Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

Bye Bye Lexie...

In a strange way I will miss Alexander Downer. Nobody does pomposity or hissy fits better than him. Besides, he does (or did) have rather nice legs …

Bernard Keane, in today’s Crikey, writes:

That Downer was our worst foreign minister of recent decades goes without saying. Possibly he was our worst ever, but that’s a matter for foreign policy PhDs.

What’s more important is that he chucked in the job in the early part of this decade. From 2001 to 2007, Australia’s foreign policy was essentially outsourced to the United States – and not to the US State Department, where some good sense has remained under Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, but to the White House.

Under Howard and Downer, we swapped an alliance and friendship based on shared culture and interests, within which there was room for disagreement and debate, for reflexive support for whatever issued from the mouth of George W. Bush or his operator, Dick Cheney. In doing so, Downer and Howard inflicted significant damage on Australians’ perception of our relationship with the US which, had Mark Latham fluked his way to an election victory in 2004, might have been made long-term. It is testimony to the strength of the US-Australia relationship that it looks to have survived the relationship between the Howard Government and Bush Administration reasonably intact.

In abandoning our foreign policy independence, Downer was guilty of two great evils, along with his Prime Minister and his Cabinet colleagues: leading Australia into an illegal, immoral attack on Iraq that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqis, if not more, and ruthlessly exploiting the – in historical terms – relatively minor threat of Islamic terrorism for crass political purposes.

Compared to those, other Downer f-ck-ups like our damaged relationship with PNG are fairly minor.

There were a lot of things about Downer not to like – but many of them he couldn’t do anything about. It wasn’t his fault that he looked and sounded like the British public school prig from Central Casting, and in some ways it was amusing that Australia was represented for so long by Boy Mulcaster. And the poor bastard never lived down the innocuous business with the Rocky Horror Show stockings.

But he was more like his predecessor Gareth Evans than either would wish to admit – long-serving foreign ministers, both with grotesquely over-inflated conceptions of their world influence, both somehow encapsulating the very worst of their parties and therefore, automatically, capable of inspiring loathing in opponents. But let’s be charitable – if nothing else can unite the divided citizens of Cyprus, maybe five minutes with Alex will do the trick.

In the end, AWB summed up Downer’s foreign ministership perfectly: the deliberate turning of a blind eye to the bribery by a National Party scam of a tyrant against whom Downer was at that very moment making the case for war, about whose toppling Downer would later boast – and against whose forces we would shortly send our troops. The wilful failure of accountability and the intellectual dishonesty of Downer’s response upon discovery – along with that of Howard and Mark Vaile – turned even the Howard Government cheerleaders at The Australian against him.

I laughed till I cried over Keane’s prognostications for Cyprus. In any event, his piece serves as a nice contrast to Janet Albrechtsen’s fulsome accolade in the Oz earlier this week:

Alexander Downer, our longest serving foreign minister, will announce his retirement from politics this week. When he departs, the Liberal Party will lose one of this country’s staunchest defenders of individual liberty and conservatism. Sure, the Left will cheer his departure. Let them. It will be a sign of Downer’s contribution to conservative politics in Australia if his departure is applauded by his critics. 

Downer has always preferred a robust free market of ideas. Start with his maiden speech in February 1985, where he called for national leadership based on a definable set of values, rather than a craving for popularity. And finish with his comments to The Australian at the weekend to mark his departure, where he criticised the current mood that favours symbolism over substance. Downer will go down in history as one of this nation's best advocates of conservative principles.

Not perfect, of course. Some of the policies taken by the Howard Government during Downer's time as foreign minister (namely Iraq) have been attacked by conservatives. Fair enough. But Downer stood ready to defend Australia's involvement in Iraq as the best way to bring freedom to the Iraqis.

Never fazed by his critics, no matter how shrill or persistent – and over Iraq, the critics were both - Downer had that rare quality missing in many politicians. He had a temperament suited to politics, one that fused good humour with straight shooting talk. No hissy fits. No hiding from the media. Keating's remark that Downer was the "idiot son of the aristocracy" revealed much more about the jealousies and class warfare instincts of the former Labor PM than it did about Downer.

