Wayne is still in some transition explaining this new development to his traditional subscribers, so today we still have only an excerpt, but a much better one. Thanks Wayne!
2 Terrorism, the left and
an open society
Because terrorism is a threat, it doesn't mean draconian laws are the
only justified response. Because Saddam was a monster, it doesn't automatically
follow that the invasion of Iraq was justified. But they are the kinds of black
and white, all or nothing alternatives most politicians and commentators offer
(especially among the generally lame bunch of opinion writers on offer in
Australia). Which is what makes Sasha Abramsky's article (link below) a rare
bird indeed. Abramsky is, we are told, a senior fellow for democracy at Demos
and a writer for Mother Jones, Atlantic Monthly, The American Prospect, the
Nation and other journals. Abramsky takes issue with the approach of figures
like Tariq Ali, Robert Fisk, George Galloway, Naomi Klein, and John Pilger (but
does not support the neo-conservative approach) and argues that the left has yet
to come up with a response to terrorism that protects both progressive values
and life and property. (And given the number of links in this piece, it is one
you could dine out on all day.) "In terms of laws to tackle terrorism, instead
of activists denouncing any and all special legal powers granted courts and
governments in this fight, how about acknowledging that organised terrorism does
pose certain tricky legal questions and, from there, attempt to craft responses
that, unlike those proposed by the right, don't result in the creation of legal
black holes for terrorism suspects? How about, for example, recognising that in
wartime there might be legitimate grounds for pre-emptively detaining a person
for a prescribed and limited period of time on a suspicion of plotting a major
attack, while still denouncing the notion that such a person doesn't have the
right to an attorney or to a speedy trial?"
The Independent has just
published another extract from Robert
Fisk's book, "The Great War for Civilisation" (with links beside
this article to other extracts).
Christopher Hitchens gets a couple of
mentions from Abramsky, who rightly points out his failure to respond adequately
to the failure of the US on the ground in Iraq (frankly, until he does, Hitchens
does not deserve his self-proclaimed status as a "contrarian" - he has become a
knee-jerk neo-con). Here is his response to the Bali bombings (also run
in today's Age) which attacks the left (of course) and implies that the only
response to terrorism is to bomb some sense into them.
SASHA
ABRAMSKY/OPENDEMOCRACY
3 The women of
Afghanistan
The
most courageous people alive have to be women standing up to take their rightful
place in countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Pakistan. Elizabeth Rubin
has reported extensively from those countries and in this article, looks at what
is now happening in Afghanistan where 68 of the 249 seats in the new parliament
are reserved for women. This is a longer magazine article, but worth it. "On the
western outskirts of Kabul, in a neighborhood still scarred by the mujahedeen
rockets that tore apart Kabul during the civil war 10 years ago, Shukria
Barakzai stepped from a silver Mercedes to greet a few dozen women waiting for
her in the garden of a neighborhood elder. Though she's one of Kabul's
higher-profile women - she started a newspaper called Women's Mirror shortly
after the Taliban fell and often appears on political talk shows in bright,
translucent headscarves and high-heeled, pointy pink or ivory shoes - on this
day she had the air of a schoolgirl breaking taboos. A few days earlier, at the
official start of campaign season, she took an unprecedented move for Afghan
women and went wading through a crowded bazaar to address men and women,
shopkeepers and taxi drivers and the police. She was thrilled by it. She also
must have enjoyed the fact that it irritated her husband, and that there was
nothing he could do about it."
NYTIMES
MAGAZINE
4 Bush, tax cuts and
conservatism
This one is a late inclusion, having been obliged to read John Stone's
opinion piece in The Australian today (see below, but only read if you must). It
also fits in neatly with the split between George Bush and fiscal, small
government conservatives, a subject TDB began following before the last US
election. Robert Samuelson, a centre-right commentator, looks at Bush's approach
to the economy from both that perspective and simply as a question of good
governance. An underlying theme of the column is Bush's legacy, and given what
is happening to the US budget, in Iraq and on issues like corruption and
cronyism, it is hard at this stage to see any section of the political spectrum
remembering him well.
