| Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Violence and murder in Indonesia's cash cowJohn Pratt wrote last week:
It is indeed. I have never quite overcome my surprise that Indonesia, after Sukarno’s twelve year long rhetorical barrage about his country’s holy duty to liberate the Papuan brethren from their colonial yoke, started after that alleged liberation almost right away with a regime of terror that has lasted until this day. Quite a few years ago I wrote a series in Webdiary about the history of the conflict that ultimately led to our Northern neighbour’s occupation of Papua. Though I saw at first hand the unsavoury beginnings of its regime I did not foresee that this would soon lead to the genocidal practices that have been so inadequately reported in this country. There have been various estimates of the number of victims. The French quality paper Le Monde Diplomatique reported in February 2010 that the last ‘official figures’ about this dated from 1983. These indicated that between 1963 and 1983 150,000 Papuans had been killed (this on a population of then about one million). The main Dutch expert, Dr Kees Lagerberg, spoke in 2005 of a demographic gap of about 150,000 people, of whom he conservatively estimated that about 30,000 had been killed outright. The rest died as a result of gross neglect and starvation. Solid reports about the region are scarce. The Human Rights Watch report for Indonesia over 2011 stated: “In 2010 Indonesia maintained restrictions on access to Papua by foreign human rights monitors and journalists, facilitating a climate of impunity. Indonesia expelled the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) from Papua in 2009; its office there remained closed in 2010” One of the very scarce reports on what is going on in prisons in Papua came earlier from Oswald Iten, a journalist with the Swiss quality paper Neue Zuercher Zeitung, who was imprisoned in Jayapura for twelve days in December 2000. He had allegedly violated the conditions related to his tourist visa (he had been making photographs and since he was a journalist that counted as working without a work permit). I can’t recall that that report got much attention in this country. Here is a very much shortened version of it: Prison, Torture and Murder in Jayapura When the door to the cell slammed shut behind me, the first thing I noticed was the stench of urine and other human excreta. Then I saw, through the dim, humidly hot air, bodies lying on the filthy concrete floor, packed one next to the other like sardines. It was one o'clock in the morning. Someone in the lineup of bodies handed me a cardboard box, so that I'd at least have something clean to lay my head on. The police had taken me into custody the previous day and grilled me for nine hours, because on 1 December I had taken "political photos" ostensibly not permitted by my tourist visa. … So there I was, in a cell with about 40 other prisoners. Among them were 26 members of the "Satgas Papua," a militia of the independence movement which had established posts throughout Irian Jaya and was responsible for guarding the freedom flag. … The members of the Satgas Papua were physically unharmed. That could not be said of all the prisoners. During my first night in the cell, a drunk was hauled in, and the guards punched and kicked him in the face. Almost every night some drunk was brought in to sober up and, this being the month of Ramadan, was treated to special physical abuse designed to leave him with a lasting souvenir in the form of a missing tooth or a broken nose. At first I tried to get the guards to ease up, but they grew angry and completed their violent work in the guardroom near the entrance to the cells. Dizzy from both alcohol and the beating, the victims were then thrown into our cell and released the following morning. At 4:30 A.M. on Thursday, 7 December, noise from the guardroom penetrated the stuffing I'd put in my ears to help me sleep. At first I thought the guards were doing some rhythmic gymnastics, but it also sounded like blows landing on a body. My fellow prisoners were wide awake, and they tried to hold me back when I went to the entranceway of our cell block. The upper part of the door was merely barred, so I had a view of the guardroom. And what I saw there was unspeakably shocking. About half a dozen policemen were swinging their clubs at bodies that were lying on the floor and, oddly enough, did not cry out; at most, only soft groans issued from them. After a few long seconds, a guard saw me looking and struck his club against the bars of the cell block door. I quickly went back to my usual spot, from where I could still see the clubs, staffs and split bamboo whips at their work. Their ends were smeared with blood, and blood sprayed the walls all the way up to the ceiling. Sometimes I saw the policemen hopping up on benches, continuing to strike blows from there or jumping back down onto the bodies below (which I could not see from my cell). Thousands of blows must have descended on what was to me an unknown number of people. I thought: That's what it means to "thrash" somebody. By about 5:15 A.M. things quieted down and I heard the sound of water from a hose. But then the orgy of torture resumed, apparently with a new load of prisoners. … At 7:30 A.M. the torturers went outside for morning muster, things quieted down and I looked over into the guardroom: the floor was covered with blood, as in a slaughterhouse. Some of my fellow prisoners were ordered out to clean the place up. Shortly before 10 o'clock, noise broke out again. The cell block door was opened, and with the ends of their staffs the guards drove about three dozen new prisoners in, whose hair had been marked with white from a spray can, like sheep earmarked for shearing. The newcomers were jammed into a single cell. Then the cell block door was opened again and one body after another was tossed into our already crowded cell, some of them more dead than alive. Most of them remained motionless where they fell, either unconscious or utterly exhausted. They must have been the men who had been tortured earlier that morning. A mask maker would find it difficult to conjure out of his imagination such horrifically distorted faces and damaged twisted bodies. One of the tortured men was virtually blind and had to be led in by