Downer may have been born into a prominent Liberal Party family – his father, Sir Alexander Downer was a former Liberal Party cabinet minister - but he developed a passion for politics and ideas that, if we are honest, rarely accompanies a silver spoon. Few were more effective in defending the Liberal Party and Howard Government policy. And for a former diplomat, Downer was refreshingly free of verbose, say-nothing diplomatic-speak.

That’s right, Janet, never let the facts get in the way of a good dollop of revisionist sycophancy.

left
right
[ category: ]
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

He won't do any damage - maybe

"He won't do any damage in his job as the Cyprus negotiator," according to Peter Galbraith. "Because one thing's for sure: if there were any serious chance of making progress between the Greeks and Turks on Cyprus, the UN would not have appointed Downer."

That's from the end of Hamish McDonald's opinion piece Downer diplomacy: if you don't succeed, bully again in today's smh.

Most of the article, though, is about East Timor. Downer's "adroit diplomacy" in precipitating the crisis, and then delaying intervention, and the negotiations over the Timor Gap oil and gas reserves, which is where Galbraith gained his appreciation of Downer's diplomatic skills.

Was the Iraq war considered and planned?

The last dozen years has been a period of intense activity in Australian foreign policy. Some of it has been controversial; some of it has been unpopular; and sometimes the practitioners have had a moment of laughter and personal enjoyment. But always our policies have been considered, planned and founded on the principle of promoting Australia's national interests.

Downer's comments in the SMH today.

Alexander Downer is complaining of media bias - he says all his policies were considered and planned. I notice there is no mention of Iraq. I wonder just how much consideration and planning went into our role in the invasion of Iraq. This is the worst foreign policy decision made in Australia's history and he makes no mention of it.

Downer's role in the AWB wheat scandal while our troops were at war in Iraq made the Foreign Affairs department look like village idiots.

Without doubt, Downer was Australia's worst Minister for Foreign Affairs.

His legacy is a never ending war in Afghanistan. The likelihood of a war breaking out between Pakistan, Iran, India, Iraq, Israel, and the US all threatening to plunge Australia into the centre of it.

If this is what Downer calls planned and considered, give me the reasons that Australia is fighting Afghan peasants who have never be a threat to Australia.

Downer found moments of laughter and personal enjoyment. It a pity that young Australians have been killed and many families have been torn apart, no so much laughter and personal enjoyment there. How many more will be killed and for what? 

Downer's little chickens coming home to roost today

A new commission into the referendum massacre in East Timor shows forthrightly that it was Indonesia.

And which former foreign minister lied to everyone about who was doing this killing in Dili when 1500 people died?

1999 E Timor violence down to 'rogue elements'?

Marilyn, I agree.

There are only two possible explanations for Downer's public position during the 1999 violence in East Timor; ( ie that it was all due to 'rogue elements' in the occupying Indonesian armed forces). One is that he and the senior DFAT officials could not see the truth that was staring them in the face, making them all total fools. The other is that they denied that truth out of diplomatic necessity in their perpetual quest to remain on the best possible terms with the Indoneian military hierarchy and the none-too-separate Indonesian government, making Downer a brazen liar.

Take your pick. (See here, and here and here.)

A little remembered fact is that John Howard quietly agreed that the Australian taxpayer would pick up the bill for the reconstruction of East Timor after the 1999 TNI rampage had destroyed most of its infrastructure. That bill was estimated at the time to come to around $A 1 billion. The actual amount spent has never been highlighted by any government or any opposition.

Personally, I think that international pressure should be brought to bear to force the present TNI (which has its own sources of independent funding, mainly in West Papua) to cough up the lot.

I also believe that Australia has no honourable (or even safe) interest in 'defence cooperation' with the Indonesian military.

Successive Australian governments have attempted to buy the friendship of the powers that run Indonesia. But true friendship is not bought.

Burns re Downer on Downer: To a Louse

Hold the front page.

I have just read Downer on Downer in the SMH. It brings to mind those  immortal lines of Robbie Burns':

"O wad some pow'r the giftie gie us.
To see oursels as ithers see us
It wad frae monie a blunder free us,
An' foolish notion."