To add to the White House's woes, "the special
prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case has summoned Karl
Rove, the senior White House adviser, to return next week to
testify to a federal grand jury in a step that could mean there will be charges
filed in the case, lawyers in the case said today". (NYTimes)
And anger among
conservatives at his Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers is also
said to be growing. (NYTimes)
ROBERT SAMUELSON/THE
WASHINGTON POST
5 Limits placed on
military torture
In the face of resistance from the White House and threats of a veto by
George Bush, the US Senate has voted to "impose restrictions on the treatment of
terrorism suspects, delivering a rare wartime rebuke to President Bush". The
move was driven in Congress by Republican Senator John McCain, and supported by
a large number of retired senior military figures, including former Secretary of
State Colin Powell. Outside the legislature, no-one did more to bring some
semblance of sanity and decency to the treatment of prisoners than columnist and
blogger Andrew Sullivan (follow the link and
scroll down). Sullivan vigorously supported the war and argued that torture and
prisoner abuse was undermining it. His blog includes a copy of Powell's letter
to McCain and he also names (and shames) the Senators who voted against the
measure, adding "Keep this list. And tell your children and grandchildren."
THE WASHINGTON
POST
6 UK economy and world
house prices
The Times economics editor Anatole Kaletsky sees troubled times ahead for
the British economy, a situation made worse he argues, by the failures of
Chancellor (and likely Prime Minister) Gordon Brown. "Monetary policy is also in
limbo. Lower interest rates are, in principle, the best way to stimulate
consumption and accelerate economic growth. And sometime next year the Bank of
England probably will cut rates quite sharply, perhaps all the way back to their
2003 low of 3.5 per cent. But the Bank is proving surprisingly slow and
reluctant in cutting interest rates and this hesitancy can partly be blamed on
Mr Brown's mistakes".
TDB has noticed recently reports that UK house
prices have fallen considerably, but couldn't find the link in this morning's
rush. Given the degree to which world economic growth has been fuelled by
consumer spending driven by the international boon in house prices, two other
reports on the subject might be of interest. In Lebanon, the The Daily Star
reports that "three years of booming conditions in the region's
real estate sector, several markets appear to have entered over valued levels"
and house prices are expected to fall. And the NYTimes says that a real estate
slowdown that began in a handful of cities this summer has spread
to almost every hot housing market in the country, including New York.
The International Herald Tribune reports that European governments were
moving late Wednesday to defuse one of the most serious
trade fights between the European Union and the United States,
examining moves to suspend state funding to the Airbus A350, a planned rival to
Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner.
ANATOLE KALETSKY/THE
TIMES
7 Climate change kills
millions
When
TDB started last year, an effort was made to report both sides of the climate
change debate. But it didn't take too long to realise that the sceptics were few
in number, making tendentious arguments unsupported by science, and were often
taking cash for comment from the fossil fuel industry. Since then, the very
mention of the words "but more study is needed to know exactly what action to
take" is likely to bring on blind fury given the scale of the problem and the
direct threat it poses to millions of people, usually the poorest and most
vulnerable. Send this article, based on a World Bank report (that'd be that
bunch of lefties headed up by Paul Wolfowitz) to the next denier you run across.
"Almost a fifth of all ill health in poor countries and millions of deaths can
be attributed to environmental factors, including climate change and pollution,
according to a report from the World Bank. Unsafe water, poor sanitation and
hygiene as well as indoor and outdoor air pollution are all said to be killing
people and preventing economic development. In addition, says the bank,
increasing soil pollution, pesticides, hazardous waste and chemicals in food are
significantly affecting health and economies."
THE GUARDIAN
8 Being happy in
Bhutan
Does the
US "strike you as a happy country?" the NYTimes asked in an editorial
yesterday (the pursuit of happiness gets a mention in the
constitution after all.) Well, frankly no. The question was prompted by a report
by Andrew Revkin (link below) on Bhutan, where in 1972, "Bhutan's newly crowned
leader, King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, decided to make his nation's priority not
its G.D.P. but its G.N.H., or gross national happiness". Revkin reports that
Bhutan has become a model for "a growing number of economists, social
scientists, corporate leaders and bureaucrats" around the world who are
interested in the subject. (TDB has folowed this debate with interest since
becoming aware of Professor Richard Layard's
book on it and you'll find other links in archives.)
ANDREW
REVKIN/NYTIMES
9 Wine, petrol and
dangerous bicycle seats
In the light of the ethanol debate here, an interesting
report (link below) on what is happening in Europe, where petrol is meant to
contain 5.75 percent ethanol by 2010. "The worldwide glut of wine has become so
huge that for the first time in history, France is distilling some of its
higher-rated wines into fuel. It is a painful proposition in a land where
winemaking is a labor of love and the fruit of that labor is celebrated as much
as any art."
Still on transport, and alternative transport, the NYTimes
also reports that men should be careful when
choosing a bicycle seat. A raft of new studies "add to earlier
evidence that traditional bicycle saddles, the kind with a narrow rear and
pointy nose, play a role in s*xual impotence". (That got your attention.)
