welcome back Margo. Here's hoping I run into you sometime in Canberra whilst I am there for the last sitting period of the year-maybe we can watch the fireworks that will hopefully be happening if there is any justice left in the world, together :]

As the schizophrenic contributions from the Webdiary community attest, in the main, not all of us in the ALP have two heads or no brain :] Tony Bourke being the most obvious example. Others of us are continuing to fight the good fight, against enormous odds, but, we prefer to take the long view, rather than succumb to short-termism and keep on batting away in an attempt to bring the side back into contention.

Please could others believe this too because we are not all apparatchiks and mindless machine morons or in it for what we can get out of it. Like Webdiary, we are swimming against the tide but are determined to get upstream to spawn and propagate !

An update that I have read just recently on Plamegate is that even though there has only been one indictment by the Special Prosecutor, do not despair, others will get their comeuppance as a result of the same machinations which ultimately brought Bill Clinton down. That is, a Civil suit is being prepared by Joe and Valerie Wilson for loss of earnings etc. as a result of her outing as a CIA Agent and his loss of reputation and because, in the Paula Jones civil action the Republicans created a precedent and forced Clinton to testify, thus will Bush be forced to testify in the Plame/Wilson case.

The ultimate delicious irony, which will go all the way to the next election, or Bush's impeachment over lying to Congress over reasons for going to War in Iraq, whichever comes first. Unless, of course, they are more diabolical than sweet reason might normally suggest-and you just can never tell with this lot [which includes our own personal bete noir, Chairman of the IDU and Margaret Thatcher Fan Club, John Winston Howard].

Stay tuned on Webdiary.

Margo: hope you are looking after your health, apropos your comments earlier in the year about needing/wanting to give up smoking.

Margo: Yep, I'd love to meet you Victoria. As for smoking, it's yet another New Year's Resolution.

re: The Omega Scroll

I've nothing to say about the Omega Scroll or even journalism, except congratulations to Margo and the team for the job done so far and especially the press gallery pass.

But I did want to correct slightly something Marilyn said. As far as I know (and my last news was late last week) Al Khafaji is still waiting for his protection visa. After three years of the prime of his life in detention, he has spent another two and a half on the uncertainties of a bridging visa without permission to work, living very frugally on gifts. The RRT finally recognised his refugee status some months ago (whereas the UNHCR had recognised this from the start), but between DIMIA's left hand and right hand the result has so far only been further delay. He is now facing a significant health problem without access to Medicare.

re: The Omega Scroll

Thanks Robyn. I haven't seen Abbas for some time and wondered if the rumours of his visa were true. I know that he was accepted months ago. I guess the stupid hold up now is "security" checks. I will try and find him this week as I guess he will need some help.

He's so decent and kind, I wish this stupid government would just give him his damn life back. He was at his funniest the night the Bakhtiyari kids were released from Baxter - even came into the pub with us.

re: The Omega Scroll

Hi Margo. You wrote, "I've always been a bit of a loner in my profession, often feeling I was fighting on all fronts."

Like others on this thread, I support you. I don't have the wherewithal to go out and do it publicly. We met briefly when you signed my copy of Not Happy John in Manuka. Never forget that when you go about your business you are representing many others. Like Keith0 I rarely visit the SMH website these days, whereas it used to be a main port of call when Webdiary was there.

I turn 51 in a couple of weeks' time. Throughout my youth and middle age I saw the world as gradually improving, from the nadir of Auschwitsch a few years before I was born, to the fall of the Berlin Wall, the freeing of Mandela and the independence of South Africa not so long ago. I had hope. What is going on now politically and environmentally only leads me to despair. We may have next to no chance of changing any of that, but at least let's go down protesting that it could have been different.

Margo: Hi MA. Don't lose hope, please.

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo, in the 'not extreme or inane' I would usually say Gerald Henderson, Paul Sheehan, Peter Hartcher, Michael Duffy, Elizabeth Knight, Michael Gordon. Pamela Bone seems to be starting to make a lot more sense to a lot more people (after the 7/7 bombings and her conversion from multiculturalism to integration) and Sushi Das - even though I don't agree with her sometimes, I do like her method and style.

And I would say that some of those I mentioned earlier would be liked by many who read the SMH. Probably a majority. The issue is that majority is part of an overall pool that is a lot smaller than it used to be. It can be liked by the majority of it's readers, but if it keeps on declining in numbers, that majority who like those columnists may well not be enough to keep the paper fully viable.

We are seeing the beginning of that now. The Herald Sun has been building up its columists to take over the 'leading opinion' paper in Melbourne from The Age (not especially hard when so many more read the Sun) for some time now (about a year ago there were only two real opinion journalists, now there are more than a dozen), and I wouldn't be surprised if the Tele started doing the same.

So what can they do? Well, apart from getting in a better management with a better understanding of the business, trying to regain both a large and broad readership would help.

Marilyn Shepherd, all I see with McGeough is a 'potential for civil war' under every single rock regarding Iraq (including a 'possible cause for civil war' after every election, and he puts a negative spin on elections anyway), something which even Robert Fisk has stridently denied is happening. Once or twice I could understand, 17 or so times and counting and I can't. Whether he writes facts or not, his opinion is skewed well off in this matter, which leads me to doubts in other areas as well.