the hand by another prisoner; I couldn't tell whether his eyes had been totally destroyed or were merely swollen shut. The last one to enter was a large man, who fell over the bodies on the floor and lay there groaning horribly. He tried repeatedly to straighten himself up, only to fall back down again. Now and again the faces of guards appeared at the barred window, looking down impassively at the tangle of maltreated bodies. In the back of the big man's head, there appeared to be a coin sized hole through which I believed to spot some brain tissue. After nearly an hour and a half of groaning and spasmodic movement, his suffering visibly neared its end. About two meters from me, his powerful body raised itself again and his head struck the wall. A final labored breath issued from him, then his head dropped down onto the cement floor. At last his agony was over. After a while, three lackeys came and dragged the body out. Later I learned that the man who had been tortured to death was named Ori Dronggi. … Ori Dronggi was one of 18 men from the highland town of Wamena, all of whom had been arrested in a dormitory near the university in Abepura immediately following the attack on the police post. The chances are he had had nothing to do with the attack; the same was true of the 35 other men who had been tortured (I had counted them the following day). … In the night following the orgy of torture, the guards felt that I should no longer sleep in the cell with the other prisoners, whose number had by now swelled to 124 and many of whom were covered with suppurating wounds. … The next morning, Police Chief Daud Sihombing, who also served as superintendant of the prison, noticed that I had not slept in the cell. Furious, he ordered the guards to bring me back there. He also confiscated the mosquito net one guard had brought me. I asked Sihombing if he wanted me to contract malaria. In a voice brooking no contradiction, he replied: "You're no different from the other prisoners. If they get malaria, so will you." … The mistreatment of other prisoners continued. On 11 December I again witnessed a horrible scene. About 2:45 A.M., three new prisoners were brought in. Two of them were badly beaten outside my field of vision. The third Papuan fell right in front of the one-man cell to which Chief Sihombing had exiled me. A booted guard kicked the man in the head; the prisoner's head banged loudly against my cell door, blood spurting from it onto my leg. The guard was apparently fascinated by the head going back and forth between his boot and the bars of my cell door, like some outsized ping-pong ball, so he kicked it a few more times. A second guard joined in with a swift kick to the middle of the prisoner's face, knocking him unconscious. But that still wasn't enough. A third guard, who had been watching the scene with rifle in hand, now struck the butt of his weapon about five times into the senseless man's skull, which made a horrible sound. I could hardly believe it, but the victim was still alive the next day. He was taken away for interrogation. … The fact that I was not harmed in the prison at Jayapura was due, among other things, to the swift arrival of Norbert Bärlocher, the deputy mission chief of the Swiss embassy in Jakarta. He traveled 3,800 kilometers to the capital of Irian Jaya in order to extend his protection to me until my deportation on 16 December. But several dozen less privileged prisoners remained back in the cell, with the Satgas militiamen still among them. Their life in prison will doubtless continue to be as I experienced it, marked by violence.”
[ category: ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Australia, Heart of Darkness
If there is such a contrast, Indonesian and Pacific Island newspapers reporting such abuses but Australian newspapers involved in a conspiracy of silence, there is something here that needs to be investigated by those willing and able. There is no legitimate reason, there is something culpable to be exposed.
Remember the huge media propaganda campaign screaming for military attacks on Libya, demanding a civil war, Libyans against Libyans, large number of deaths ostensibly to protect the population from death, when it was blindingly obvious that what has happened was going to happen, replacement of a murderous secular dictatorship with an equally murderous religious dictatorship? Why the difference?
Why the media frenzy over something on the other side of the world and the conspiracy of silence over something much worse next door, not Libyans against Libyans but foreign conquerers against Papuans?
I could go on and show why this makes it imperative for Iran to have nuclear weapons, that those who want to impose sanctions and wage war on Iran, and their lackey countries like Australia are the bad guys, and those such as Russia and China, both in the past victims of attack by the bad guys, in China's case to force them to import opium, are the good guys.
Yeah, sorry to change the subject. But I will. Not West Irian, but two other countries which the bad guys, us, have turned into hell, and in the case of Iran which the bad guys, us, are preparing to make war on because they threw off a century of subjection to the same bad guys, us, the same bad guys now being selectively supported to do so by the same bad guy media that others in this thread have exposed.
Why do we have a problem with Afghanistan? Where did it come from? To start with, Britain in the 19th Century, same time as the Opium Wars, tried to conquer Afghanistan, for 1500 years part of Persia, and when they couldn't they assisted a fierce minority, the Pashtuns, to cause Afghanistan to be separated from Persia, though largely Persian speaking, and become a Pashtun empire.
"Tajik" is Turkic for Persia. "Tajikistan" means, literally, Persia. The secular part of Persia, thanks to the good guys. So Afghanistan is a part of Persia in the middle of Persia. When it separated, Tajikistan was cut off.
A century later a secular democratic government of Afghanistan supported and encouraged by the USSR emerged. Then the bad guys, the Americans, cultivated an army of religious fanatics and assisted and armed them so the secular government was destroyed. Then the USA immediately abandoned what was left, left the country an anarchic hell that the Taliban eventually brought order to.