NYTIMES
10 The news from al
Qaeda
"And,
from Guantánamo today, still another report that Muslim prisoners there are
being subjected to barbaric tortures. The report, due out tomorrow from Martyrs
Without Borders, the respected humanitarian agency, says these include being
made to listen to 'Purimspiel' klezmer music twenty-four hours a day and being
forced to watch the Barbra Streisand movie 'Yentl' while immersed up to the neck
in chicken soup. Several prisoners have reportedly beheaded themselves rather
than endure more of these unspeakable horrors."
And if you need another
laugh, if might come from Joel Achenbach's response
(Washington Post) to the NYTimes decision to hide its columnists behind a
pay-to-view wall. "Last night a friend handed over two pieces of paper
containing words that I quickly recognized to be one of the most precious
commodities in the current information marketplace: The Maureen Dowd column. A
black market printout. This was like the samizdat of the Soviet dissidents."
CHRISTOPHER BUCKLEY/THE
NEW YORKER
11 'Early Music' by
Jeffrey Eugenides
For those who have time to spare, a (longish) short story by Jeffrey
Eugenides, author of "The Virgin Suicides" and "Middlesex".
THE NEW YORKER
12 IN THE PAPERS:
National, Opinion, Business round-up IN THE
BROADSHEETS
What looks like a first-rate piece of journalism
leads The Australian this morning as it reveals that John Howard won the support
of timber workers for his vote-winning Tasmanian forests policy just three days
before last year's election with an agreement to pay $4 million to
a union-controlled company. (Drop the mad culture wars agenda
fellas, and stick to great reporting.) The paper also reports that five elite
police teams began scouring the Indonesian archipelago by helicopter yesterday
as the hunt for senior members of the Bali terror network was stepped up after
the first suicide bomber was
identified; that the NSW Supreme Court has bowed to criticism
over its six-week summer shutdown, introducing an "experiment" of opening its courts two weeks
earlier than normal (an issue pursued by the paper); a leading
IVF specialist who allegedly had an affair with one of his
patients shortly before she discovered she was pregnant is facing
a $250,000 damages claim from the woman's former husband; that plans to introduce 99-year
leases for land on Northern Territory Aboriginal communities to
enable people to own their own homes are supported by an all-party committee of
the Queensland parliament; and that a Sydney man has won a four-year battle
against global entertainment giant Sony after the High Court yesterday found backyard modifications to
games consoles that allow pirated or overseas games to be played
are legal.
The Age lead says Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone has absolved
herself of responsibility after her department's handling of the
Vivian Alvarez Solon case was branded "catastrophic" in a damning independent
report. Michelle
Grattan is seriously unimpressed - "Just when you think Amanda
Vanstone can't get more outrageous, she does."
The paper also reports
that more than $15 million in public money was pledged to
dodgy projects before last year's election under a controversial
regional grants scheme, a 10-month probe into the program has concluded; that
traces of genetically modified canola
have been found in seeds bought by a Wimmera farmer, signifying a
possible breach of Victoria's ban on commercial GM crops; and that abusive
behaviour and bullying in the military will
be stamped on, and out, the chief of the defence forces Air Chief
Marshal Angus Houston has vowed.
The Herald reports that motorists using
the Cross City Tunnel could be charged different
tolls depending on the time of their journey as one of several
options being explored to lift sluggish use of the toll road; that from today it
will be legal for your bosses to trace
your internet use, screen your emails and watch you with a hidden
camera - but only after they have warned you what they are up to first; that
more than 30,000 families failed to
repay overpayments of the Federal Government's child-care benefit
last year, a 3000 per cent increase on the number of people who did not make
their repayments just three years earlier; and that broadcaster Alan Jones and
his station, 2GB, defamed the head of the Australian Olympic Committee, John
Coates, seven times in less than three
minutes last December, a jury has found.
And did you know
that biscuit lovers in India, although not Australia, will soon be munching the
world's first Don Bradman Chocolate Chip
Cookies; or that it may one day be possible to be part of a personal carbon credit trading
scheme; or that for one junkie, being deported to Italy was a
blessing (nice little yarn); or that scientists have stumbled on
the remains of a four-metre python that
exploded when it tried to swallow a two-metre alligator whole in
Florida.