(Robert Burns, To a Louse, from Iain MacDonald, Forres)

Frogs' legs in stockings for Bastille Day?

As it's Alex's formal departure day, what could be more appropriate?

I don't know how many lies the man has told, but he appears to have made a habit of it.  The recent suggestions that he was White House stooge (er, liaison?) have rung so true to me.    When you look at the interplay in trying to sell American reactors and Australian uranium to India (my piece Another Alexander Downer Fraud here) it's obvious that Downer thought he was playing the public like a piano, when he wasn't even pedalling the pianola.

Vive La Revolution!

Charming, quite charming...

In today’s Letters to the Ed (SMH):

Another excellent piece by Peter Hartcher ("Vale, Alexander the not-so-great", July 4), but I don't think some of Mr Downer's supporters enjoyed it. Following the article's publication, Mr Hartcher's Wikipedia entry was edited to describe him as "a staunch left-wing journalist … whose supposed 'neutral' stance is nothing more than the farce that is the man himself". Interestingly, the only other Wikipedia edits by the computer user who made the changes were for Alexander Downer's entry, often to clarify personal details and remove (well-founded) criticism.

Sean Gleeson Carlton North (Vic)

Well, Peter Hartcher’s Wiki entry has been amended (again) – but it’s a timely reminder of the reliability of that particular oracle.

Michael de Angelos, I've been trying to track down an incident involving a "late" collection of Mr Downer from the airport of a South American country, which I think led to the recall of our ambassador (or his 2ic). Can you give me any leads here?

That's the trouble with Wikipedia profiles

Fiona: "Hartcher is said by an anonymous amender of his Wikipedia entry to be "a staunch left-wing journalist … whose supposed 'neutral' stance is nothing more than the farce that is the man himself"

The wording has a certain familiar ring to it, reminiscent of the pompous delivery of a certain past politician, but I can't for the life of me say who it could be.

Menzies? No. Hartcher probably wasn't even born in his time.

Whitlam? No. It would have been far better expressed and more vitriolic.

Keating? No. Too far above the gutter.

I give up.

Fishnet Follies

The gall of him! Calling anyone a coward .

But it's what you expect from the pompous prat who (despite the continual moaning about the Gosford couple) was one of the worst at abusing staff at our international embassies and consulates when they didn't accord him due reverence – heaven help a driver who was late to collect his Lordship from an airport abroad. Junior consulate or embassy staff felt the full fury of this nitwit when things weren't up to scratch.

Rather than this bozo accusing anyone of cowardice, he should be apologising for sitting on the backbenches (when he bothered to turn up) and using his taxpayer funded job to seek out another position. There need to be new rules about MPs who seek election and then when finding they don't get the accolades they wish – such as another turn in government – resign. They should have to refund the cost of a new election.

Either that or hey serve out their term.

Alex is the cowardy custard though

Let's see now. Dolly was attempting to beat Keating as leader of the Liberal party until he decided that their policy on domestic violence should be called 'the things that batter". He doesn't "do" cables, so much hard work adjusting the fishnets perhaps.

He still believes the massacres in Iraq were a great thing and too bad about the human beings slaughtered, homeless or destitute. I don't think he knows what an Iraq actually is and thinks it is some kind of exotic guppy.

He didn't have the guts to tell Honest John to rack off because he was destroying the party.

So when the party lose government Dolly lunches a lot, plays golf a lot, wines and whines with Greg Sheridan and Janet A. about being so hard done by.

Takes up a radio spot with the wife on redneck radio, sits on the back bench, starts a business then resigns weeks later.

And he calls Rudd a coward?

Ruddy-duddy is a cowardly-custard

Retiring senior federal Liberal MP Alexander Downer says the Prime Minister would be cowardly if Labor does not contest the by-election in his electorate [Mayo, SA].

But Ruddy-duddy says his party-warty has "got to work these things out, and we'll sort it out in due course." So there!

Hohh! counters Magic Alex. Hohh hohh!

"If Mr Rudd doesn't run a candidate in Mayo, well then he's slinking away in a cowardly way and he should be prepared to face up to the judgement of the people..."

... times infinity! So there, Ruddy-duddy!

