Webdiary - Founded and Inspired by Margo Kingston

Margo –

Wow, great to find you again! I was shell-shocked for a couple of days after the very brief and unhelpful send-off from SMH. The withdrawal symptoms persisted for another week. I was just starting to get used to the idea that Webdiary had capitulated to the forces of darkness when I heard you on ABC radio this morning and your new site was mentioned. And here you are. Wonderful.

Good luck Margo, I look forward to reading and contributing. I don’t have too many illusions about Webdiary’s ability to change the world (although there were moments when we really mattered - ref Georgiou's refugee revolt) but I’m not aware of any other forum that takes such a constructive approach to the issues and welcomes such a diverse range of views. Today’s Australia would seem a much darker place without it.

Welcome back.

Margo: David, you've transformed my mood. Thank you.

Hi Margo
It took me quite some searching to find you and resorted to the transcript of Radio National's Media Report. I hope others are as determined.

ed Kerri: On behalf of Margo I am glad you found us, Lorraine. And thanks for posting. As per Webdiary discussion guidelines we request that posters use a surname when posting. Please contact us if you would like to arrange a pseudonym. Thanks.

Thanks for the book, Not Happy John. What an eye opener. Been using some of the info when addressing union members at meetings about the nature of the beast we face.

Thanks for the web diary, and for having the courage to stand up for our democracy. It’s precious, the fabric our society rests on, and yet most people don’t give it another thought – or won't until it is too late.
Best wishes Leith Maddock WA

This morning listening to Latham spit fire on ABC I said to my partner that I would have a look at SMH Webdiary, to get a more thoughtful alternative view of what's going on because to a casual politic-observer like myself, the whole Latham fiasco seemed like -well- a circus. Hard to make out the villains from the good guys because they're all wearing the same cloths.

Imagine my shock when I looked for you on SMH :( Imagine my joy when I quickly discovered your independent site :) But how inconsiderate of you; now I have to make 2 more mouse clicks to catch up on the news ;)

Bon Courage Margo; you're a real 21st Century pioneer explorer and a real Ozzie battler.

Margo, notice the words "preventive detention" in this article. The story is chilling and a worry in "Howard's" Australia.

Hope is Fading
Haiti's Children's Prison
By JUDITH SCHERR
Port-au-Prince.
[Extract only]

Rays of Haiti's scorching noontime sun slip between the bars into the otherwise dark 8 by 10 foot cell, illuminating the sets of eyes that stare out at the visitors.

My eyes adjust and the forms of children emerge. I count 16 boys. Most squeeze seated together on the upper and lower levels of the three bunk beds that fit into a tight "U." A few sprawl behind the seated ones or sit in the tight space on the concrete floor that separates the beds. Three more cells, each with 16 boys, adjoin this one. The youngest of the 64 children is 10 ­ there are at least three 10-year-olds. The oldest is 17. Many have lived in these cells for more than a year.

...

One guard tells me many of the children were jailed as "preventive detention," [eds emphasis] though the children do not explain their incarceration in that way. A number say they were picked up in police "operations," which are sweeps of poorest districts, during which police and/or United Nations soldiers cast a wide net, looking for individuals who may be "bandits" or "chimères," often code words for Aristide supporters.

...

I ask some of the children what they wish for. Many say education. "I'd like some training," says Edwin. "Something to help me be useful for my country."

Others express hopelessness. "I need prayers," says Claude, jailed since July 11. "I don't know how long I'll stay here."

Judith Scherr is a freelance writer in Berkeley.

See where the rodent gets his ideas from.

link here
Mike Whitney: 'Drifting towards a Police State'
Contributed by megsdad on Saturday, November 05 @ 08:56:20 EST
This article has been read 2571 times. Mike Whitney

"Those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid the terrorists for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America's enemies and pause to America's friends"
-- Former Attorney General John Ashcroft

Did you know that under the terms of the new Patriot Act prosecutors will be able to seek the death penalty in cases where "defendants gave financial support to umbrella organizations without realizing that some of its adherents might eventually commit violence"? (NY Times; editorial 10-30-05) So, if someone unknowingly gave money to a charity that was connected to a terrorist group, he could be executed.