OPINION
The Age: Hugh MacKay
considers the various ways humans respond to terrorism and warns against trying
to distance ourselves from terrorists by promoting the idea that they are
fanatical beyond understanding; Tony Parkinson
looks at the debate over Turkey becoming a member of the EU; Alexander
Downer says that Australia has failed to support governments in
the region to fight terrorism and that he is therefore resigning as Foreign
Minister (actually I made that last bit up - it seems we are doing a wonderful,
wonderful job and Alexander has the facts and figures to prove it); and Christopher
Hitchens on the Bali bombings, see above.
The
Australian: Frank Devine
(in semi-retirement one of our most readable columnists) likes the idea of
voluntary voting (as many conservatives do); Dennis
Shanahan, a conservative Catholic, talks down more public funding
for embryonic stem cells research in the lead up to another Parliamentary
debate; Sidney Jones
says terrorism is a complex issue that Indonesia is making a good fist of
combating; Michael
Costello has a three point plan for rejuvenating the ALP (but we
wonder if three is enough); John Stone,
once a Joh-for-PM team member criticises Peter Costello for daring to attack
George Bush's tax cuts for the rich - even though Bush's economic performance is
attacked the world over, not least by US conservatives (why does The Australian
bother with this clapped out old has-been - are there really no bright young
economic minds the paper could foster as a commentator); and Kevin Rudd has
some questions, but nothing much else, for John Howard on Iraq (a nothing piece,
but The Australian does like this Queensland Labor right types: Rudd, Emerson,
Ross Fitzgerald and to a lesser extent Swan - there is a story to all
that.)
The SMH: Richard Ackland
has a little gem for anyone interested in journalism, the jailing of Judith
Miller, shield laws and connoisseurs of fine nicknames (if you don't know who
"T*rd Blossom" is, you should read TDB more closely); David Marr says
Kevin Andrews is about to let a few businessmen in on some of the details of the
proposed industrial relations laws, and that in the interests of considered
public debate, it is time everyone knew the details; Tim Grau enters
the debate over university funding full of praise for Brendan Nelson's call for
private investment; Dennis Overbye
explains why a scientific debate may mean that my very easy memory jingle may no
longer seem useful naming planets (what is and what is not a planet).
BUSINESS
The Australian and The Age both lead
with the obvious story, the stockmarket fall, with the national daily reporting
that anxious investors kept their fingers on the sell button yesterday, plunging
the market to a second consecutive 2 per
cent-plus loss, the worst day for the All Ordinaries since
September 12, 2001. Only the SMH looks elsewhere, reporting that BHP Billiton
yesterday pulled out of a conditional agreement to buy gas from the long-delayed $4 billion Papua
New Guinea gas pipeline.
The Herald also reports that
Geoff Kleemann, Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd's chief financial officer,
yesterday said he could not recall who attended three crucial One.Tel board
meetings in May 2001, just days before the telco
collapsed; and that expectations of widespread redundancies at
Telstra were bolstered yesterday by a Citigroup report that said 9000 jobs could go as the
telecom streamlines its operations around an all-IP (internet
protocol) network.
The Australian reports that a trade sale worth up to
$500 million to Kerry Packer or Telstra's Sensis division may overtake plans by
online accommodation site wotif.com for a public listing early
next year; and that Macquarie Bank, has teamed up with the
world's biggest share registry group, Melbourne-based Computershare, for a tilt at the London Stock
Exchange.
The Age reports that Seven boss David Leckie has
taken advantage of the company's soaring share price to lock in a paper profit of
about $2.4 million through an exercise of options he received
when he joined the then embattled network in 2003; and that restaurants and cafes are
being hit hard as consumers tighten their belts because of
escalating petrol prices and mounting negative economic sentiment.
Stephen
Bartholomeusz looks at Macquarie Bank's bid for the London Stock
Exchange and there is nothing unrealistic about it, even if it comes as a shock
to the Brits; Elizabeth
Knight thinks there is little doubt that, even if the market
isn't undergoing a correction this week - or even this month - it will do so
some time in the near to medium term; and Bryan Frith
continues to show his fascination with Lion Nathan's hostile takeover bid for
Coopers Brewery.
STATE ROUND-UP
The Daily
Telegraph: The death of a 3-year-old boy - killed by a modified
4WD on an ordinary suburban street - has prompted calls for an immediate ban on
the vehicles; Police hunting the Bali bombers are investigating claims the three
suicide bombers took three women with them when they visited the crime scenes at
lunchtime on the day of the attacks.
The Herald-Sun: A private army of 5000
security guards and a new network of spy cameras will help safeguard athletes
and fans during the Commonwealth Games; Everyone who lives or works above the
13th floor in Melbourne should consider buying an escape parachute in case of a
terror attack, Victoria's former top cop says.