As to Iran, the second and third last shahs were overthrown by coups d'etat organised and supported by the British, then the British and Americans jointly conspired to overthrow the democratic secular government of Iran and a conspiracy by their top man in the area, Kermit Roosevelt, terminated Mossadeq's prime-ministership and turned the last shah into an autocrat. He, that shah, was wanted in place of his father, whom the British had installed, bacause his father, Reza, was too smart and independent-minded, and the son, the last shah, Mohammed Reza, was a dimwit easily controlled by the British and the Americans.
That control was not, of course, intended to benefit Iran, it was imperialism for the benefit of the bad guys, and probably 90% of the population supported the uprising that removed the Shah, the outcome of which left Ayatollah Khomeini in charge. Khomeini was in exile before the revolution but was heard daily addressing his countrymen on the BBC, which due to British intimidation the Shah did not attempt to block. In other words, we, the bad guys, are quite proximately responsible for the present hell, the reign of the mollahs.
Then there was the US Embassy hostage affair again supported by the whole population which for the best of good reasons had learnt to hate the bad guys, and then the Iran-Contra affair whose purpose was to arm the Nicaraguan Contras to defeat a popular Sandanista uprising that overthrew the dictatorship of Somoza, a Central American Gaddafi supported by the USA.
Notice along the way that Iran has about the same population as France or Germany but the area of both countries combined, and that most of its land border is with nuclear-armed states, Turkey, Russia and Pakistan (the first armed by the USA) and Turkey and Russia in the past have attacked Persia and grabbed large chunks of that country.
Is it surprising that virtually the entire Iranian population support Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons? The bad guys, us, have made it essential for Iran to be nuclear armed, but the bad guys, us, are, totally true to form, now talking sanctions and military attacks to keep Iran subservient or destroyed. Thank God for the good guys, Russia and China.
And to change the subject yet again, anyone who thinks about it will see that Iranian threats and rants against Israel are for local consumption, aimed at their own population. If they really intended to attack Israel they would be silent about it.
Now look back at the silence of the Australian imperialist media (imperialism, in other words, capitalism, is the name of the evils I have been narrating) on West Papua. There is something truly evil here, too consistent.
(Thanks, Paul Walter, for my title. You too, Joe Conrad.)
Self-Determination
Another point to be borne in mind in connection with the Indonesian occupation of West Papua and flooding it with Javanese. If "West Irians" ever have another vote on the question of being part of Indonesia, the majority will vote to, and it will be passed off as self-determination and make it legitimate that the Papuan minority will never have independence.
In other words the Indonesian government is acting and will act in a very British manner, doing what the lackey state Australia would support because it is what the bad guys do.
I used to sentimentally support continued British sovereignty of the Falkland Islands. It didn't seem to me that Argentina had a case when the islands have English-speaking inhabitants of British descent. Obviously they had a right of self-determination and they had decided to stay British. End of story. Argentinian claims ipso facto totally illegitimate.
Then I noticed a chapter on the Falklands in Charles Darwin's Journal of Researches. It had been written after the British takeover but not, apparently, long after.
Darwin touched on the preceding Argentinian administration and it appears that there had genuinely been such a thing, with Argentinian regulation of land tenure.
And he described the flood of Englishmen who had poured in, the worst possible, piratical types, real murderous scum.
So Britain had done just what Indonesia is doing in West Papua, but with even less legimacy. In a very Israeli manner that had simply grabbed sometone else's property, part of Argentina, by pure force, established "settlements", the British population soon overwhelming the Argentinians or driving them out, and so, therefore, the Falklands became "legitimately" British by self-determination.
Typical bad guy stuff.
Hmm, whaddya know?
It's a beaut potted history this, from Michael Talbot.
Seems wherever we go we end up digging up the bones of those left previously, forgot about, then stumbled aross at a later date, until the forensic revealed the truth.
Groundhog day.
Cops will be cops
Yes, once-again-Australia-is-relatively silent about violence on its doorstep, but shouldn't we better attend to the beam in our own eye?.
- Consider just one incident at Haditha, in a country we chose to invade for no particular reason. A car bomb kills a soldier, the troops go on a rampage, entering nearby homes to murder women and children. Quite similar to Ori Dronggi's sad story. And the slow grinding of justice - no jail for one scapegoat scapegoat Sargent. .
- Or Aboriginal deaths in custody, the latest public outcry of which was in Palm Island
- Or police abuse with TASERs, in 'civilised' countries such as Australia and Canada....
But most of all, we need Indonesia for our boat people problem...Heart of Darkness.
Like most things to do with the region, studiously unreported back here.
ABC, etc are supposed to be "without fear or favour", but this looks another reason for contemplation of the dumbing accusations against Australian Media.
The only mainstream politician of note who has ever drawn attention to the the shadowy goings on to Australia's north was Kevin Rudd, when opposition leader, concerning West Papuan boat asylum seekers about five years ago.
Apart from that stories about thuggery and bloodshed in regions around big mines controlled by offshore TNC's and the general swamping of the country by Javanese settlers, at the expense of the locals, emanate in through the aether, but never loudly enough to disturb the general Australian coma.