Only time will tell if Magic Alex lobs the most nasty, unanswerable insult of them all: "Ruddy-duddy is a just a Big Sissy-wissy...!"

A numbers game

Gough may have lost his memory on one cable. Poor Alexander Downer seems to have had a complete attack of temporary Alzheimers when it came to cables during the AWB investigation.

Or he caught that temporary brainstorm that affected Alan Bond.

They tell me that Nicosia has a thriving drag queen scene. It's going to be fascinating to see how much influence Alex has when his fishnet pics start to appear in the local press.

Eliot, he was cleared

Eliot, which part of Gough was cleared of all knowledge of the Balibo 5 murder don't you get? The coroner said it in black and white so will you stop your pathetic drivel? In fact I have had a gutful of the maundering on about the Balibo 5. 183,000 East Timorese were slaughtered after Kissinger gave the nod to Suharto and Peacock said nothing because it was against the national interest.

The Balibo 5 are just five more people and not more important just because they were journalists.

And, for the record, Howard has always said he knew nothing about SIEVX – even when the evidence proved that his office knew everything there was to know including that it was overcrowded and in danger of sinking.

All cleared up then

 Marilyn Shepherd: "The Balibo 5 are just five more people and not more important just because they were journalists".

So a few people on the SIEVX drowned? No big deal, as they were no more important than the Balibo 5.

Do you feel better now? It's all so simple really.

He missed by that much....

Marilyn Shepherd: "Whitlam was not the PM when Indonesia invaded East Timor. Full stop. Finished."

But he knew it was coming, didn't he?

Dorelle Pinch, the deputy coroner of New South Wales state, quizzed Whitlam about whether he had seen an Australian intelligence cable dated Oct. 13, 1975, indicating an Indonesian military operation was to start in East Timor on Oct. 15 and would include an attack on Balibo town, where the journalists died. Indonesia invaded on October 16.

"I do not recall reading that," Whitlam said.

Imagine if Johnny Howard said that about SIEV-X, Marilyn?

Alan he did not

Whitlam's position was always that the East Timorese had to agree. 

Whitlam was not the PM when Indonesia invaded East Timor.   Full stop.   Finished.

And East Timor is worse off now than ever in it's history with 40% of the population still living on 60 cents a day so what did we actually achieve?

 

Not a lot really except to have a dependent satellite state for decades to come while we are ripping them off for gas and oil in the sea.

You can whine and blame Whitlam as much as you want but he has not been the PM since 11 November 1975 and there was no invasion of East Timor at the time.

As for the Balibo 5, the coroner cleared Whitlam of any knowledge, after all he had just been told that Fraser was blocking supply to bring down the government, hadn't he?

Memory

Marilyn, Whitlam can remember the Dismissal but he suddenly loses his memory when it comes to "that cable" which could have saved the Balibo 5. I'll bet he does not forget he has a Gold Pass when he books a flight to somewhere.  I am sorry, but what Whitlam did makes him a war criminal.

It was all in his stars...

The following should be read in conjunction with Peter Hartcher’s fascinating analysis:

Alexander DOWNER: astrology and birth chart

Alexander DOWNER, the predominance of planets in the Northern hemisphere prompts you to reflect and imagine rather than to exteriorize your actions and to be at the forefront of the stage. So, should you wish to remedy this situation, it is up to you to force your nature to take action in broad daylight, to communicate and to assert yourself... then, you can move forward in this concrete life and enjoy your newly won situation.

The predominance of planets in the Western hemisphere of your chart means that you are quite flexible, empathetic, convivial and communicative. An excellent factor for many professional activities or for your social or sentimental life for example.

A definite asset... provided that you are not at the centre of the decisions you must take in your life : you may be tempted to listen to the last person who spoke and your flexibility won't always get you out of the tight spot. You are therefore advised to learn to decide alone and to cope with the consequences of your actions with courage and no regrets. This attitude will allow you to combine flexibility and action, adaptability and absence of hesitation.

Alexander DOWNER, the nocturnal North-western quadrant, consisting of the 4th, 5th and 6th houses, prevails in your chart : this sector favours creativity, conception and some sort of specialization or training, with helpfulness and relations as strong components. You need others' cooperation in order to work properly, although you are not very expansive : creating, innovating and thinking are what matter most to you because this self-expression enriches you and totally satisfies you.