The Courier-Mail: Police are being given
the green light to charge Jayant Patel with killing and maiming Bundaberg
Hospital patients; Hotels could be commandeered by the Government and used as
quarantine centres under state bird flu contingency plans.
The Advertiser:
Premier Mike Rann is coasting toward a landslide victory at the March state
election, an Advertiser poll showing the Liberals heading for an electoral
wipeout; Prime Minister John Howard today will announce more than $60 million
worth of South Australian water conservation projects.
The West Australian: A cancer
gene test developed in Perth to help children with leukaemia could boost the
chances of survival in patients with breast cancer, melanoma and bowel cancer;
The State Government will create a new department with sole responsibility for
water resources in a radical shake-up of WA's water management.
The Mercury:
More officers and wider powers would be needed to enforce the shutdown of
Tasmanian brothels, the police union warned yesterday; An outbreak of
potentially deadly salmonella poisoning has led to the closure of two Launceston
bakeries.
SPORT
Peter Roebuck
thinks Graeme Smith and company must have been disconcerted by the energy shown
by the Australians in their first meeting with the Rest of the World (and he's
mightily impressed by Shane Watson); Brendan Fevola will remain with
Carlton in 2006 following Richmond's decision to give up its
pursuit of the spearhead; Roger Federer's spellbinding brand of tennis will
again be on show at January's
lead-up event to the Australian Open. |
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Dennis Shanahan's opinion piece, which compared the unfunded research into stomach ulcers with the supposedly overfunded stem cell research, missed the connection: Nobel prize winner Barry Marshall is a member of the Lockhart review committee.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Here is a link to Julie Bishop's Lockhart review committee appointment announcement dated 17 June 2005.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Thanks for pointing that out Andy, I wasn't aware of it myself. This is one of my hopes for the collaboration with Webdiary - that it will bring in connections, suggestions for articles of interest, and background material of all sorts that will help to make us all more aware and better informed consumers of the media we are normally asked to swallow at face value. Helping to provide that for busy big-brained people, who don't have time to keep up with who is who in the media zoo, was one of the motivations for setting TDB up. But it is unrealistic to think you can do cover all bases on your own. Thanks again.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
The Friday 'Review' section of Financial Review for Oct 7th has a superb essay by Mira
Crouch, 'Beyond the Lucifer effect', on the events at Abu Ghraib. She cites an expert in the psychology of imprisonment, Phillip Zimbardo. Here's a snippet:
I wonder who this pictorial newcomer is aimed at? Al Qaeda posts weekly news bulletinhere. There's more detail at Second Broadcast of "The Voice of the Caliphate"here.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Now here’s a funny thing 8/10/15 Bernard Rochlin:
“Do Australian women have the right to wander on Cape York Peninsula and can they sit next to a drain in a Lismore park without some busybody not minding their own business? If those two persons were male those busibodies would have had second thoughts.”
Then it’s gone…
Good Christ, Bernard, we’d hope that any mentally-ill or injured or otherwise ill Australian, man, woman, or duck, could be free to roam Cape York or perch next to a drain anywhere. Or even post on Tomb Bair, baying at the moon…
In all cases, if needed, they should get help from decent medical services and authorities.
That is, NOT be penned up or deported by a corrupt extremist gang* bred by the PM’s private office, supported by the clanging empty vessels of the chirruping and doltish extreme Right, vacuous grins agape, limp wrists flapping as they tug at their….parts. Back to the Tomb, Howard-Fellators. Keep the drool running.
* the gang cultivated under glass by Australia’s creepy-crawly chief law officer, and former immigration minister.
That last para’s for the unfortunate lad whose values are derived entirely from the ideological posturing of Howardism-Hansonism, and all the baggage and goosestepping that goes with it. And that includes the dogwhistle bigotry.
But wait…there’s more!
Does the Comrie Report, signal the beginning of the end, maybe like the US far Right’s crumbling at the Army McCarthy hearings?
We won’t get something like that just yet, with a Right extremist double parliamentary majority.
That remains intact thanks to a fanatical corps of hardline bully-boys in the PM’s “private” office and his NSW Liberal Party Brownshirt faction.
Sadly, it’s all happening at a time of great moral and intellectual weakness in the National Party. Aren’t those regional rorts instructive in studying the Libs’ bribery techniques?
The mob which nearly 20 years ago in the person of Queensland’s amiable, bucolic Police Minister, Bill Gunn, grew a spine.
