Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

Project Iron Boomerang

Project Iron Boomerang
by John Pratt

In a time of economic downturn when the private sector is reducing its work force, the national government should step up to the plate with infrastructure spending to stimulate the economy and create jobs for the unemployed. We should be building infrastructure to benefit Australia when the boom times return.

One such project is the Iron Boomerang – the vision more than thirty years ago of iron ore magnate Lang Hancock of an east-west railway line to transport Queensland coal to Western Australia’s Pilbara region, returning to Queensland with Pilbara iron ore:

To establish first stage iron and steel smelting parks

  • near Newman Fortescue River Valley in Western Australia (WA) and at Abbot Point Precinct in Queensland (QLD) (near Bowen, N-Qld).
  • linked by a new heavy gauge railway line
    • over 3,300 kilometres
    • West to East
    • from Port Hedland (spur to Dampier) in WA to Abbot Point in QLD
    • linking Australia's export iron ore - coking/thermal coal mines
  • will also utilise both the sustainable and abundant natural gases available
    • coal seam methane gas in Queensland
    • natural gas in Western Australia

Steel smelting would be established both in the Pilbara and in the Bowen Basin. Australia would then be exporting steel rather than iron ore and coal. Other industries which depend on steel and energy could also be developed in these new industrial regions. Steel could also be smelted midway in the Northern Territory.

One man with the money and the vision to bring the project to life is Shane Condon:

A HUGE project spanning a continent, three states, and at least five other countries will send Mackay's Boom Two into overdrive with 8000 new jobs for the region.

Project Iron Boomerang (PIB) will be a 3300km railway line from near the Pilbara, in Western Australia, to the Abbot Point region, north of Mackay, transporting iron ore and coal back and forth.

Korea, Taiwan, China, India and Japan are also interested in the project, which would offer cheaper steel to the industrial powerhouses.

Instead of Western Australia exporting raw iron ore and Queensland's Bowen Basin exporting raw coking coal, the line would shuttle both each way, allowing processed steel slabs to be exported from both sides of the continent.

The steel would weigh about one-third of the used raw materials, dropping the price of shipping.

With the proper government approvals, PIB will be operational by 2014 and fully completed by 2016.

Shane Condon, who founded the East West Line Parks company, which is behind the project, said six blast furnaces at each end of the line would process raw materials.

"It's one of the world's biggest projects," Mr Condon said.

"The plan is very solid and sound.

"We're just where we want to be 19 of the world's biggest steel companies have signed on to the project."

Mr Condon said it would cost $12.4billion to build the railway, for rolling stock (locomotives and wagons) and the land for the industrial parks at each end.

The total cost of the project, including infrastructure at each end, would be more than $49billion.

This would make it one of the biggest commercial projects in the world.

"There'll be 8000 jobs in the region, permanently," he said.

Instead of wasting billions of dollars on stimulus packages the government should be investing in infrastructure projects that will create the jobs of the future. We should always be adding value to our resources. Australia needs to be more than a quarry. By producing steel in Australia we can make sure the world’s best environmental practice is applied. Who knows – if carbon capture and storage becomes a reality we may even be able to dramatically reduce the inevitable GHG emissions. It is high time to move the industrial heart of Australia to the north.

left
right
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Inconsistent?

John, I share your concerns about the lack of infrastructure spending in Australia. Indeed, my greatest concern about the current range of stimulus packages is how much is really being spent on infrastructure. If you knock out catch up maintenance progroams (which should have been done anyway) there isnt really all that much that will show for the mountain of debt that has been built.

That aside, on the various climate change threads over the last few months, you have often called coal "black death" or used similar names. Also talked lots about building a new economy.

None of this talk really seems to sit anywhere remotely close to the theme of this thread - indeed you seem to be advocating trains of "black death" traversing the country to generate enormous amounts of green house gases to export more steel.

Care to explain that a little?

The best use of black death

Craig, I understand your concern about the use of coal. What I would like to see is an electrified rail across the continent  powered by solar or geothermal power. I think we will have to use steel to move into alternative energies and bring about the new economy (solar arrays and windmills use a lot of steel). It is hard to see a world where we can do without steel. By using our coal to produce steel in Australia we can reduce the inefficiencies of empty trains and empty bulk containers ships returning to the mine sites. The trains would always be full with coal or iron ore. The ships exporting steel would return with cars or other manufactured products. Every time we ship coal or iron an awful lot of the product is waste.

By producing the steel in Australia we could make sure the world's best environmental practices are used.

I believe by the efficient use of our coal we could dramatically reduce the GHG effects of steel manufacturing.

Have you any ideas how we may replace steel and have no GHG emissions?

Coal is black death and will be used for some time. We should make sure we make the best use of the product and not cause needless GHG emissions.

Investment

Sounds like a good idea, but the costing is crucial and the need for capital may kill it especially, as you say, if the Federals spend too much.

I find that I have little confidence in the Feds as they have not been straight with us, given the likely depth of the depression. They obviously do not wish to cause despair, but they should be confident enough to inform us of their projections. Perhaps they are stuck with obamavision? The US dog and Aussie tail? 

There are other big projects, but we should support those that have maximum local input.

This seems ideal as a counter cyclical to the mines laying off staff. Wages will be cheaper soon and the need for the project should be explored more publicly. I hope they will lay optic fibre and a pipeline as well. The pipes might be for gas or water. Fluidised coal can also be piped and the use of a train may not be necessary if the iron ore can be fluidised also. I don't know the technicalities. The biggest need will be for way leaves, based on the flattest straightest track. When the USA did this in the 19th Century there was wholesale graft but they also set up new towns as local industries could expand with the cheaper railway transport. The interior of Australia is not presently like the US prairies, but we may find more minerals and better agricultural opportunities witht the railway. 

Iron boomerang? OK!

Here is a blue sky idea. Given the corridor established by the Iron boomer, we may wish to explore the use of ground effect aircraft which the Russians, mainly, developed. By flying 100 feet or less off the ground, the remotely controlled Aussie version will find a carpet under the peculiar wings structures which will cut the need for altitude and fuel. Normally they are only considered for use over water, but if the route permitted, fast freight and passenger traffic would be possible if the route were straight enough. Speed is 2-300 knots per hour far less than French rail speeds, airraft could be built locally. Depends on the width of the wayleaves as their height means no development in their designated corridor.

The US wayleaves were roughly 20 miles, 30k wide. This strip would afford rights to exploit in conjunction with the rail. The USA may be trying something similar North South in the states soon. They want to link Canada with Mexico. 

The need for water is obvious, so a canal would be a great option due to the amounts of water available in the wet, and from northern rivers. 

And a lucky bag!

To those who say we do not have the population, I say we will find the population if we build the infrastructure. I think it will be 50 years before it is built, but get it surveyed asap.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2005-2011, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Recent Comments

David Roffey: {whimper} in Not with a bang ... 12 weeks 6 days ago
Jenny Hume: So long mate in Not with a bang ... 12 weeks 6 days ago
Fiona Reynolds: Reds (under beds?) in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Justin Obodie: Why not, with a bang? in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Fiona Reynolds: Dear Albatross in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Michael Talbot-Wilson: Good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 1 day ago
Fiona Reynolds: Goodnight and good luck in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 3 days ago
Margo Kingston: bye, babe in Not with a bang ... 13 weeks 6 days ago