Like the majority of Earth signs, Alexander DOWNER, you are efficient, concrete and not too emotional. What matters to you is what you see: you judge the tree by its fruits. Your ideas keep changing, words disappear, but actions and their consequences are visible and remain. Express your sensitivity, even if it means revealing your vulnerability. Emotions, energy and communication must not be neglected; concrete action is meaningless if it is not justified by your heart, your intellect or your enthusiasm.

Alexander DOWNER, Fire is dominant in your natal chart and endows you with intuition, energy, courage, self-confidence and enthusiasm! You are inclined to be passionate, you assert your willpower, you move forward, and come hell or high water, you achieve your dreams and your goals. The relative weakness of this element is the difficulty to step back or a kind of boldness that may prompt you to do foolish things.

Your natal chart shows a lack of the Water element, with only % instead of the average 25%. Whether you are aware of it or not, affective values bring about problems, for you or your close friends. In generally, a lack of Water does not necessarily mean that you are unable to love as much as others do, however, you may find it difficult to express the deepness of your heart and of your feelings. In the best cases, you come to terms with it, you adjust, you manage to show more affection or, why not, you pretend to be really affected?! In the worst cases, you get into the terrible habit of repressing these essential values and you tend to forget that they are the basis of the richest and strongest bonds between human beings.

The Mutable mode is the most emphasized one in your natal chart, which indicates a mobile character that is curious and thirsty for new experiences and evolution. You are lively and flexible, you like to react quickly to solicitations but don't confuse mobility with agitation, this is the danger with this configuration - and with you, stagnation is out of the question. Security doesn't matter as long as you are not bored. You optimize, you change things, you change yourself... all this in a speedy way.

The emphasis is on succedent houses in your chart, namely, the 2nd, 5th, 8th and 11th houses: this configuration usually endows a personality with affective and sensitive qualities. Obviously, to the detriment of self-confidence or self-assertion, but your heart qualities may be very important. These houses also favour realization. Time and patience are part of their characteristics. However, they are only indications and you must include them in the rest of your chart in order to see whether they are validated or not!

Downer did nothing at all

Ian I agree with a lot of this but have to take exception with the Suharto thing.   He was not the worst monster on the planet and any vague part Downer might have played after he stopped lying has all been wasted with his scoundrel behaviour over Iraq and Afghanistan.

To their credit no ALP government has ever led us into a pre-emptive strike on another country that has caused the devastation and destruction and slaughter to rival that of Iraq.  

As for Smith, he is not doing a bad job cleaning up the disasters left by the idiot Downer and Gareth Evans has become well respected for his human rights work.

Downer will never be respected for anything.

Not a monster

Marilyn Shepherd, so Suharto was not the worst monster. Compared to Whitlam I agree with you.

The Whitlam Labor government in Australia was closely briefed on the preparations for the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in 1975, including a preliminary attack on Balibo where five Australian television newsmen were murdered by Indonesian or Indonesian-backed forces.

Just like Howard was briefed by the USA prior to them invading Iraq.

The government then covered up its knowledge of the Balibo deaths to hide its complicity in the invasion.

At least Howard was not involved in the murder of Australians the way Whitlam and the ALP were.

It was known that the Whitlam government had encouraged the Indonesian invasion. Whitlam had personally told General Suharto during a meeting in Jakarta in September 1974 that the Australian government supported the incorporation of East Timor into Indonesia. It was also known that Whitlam had held a further meeting with Suharto to discuss the Timor issue in the northern Australian city of Townsville in April 1975.

It makes you wonder what other crimes Whitlam would have committed if the Australian electorate had not thrown him out.

Fiona: Alan, please be careful (1) about distinguishing between material that you are quoting, and your own words, and (2) to provide a link or other appropriate reference to quoted material. Your comment as first published was, to put it mildly, misleading.

Evans and human rights?

Marilyn, Jose Ramos-Horta said after East Timor gained its independence, that the Australian politicians "who betrayed us" - which included the PMs from Whitlam to Keating inclusive, and their foreign ministers, would be forgotten in East Timor, but that John Howard would be remembered. Howard was the only PM that Ramos-Horta had any time for. Fact. Downer assisted Howard in turning policy around on East Timorese independence.