It ultimately ousted the decades-old corrupt and evil Bjelke madness of the 60s and 70s.
Again, it was through an inquiry – Gunn appointed Royal Commissioner Tony Fitzgerald QC. Warning web-page courtesy Brisbane Courier Mail is insanely self-parodying.
http://thecouriermail.com.au/extras/oq/book3bestworst.html
Could today’s National Party, swinging Bill Gunn’s sort of anatomy, bring a US Congressional sense of inquiry to Australia’s Senate, or even the House of Representatives?
Coincidentally, rationalist economists of the 80s and 90s spoke hopefully of a legendary J-curve.
In the 21st century, all we hear the endless out-there tedious Right religiosity of Hollywood’s J-lo-brow and fervid Howard fellators. Do they swallow or spit on those passionate nights off at the Lodge?
Does this explain Noelene’s mysterious absence?
And do they get paid in PPQs, as aids to their dullard polemics?
We’re not all J Winston Jay-lo conga-lines.
Peter “Not a J Winston Jay-lo conga-line” Woodforde
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Have to say the 'humour' about the torture of people in Abu Ghraib sounded incredibly bad taste and racist.
Reminds me of Ali G, who is really a Mr Cohen. Did you know his Masters thesis was on the effect of media presentation of an ethnic group upon how that group is percieved by society? That is why his character is Ali not Ely. Racist again.
One can joke about one's own ethnic group's foibles but when one derides one's enemy and pretends it is innocent humour it should be outed for what it is.
If a Moslem did characatures and sendups of a Jew it would be stopped, just as it was in France even though it was a Jewish Frenchman from memory.
Moslems are the current vulnerable ethnic group in our societies and as such there should be the greatest of sensitivity when there is media portrayal or humour regarding them. It is a Christian duty not to kick people when they are down, but to be the good samaritan and help them up and tend their hurts. How little we hear love thy enemy, not that I personally think of others as enemies because of their religion, but some of the very self-righteous might like to think of that before their next tirade or little joke.
Cheers
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
South Asian Earthquake from the SMH
Toll soars: 30,000 feared dead in Kashmir
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Angela, I agree that we should never let a racist or sexist moment go by, which is why I'm breaking my self-imposed rule about not responding (too) often to posts to respond to yours.
Racism is heinous, and even in its day-to-day impacts, it is murderous (it is a factor in high suicide rates among minoriy groups). For that reason though, the charge of racism should not be devalued by being thrown around lightly, which can look like moral vanity (mere posturing to cloak yourself in 'holier than thou' virtue). And of course the charge is too often made not in an effort to combat racism, but to close down debate by applying the label to someone with whom one disagrees.
Your post, in effect, accuses Christopher Buckley of writing a racist article, The New Yorker of having published a racist article, and myself of having promoted a racist article as being a 'laugh'. That is an extraordinarily serious series of charges to make, and you must, having done that, treat it with great seriousness by deconstructing the article in question and explain precisely and specifically why it is racist.
You say the article "sounds" racist, which iimplies you have not read it in full. Your post adds to that impression. If that is the case, it is an extraordinarily irresponible thing to have done and deeply offensive. And if that is the case, you have done the anti-racism cause you purport to serve some damage.
If you make your case, I will respond to it. For now I'll simply say that I enjoyed the article as great satire on the murderous thugs who make up al Qaeda, on the overblown language they use, and on some of the outrageous abuses perpetrated by US. I think New Yorker is one of the finest magazines in the world, with a proud record in exposing both racism and the abhorrent practices at Abu Ghraib (which, you may recall, was uncovered by that great investigative journalist Seymour Hersh in this very magazine.)
For my part if I have helped perpetrate racist sentiments I will apologise and withdraw that article from The Daily Briefings archives.
Oh, and I enjoy the work of Sasha Baron Cohen (Ali G) enormously. Being anti-racist does not mean you have to have a sense of humour by-pass operation.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Yes Angela, I did bristle, as most would when the charge of racism is in the air. But you say that you were not making that charge toward me and I accept that. We have different views about the article, which is neither here nor there. Christopher Buckley has written a spoof of the proposed al Qaeda news service, it contains not a racist syllable. (Frankly, I think Barbara Streisand has more reason than anyone to be upset.) I'll skip the musings about racism - "treating an equal as an inferior" is a good start - but I don't think that making fun of a news service run by bloodthirsty nihilist nutters comes close.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
So you find nothing racist in the humour? And bristle that I did find it racist? Well let's have a little looksie:
"And, from Guantánamo today, still another report that Muslim prisoners there are being subjected to barbaric tortures. The report, due out tomorrow from Martyrs Without Borders, the respected humanitarian agency, says these include being made to listen to 'Purimspiel' klezmer music twenty-four hours a day and being forced to watch the Barbra Streisand movie 'Yentl' while immersed up to the neck in chicken soup. Several prisoners have reportedly beheaded themselves rather than endure more of these unspeakable horrors."