Margo: You're right about the Herald Sun build. For example, when Age editor Andrew Jaspan folded the business section, The Age lost one of its most experienced and respected journalists and editors, Malcolm Schmidke, to the HS to, you guessed it, build up its business section! Malcolm would have been a top choice for Jaspan's job. The SMH and Age editor-in-chief Mark Scott - that's right, Sydney now runs Melbourne officially - was one of those responsbile for the disasterous Japsan appointment. He got a bonus for running down the two metros, and is now overseeing the sackings. I mean, where do these people get off!

re: The Omega Scroll

Welcome back Margo. I have a less sympathetic, rather irreverent take on the mass firing of journalists working for mainstream media.

Like petrol price rises, I tend to rejoice when I see it happen. It’s the bitter medicine we need.

In the most unlikely event that I have any influence over Howard’s successor as Australia’s dictator-in-lurking, who will presumably also enjoy enabling laws and have a very 'liberal' industrial relations regime tucked under his/her belt, I may advise firing ALL journalists working for the mass media.

What’s more, I’d ban the employment of journalists in aggregations of more than 20 – and ban private ownership of enterprises employing journalists. In my new Australia, journalists would work only as independents or small, autonomous teams. No journalistic copy could ever be juxtaposed with advertising; I’d break that sorry nexus, which first led to the rise of mass-circulation newspapers owned by media ‘barons’ in the late 19th century, followed by the professional pap dispensers aka ‘commercial TV’ in our era.

I admit that if forced to run this as a sequential program, I'd end (not start) with the nice folk at Fairfax, but as Kurt Vonnegut says “so it goes". Perhaps it’s best the whole lot goes at once. Like daylight saving. One day it’s there, next day it isn’t.

This policy would have a number of beneficial effects:

(a) first and foremost, it would end any remaining illusions that we live in a society with a free and responsible media (when it is, in fact, controlled by a handful of individuals and interest groups and persistently replays misleading spin and faulty analysis on the most crucial issues of our time).

(b) it would force thousands of hacks to find real jobs and/or reduce their material consumption, while genuine journalists would need to find innovative new ways of funding their passion - as you are doing at Webdiary.

(c) the population, starved of a daily torrent of 'information' of worse than dubious quality about the world around them, would be required to get out or boot up and search for information - in the process making contact and forging bonds with genuine journalists. This would help the highest goals of journalism to rise to the surface: accurate reporting, wise comment and the facilitation of informed debate. Hacks would wallow off and find something else to do.

(d) media barons would still be free to sell entertainment and advertisements, as they currently do, to anyone silly enough to pay for them. Most people would find better ways to procure information to help satisfy their needs. Anyone wishing to turn on the television to watch entertainment and ads can do so. But no mixing business and pleasure. Above all, no pretence of journalism in the mass media!

A couple of loose ends…

Would I really include ABC journalists in this mass sacking? 'Your' ABC? (I can hear the whimpers that this is going too far!)

Short Answer: Yes.

In my opinion, no institution in Australia more effectively fosters the illusion of a free, investigative and responsible mass media, than 'Our' ABC. The Lite version of official propaganda, I now believe, to be more deadly than the Fox.

Second, what about the torrent of overseas media we already receive. Should that be banned also? Isn't that draconian?

Answer: No ban on overseas media, but access fees on a sliding scale.

I agree it’s important that Australians can see what the world sees - and be cognizant of the torrent of BS to which our overseas kin are subjected. I’d be innovative, and employ Webdiary on a standard, Haliburton-style no-bid contract to keep track of the lies and nonsense perpetrated by each overseas TV service available in this country (that's the world’s media folks - a juicy lurk indeed!). Each channel would be scored, based on the quanta of identifiable and significant lies perpetrated over the course of a month. The monthly licence fee to access each channel would then reflect its tally. Put crudely: a tax on lies.

Under such a scheme, it would still be possible to view overseas-made dissembling nonsense, but most people would find it too expensive, like Havana cigars.

JFK indicated a desire to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces shortly before his death apparently at the hand of a crazed lone assassin who shortly afterwards met his own death at the hands of a gangster nicknamed Jack Ruby.

I think that's an appropriate metaphor for what should be done here.

Let's smash the Australian mass media into a thousand pieces and regain a real free market in our ideas industry.

Who’d care to put their heads up and say so?

re: The Omega Scroll

Margo why did he pick Jaspan? Any clues why they brought in someone from overseas? Margo: Something do do with breaking the culture, what was left of it, is my guess.

I have become increasingly annoyed with The Age, which was a paper I used to enjoy enormously now rarely buy.

Stuart, you think Henderson is not asinine? God you are a worry, guess it comes from "working in tax" which has not got much to do with humans.

Actually Stuart the sunnis' and shi'ites are slaughtering each other in great numbers in their own country - I reckon that is a civil war don't you?

But then of course Stuart, you work in safe Australia doing tax so of course you know much more than the foreign correspondents putting themselves in danger don't you?

Robyn, our boy Abbas got a visa on Friday. Hooray, finally.

re: The Omega Scroll

Marilyn Shepherd, If it was civil war, the world would know about it. The Congo had a civil war. Russia had a civil war. The US had a civil war. Iraq has a bunch of desperate Baathist thugs and jihadist wannabe's trying to provoke a civil war, and failing. Even the Sunni turnout at the last election shows that they are realising that participation is better than violence in having your views heard and being represented in the power base.

And as for working in tax - I have to deal with people every day. And no, it's not all about numbers either. Gross generalisation it might be, but inaccurate. But I guess that wouldn't bother you. Oh, and it keeps my maths up to a good standard. How is yours going, by the by? Is 40% still a majority?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2006 - 2008, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of Webdiary Pty Ltd.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.

Margo Kingston

Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Advertisements