Iraq, for all its controversy here at Webdiary and in the wider world, was never a big foreign policy issue for Australia. The trickiest, bloodiest and most difficult one has ever been East Timor. The ALP emerged from that dripping with the blood of the East Timorese, and all the "human rights work" of Evans since, which I question anyway, can never make up for the appalling ALP policy ever since Whitlam.

Downer downed and outed

A good appraisal of Downer today by the SMH's Peter Hartcher.

I would agree, but I don't.

Fiona and Jacob: I have to say that I agree with Bernard Keane's total bucketing of Downer.

Totally.

Well, almost.

I can't take on board his opening statement:

"That Downer was our worst foreign minister of recent decades goes without saying. Possibly he was our worst ever, but that’s a matter for foreign policy PhDs. "

Downer was an appalling Foreign Minister, true enough. But the simple undeniable fact is that every preceding one since Sir Paul Hasluck was worse. That in my opinion leaves Downer, that arrogant, egotistical buffoon with that monstrously inflated idea of his own importance to Australia and the world, as our best (God help us!) Foreign Minister for the last 40 years.

If any should disagree, let them choose their preferred name from the following list: Casey, Spender, Hasluck, Hayden, Peacock, Evans, Downer, Smith. (I don't think I've missed any.)

Smith has already shown that he is in over his head at the deep end, and that he should be in the toddlers' pool. The Indonesians (and everyone else) will have him for breakfast. Correction: for a mid-morning snack.

Casey, the former Governor of Bengal, was an imperialist of the old school (and the only Liberal Bob Menzies was genuinely afraid of.) Spender had only a short time in the office, but successfully crafted the ANZUS Treaty.

Hasluck was a member of that that rare species; scholar turned Liberal politician. He was accused by critics on the left of blindly following the US, and of lacking independence. But the ex-diplomat turned academic Gregory Clark in his book In Fear of China (1967) showed that indeed Australia did have an independent foreign policy: namely to do whatever was necessary to keep the US engaged in Asia. Hasluck was in charge of it. I didn't agree with it at the time, and still don't. But he was his own man.

The proverbial drover's dog would have been just as capable of tagging along at the heels of the government of the day as Hayden, Peacock, and Evans, except that the latter two will live on in the history of infamy for their roles in accommodating the Suharto regime in Indonesia during its genocidal invasion and occupation of East Timor. Downer, however clumsily, however timidly, helped terminate that vile Indonesian occupation.

I concluded long ago that there is something in the job of being Australian Foreign Minister that makes only the most obsequious and gutless politicians qualified to fill it.

I would like to be proved wrong. But, doubting the possibility of that, I can only say I wish it were otherwise.

He has a sinecure

Bliar is a war criminal kept out of court with the dopey notion that he can bring peace between the Palestinians and the Israelis.

Both sides of the battle listen to Bliar and say "Iraq" and laugh. The same will happen to Dolly.

The magic of Alex

Hugh Pope from the International Crisis Group says the conflict on Cyprus has defeated many mediators in the past.

"I think Alexander Downer's got a lot of reading to do," he said.

"It's a conflict where everybody has to be really careful about the vocabulary used."

** jacob shudders **

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2005-2011, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner

Recent Comments

Marilyn Shepherd: Yes Jay in Why? 6 hours 43 min ago
John Pratt: All rivers start as a rain drop in A Warning from the Past 16 hours 16 min ago
Jay Somasundaram: How? in Why? 16 hours 29 min ago
Jay Somasundaram: Birds seldom differ in A Warning from the Past 17 hours 25 min ago
Fiona Reynolds: The ultimate betrayal of trust in Why? 17 hours 34 min ago
John Pratt: Killing children anywhere is revolting in Why? 18 hours 4 min ago
Marilyn Shepherd: I agree, but in Why? 18 hours 25 min ago
Richard Tonkin: How could he? in Why? 19 hours 43 min ago
Fiona Reynolds: Parents... in No time to be afraid of budget deficits 22 hours 6 min ago