Yes, in fact the entire happy jokey article I did read and found it was a horrible snide smash at those islamic people at the other end of the US gunmuzzles.
Is this about Al qaida or the blending of such with the military actions? If we were talking of a dominant or occupying force then ridicule of such is bravery and flamboyance, but we are pouring it on from the perspective of we the occupiers amid superior military force pouring further humiliating scorn upon them. A touch of grinding the nose in.
Why add Palestinians to the picture? Was it to associate with the "terrorists" or lump all the enemies together for one big laugh hohoho.
It must be great to laugh without conscience. Some can do it. Knowing now about Ali G and the caricature of a stupid vulgar sexist man identified as Arab, I can no longer find him funny, just nasty. Again that is my opinion. He is very witty and clever certainly. What if a local Moslem Lebanese actor did a Jewish caricature and was witty and clever but portrayed with very negative atributes, would that still be OK? Or would it be nasty?
When he tried to do a Khazakastan man with the same brush the embassy representative protested. The fact that Mr Cohen has his masters degree in studying how such media portrayals may effect the US wider community's perception of such ethnic/religious groups - in his case of Jewish groups in America in the C20th - shows he knows exactly what his actions may be doing. So why?
Personally I feel uncomfortable about any jokes with labels like those. Like Irish Dave Allen from the 70s. It is like negative Polish jokes and Irish jokes from the past, African American jokes, Aboriginal jokes, Jewish jokes, it is meant to demean the ethnic group and we should be sensitive to that. Cloak of piety or whatever, it is not how I was brought up, and I remember hearing derogatory jokes that at the time I thought were hilarious, but what I have learnt over time as one meets people outside one's "usual group" and starts to understand is how damaging it is, as you said. A good test is to tell it to someone from that group and see if they think it funny you telling it. Risky for friendships.
Anyone can laugh at anything,what one does laugh at with comfort defines one in many ways.
Just a reminder that those in Guantanamo Bay have been interned without trial, many have been found to be completely innocent and returned to their original country, none have yet been found guilty I believe of anything and there has been universal condemnation of the conditions in which they have been kept and the alleged torture they have been recieved, not just in GB but also in other US subcontracted torture areas such in Pakistan and Afghanistan where US military were convicted of torturing to death two men. Blah blah, we all know this yet we find it humourous to laugh at this? How did it start: "And, from Guantánamo today, still another report that Muslim prisoners there are being subjected to barbaric tortures." hohoho.
The writer may find torture amusing and lambasting innocent Islamic people caught up in the power and oil games of a once noble country but I personally find it racist for chosing a person's race/religion to be the target of spiteful humour and insensitive to the very serious and proven allegations of widespread torture by the US against innocent people.
So who is trying to stifle debate with a subtle clever dig here:
"For that reason though, the charge of racism should not be devalued by being thrown around lightly, which can look like moral vanity (mere posturing to cloak yourself in 'holier than thou' virtue)."
I did not say that you were racist by choosing it, but as you have such difficulty in seeing my criticism I wonder how many friends you have who are Moslem, and whether you could perhaps ask whether they feel comfortable by that humourous essay. Just try it I am curious. Perhaps I have been too careful fo people's feelings. If a group are the underdog then I personally feel that is the fairer thing to do at present, to be carefully sensitive.
And Barbara S is one of my favourites as is Singer's classic. Hate chicken soup though.
Seymour Hersch is a reporter that I greatly respect. Criticising a writer from the same magazine makes no impact upon him, nor is it meant to. After all, Paul Mcgeogh comes from the same newspaper that allows SI's director a column. Barf. It is no criticism of you either, in fact it is good to debate what is racism and whether humour has no limit or can be insensitive and derogatory. Was this portrayal derogatory? Of "Alqaida" or of the victims of US warfare also?
So how do you define racism? Perhaps we have different definitions. Personally I understood it to be when an article portrays a group of an ethnic or religious identity in a derogatory way. To humiliate or insult a group. More fierce racism is when such portrayal is to dehumanise to inspire hatred and encourage violence against them or to condone or justify such violence. If it is just against "Alqaida" why does it say "Muslim prisoners" of Guantanamo Bay and talk of Palestinians? "In Ramallah today, a joyous celebration as hundreds of youths urinated on American flags, set tires on fire, and hurled rocks at a passing Icelandic diplomat in honor of Grandmother’s Day." Derogatory? An oppressed occupied people?