Or, that the Senate Intelligence Committee is fine-tuning the details of a bill that will allow the FBI to secretly procure any of your personal records without "probable cause" or a court order giving them "unchecked authority to pry into personal and business matters"? (New York Times, "Republicans seek to widen FBI Powers, 10-19-05)

Or, that on June 29, President Bush put "a broad swath of the FBI" under his direct control by creating the National Security Service (aka; the "New SS")? This is the first time we've had a "secret police" in our 200 year history. It will be run exclusively by the president and beyond the range of congressional oversight.

Or, that on October 27, 2005 president Bush created the National Clandestine Service, which will be headed by CIA Director Porter Goss and will "expand reporting of information and intelligence value from state, local and tribal law enforcement entities and private sector stakeholders"? This executive order gives the CIA the power to carry out covert operations, spying, propaganda, and "dirty tricks" within the United States and on the American public. ("The New National Intelligence Strategy of the US" by Larry Chin, Global Research)

Or, that Pentagon intelligence operatives are now permitted to collect information from US citizens without revealing their status as government spies? ("Bill would give Cover to Pentagon Spies", Greg Miller, Times Staff writer, "The Nation")

Or, that within 2 years every American license and passport will be made according to federal uniform standards including microchips (with biometric information) that will allow the government to trace every movement of its citizens?

Or, that recent rulings, the DC District Court unanimously decided in two different cases that foreign prisoners have no rights under international law to challenge their indefinite imprisonment by the United States and, (in Rumsfeld vs. Padilla) that the president can lock up an American citizen "without charges" if he believes he may be an "enemy combatant"? Both verdicts overturn the fundamental principles of "inalienable rights", habeas corpus, and the presumption of innocence; replacing them with the arbitrary authority of the executive.

The American people have no idea of the amount of energy that has been devoted to stripping them of their constitutional protections and how stealthily that plan has been carried out. It has required the concerted efforts of the political establishment, the corporate elite, and the collaborative media. For all practical purposes, the government is no longer constrained in its conduct towards its citizens; it can do as it pleases.

The campaign to dismantle the Bill of Rights has focused primarily on the key amendments; the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th. These are the cornerstones of American liberty and they encompass everything from due process to equal protection to free speech to a ban on the "cruel and unusual" treatment of prisoners. Freedom has little tangible meaning apart from the safety provided by these amendments.

At present, there's no reason for the administration to assert its new powers. That would only dispel the widely-held illusion of personal freedom. But, the existing climate of "well being" will not last forever. The poisonous effects of war, tax cuts, burgeoning budget deficits, and inflation indicate that darker days lie ahead. The middle class is stretched paper-thin and disaster could be as close as a hike in interest rates. The new repressive legislation anticipates the massive political unrest that naturally follows a tenuous and volatile economic situation.

Is this why Congress has rubber stamped so many of the administration's autocratic laws, or does Bush simply "hate our freedoms"?

The members of America's ruling elite carefully follow the shifting of policy in Washington. They have the power to access the mainstream media and dispute the changes in the law that they oppose. Regrettably, there's been no sign of protest from the bastions of the corporate, financial and political oligarchy; just an ominous silence.

Does this mean that American Brahmins have abandoned their support for personal liberty and the rights of man?

America is undergoing its greatest metamorphosis. It has been severed from its constitutional moorings and is drifting towards a police state. If Samuel Alito is appointed to the Supreme Court then Bush will be able to solidify his "unchecked" power as executive and 50 years of progressive legislation will be up for review. Everything from abortion to Miranda will be reconsidered through the hard-right lens of the new majority.

Americans still seem blissfully unaware of the fundamental changes to the political system. The cloak of disinformation and diversion has successfully obscured the perils of our present course. Freedom is no longer guaranteed in Bush's America nor is liberty everyman's birthright. The rickety scaffolding that supports the rule of law has been replaced by the unbridled authority of the supreme presidency. The country is slipping inexorably towards the Orwellian nightmare; the National Security State.

G'day. Last night I removed Harry Heidelberg's opening statement from the independent Webdiary after suffering in silence a long period of personal abuse, defamatory and baseless allegations and multiple breaches of trust since he resigned as Webdiary's CEO and started his own blog. Mr Heidelberg's abuse of trust reached a sickening level yesterday and I felt it was time that I made it clear that Webdiary is no longer associated with him in any way. This matter is extremely painful for me personally as I had considered Mr Heidelberg a personal friend after working with him ever since I started Webdiary in 2000. I don't want to say anything more about this matter. I've got work to do!