In fact, the article talks of all the war scenarios where the US force have been active against people recently, for very dubious reasons, and with excessive force, mocking the people who have suffered much. This is typical of war tactics used, to mock those who are the enemy lest one should stop and think of their suffering.
I call a spade a spade as I see it. It is warmongering racist tripe in my opinion. It is neocon "war on terror" spin. To degrade and dehumanise the peceived enemy and to withold empathy for the suffering of those interned, tortured, bombed and napalmed by our countries.
I call to your better selected article that I also read: "Hugh MacKay considers the various ways humans respond to terrorism and warns against trying to distance ourselves from terrorists by promoting the idea that they are fanatical beyond understanding."
Stop bristling, btw you were never personally in my crosshairs - surely you don't only link that which you agree with? Take a shower, have a surf, and if we still differ in opinion then so be it. The sun will still rise tomorrow and the US will still be bombing Iraq and Moslems here will still be feeling targeted by legislation and know that more from the ME are not wanted here by the latest survey. And we can both wear a cloak if you wish, it bothers me not.
Enjoy Ali G, I prefer Black Adder or Monty Python.
Cheers and keep up the good work.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Angela we do not have to make fun of Fox News. It does it for itself.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Were we making fun of Fox news?
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Wayne Sanderson: "...a news service run by bloodthisty nihilist nutters...".
Are you referring to Stokes, or Packer in particular; "infotainment", or the Worst of the Murdoch Press, or maybe just our shock-jock animals?
Monday Night; Media Watch (who will watch these bastards if the Federal government DOES succeed in ruining channel Two?).
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
BTW did a google on Chris Buckley, facinating background, not the usual "journo makes good " but "good makes journo", showing not all oil barons marry bimbos and have dumbass kids. Don't they get a marital warning label:-be warned, intelligence is now known to be mainly on the x chromosome. End of a dynasty yet again, happens so often. Very nice and affable but dumb as dishwater.
Not in Mr Chris Buckley's case, very bright witty writer, head of a media at 23yrs and yale grad. Who is his mum? Hard to find anywhere, but I bet a smart chook.
His Dad, geee what household would you think would bring up a guy who writes such satire and a book "Florence of Arabia", more anti stererotype Arab satire?
Surprisingly Daddy seemed to be Daddy Bush's speech writer in the 80s, another Yale grad and allegedly a CIA. Why do I think Skull and Bones? Who would ever know and who cares? (we all have our secret societies don't we? Don't you? bad luck.) He likes lampooning those who do too. Certainly one of the elite and in oil, a dye in the wool republican convservative.
Puts the pro-war satire comments in perspective as compared to the mainly critical comments coming out of the US at present, both in satire and straight talk.
Always enlightening to look at the background of those making big noises in the media with big bucks behind them.
cheers
ps come on, Fox may not be anygood as a news source but it is entertaining watching them pretend to be,infotainment without the info. That and Gerard are the two best sources of what is the fashion in spin this week from the murdoch stable. He and his wife are very professional at it ,they deserve that credit, and I enjoy predicting his line each Friday depending upon what is going down..
If it weren't for the death and destruction from their power games this could all be just a lot of fun.
Have journalists always seen these games amongst the elite and re-worded them for more palatable reporting to the masses or is this new?
cheers fellow plebs.
re: The Daily Briefing 7/10/05
Hi Andy Graham, you know on the day that the radio announced that long awaited and much deserved (drank the stuff himself, a al Jenner, yerrrrk) Nobel prize an amazing coincidence occured in the household I was in. We put on a blank tape, expecting it to be Bananas in Pajamas and it was Qantum, from 1995, a show they did about this very topic, the studies done and how the drug companies were allegedly involved in blocking the information to doctors as they feared for their enormous priofits in ulcer care, indeed it would have: daily medication for ever replaced by a two week course and cure.
As persistent ulceration is involved in malignancy, stomach cancer, if this is true, and the action of companies did block acceptance of the new therapy regime, then what an injustice at the same level as the Cox inhibitor scandal! There must be a huge civil case out there for the legal eagles looking for something to replace medical litigation. Go rotties get the bastards. And our FTA negotiator went to join one of their boards.
What an amazing coincidence eh? Never did find bananas but TinTin was there.