Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

Israel's 60th birthday - Bush The Crusader lights the candles

How many protectors of Jerusalem over the centures would have loved this opportunity? On a visit to mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of the country, President Bush yesterday delivered this speech of Biblical proportions (which only varies from the prepared text in the blessings at beginning and end) to the Israeli parliament:

 

President Peres and Mr. Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, thank very much for hosting this special session. President Beinish, Leader of the Opposition Netanyahu, Ministers, members of the Knesset, distinguished guests: Shalom. Laura and I are thrilled to be back in Israel. We have been deeply moved by the celebrations of the past two days. And this afternoon, I am honored to stand before one of the world's great democratic assemblies and convey the wishes of the American people with these words: Yom Ha'atzmaut Sameach. (Applause.)

It is a rare privilege for the American President to speak to the Knesset. (Laughter.) Although the Prime Minister told me there is something even rarer -- to have just one person in this chamber speaking at a time. (Laughter.) My only regret is that one of Israel's greatest leaders is not here to share this moment. He is a warrior for the ages, a man of peace, a friend. The prayers of the American people are with Ariel Sharon. (Applause.)

We gather to mark a momentous occasion. Sixty years ago in Tel Aviv, David Ben-Gurion proclaimed Israel's independence, founded on the "natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate." What followed was more than the establishment of a new country. It was the redemption of an ancient promise given to Abraham and Moses and David -- a homeland for the chosen people Eretz Yisrael.

Eleven minutes later, on the orders of President Harry Truman, the United States was proud to be the first nation to recognize Israel's independence. And on this landmark anniversary, America is proud to be Israel's closest ally and best friend in the world.

The alliance between our governments is unbreakable, yet the source of our friendship runs deeper than any treaty. It is grounded in the shared spirit of our people, the bonds of the Book, the ties of the soul. When William Bradford stepped off the Mayflower in 1620, he quoted the words of Jeremiah: "Come let us declare in Zion the word of God." The founders of my country saw a new promised land and bestowed upon their towns names like Bethlehem and New Canaan. And in time, many Americans became passionate advocates for a Jewish state.

Centuries of suffering and sacrifice would pass before the dream was fulfilled. The Jewish people endured the agony of the pogroms, the tragedy of the Great War, and the horror of the Holocaust -- what Elie Wiesel called "the kingdom of the night." Soulless men took away lives and broke apart families. Yet they could not take away the spirit of the Jewish people, and they could not break the promise of God. (Applause.) When news of Israel's freedom finally arrived, Golda Meir, a fearless woman raised in Wisconsin, could summon only tears. She later said: "For two thousand years we have waited for our deliverance. Now that it is here it is so great and wonderful that it surpasses human words."

The joy of independence was tempered by the outbreak of battle, a struggle that has continued for six decades. Yet in spite of the violence, in defiance of the threats, Israel has built a thriving democracy in the heart of the Holy Land. You have welcomed immigrants from the four corners of the Earth. You have forged a free and modern society based on the love of liberty, a passion for justice, and a respect for human dignity. You have worked tirelessly for peace. You have fought valiantly for freedom.

My country's admiration for Israel does not end there. When Americans look at Israel, we see a pioneer spirit that worked an agricultural miracle and now leads a high-tech revolution. We see world-class universities and a global leader in business and innovation and the arts. We see a resource more valuable than oil or gold: the talent and determination of a free people who refuse to let any obstacle stand in the way of their destiny.

I have been fortunate to see the character of Israel up close. I have touched the Western Wall, seen the sun reflected in the Sea of Galilee, I have prayed at Yad Vashem. And earlier today, I visited Masada, an inspiring monument to courage and sacrifice. At this historic site, Israeli soldiers swear an oath: "Masada shall never fall again." Citizens of Israel: Masada shall never fall again, and America will be at your side.

This anniversary is a time to reflect on the past. It's also an opportunity to look to the future. As we go forward, our alliance will be guided by clear principles -- shared convictions rooted in moral clarity and unswayed by popularity polls or the shifting opinions of international elites.

We believe in the matchless value of every man, woman, and child. So we insist that the people of Israel have the right to a decent, normal, and peaceful life, just like the citizens of every other nation. (Applause.)

We believe that democracy is the only way to ensure human rights. So we consider it a source of shame that the United Nations routinely passes more human rights resolutions against the freest democracy in the Middle East than any other nation in the world. (Applause.)

We believe that religious liberty is fundamental to a civilized society. So we condemn anti-Semitism in all forms -- whether by those who openly question Israel's right to exist, or by others who quietly excuse them.

We believe that free people should strive and sacrifice for peace. So we applaud the courageous choices Israeli's leaders have made. We also believe that nations have a right to defend themselves and that no nation should ever be forced to negotiate with killers pledged to its destruction. (Applause.)

We believe that targeting innocent lives to achieve political objectives is always and everywhere wrong. So we stand together against terror and extremism, and we will never let down our guard or lose our resolve. (Applause.)

The fight against terror and extremism is the defining challenge of our time. It is more than a clash of arms. It is a clash of visions, a great ideological struggle. On the one side are those who defend the ideals of justice and dignity with the power of reason and truth. On the other side are those who pursue a narrow vision of cruelty and control by committing murder, inciting fear, and spreading lies.

This struggle is waged with the technology of the 21st century, but at its core it is an ancient battle between good and evil. The killers claim the mantle of Islam, but they are not religious men. No one who prays to the God of Abraham could strap a suicide vest to an innocent child, or blow up guiltless guests at a Passover Seder, or fly planes into office buildings filled with unsuspecting workers. In truth, the men who carry out these savage acts serve no higher goal than their own desire for power. They accept no God before themselves. And they reserve a special hatred for the most ardent defenders of liberty, including Americans and Israelis.

And that is why the founding charter of Hamas calls for the "elimination" of Israel. And that is why the followers of Hezbollah chant "Death to Israel, Death to America!" That is why Osama bin Laden teaches that "the killing of Jews and Americans is one of the biggest duties." And that is why the President of Iran dreams of returning the Middle East to the Middle Ages and calls for Israel to be wiped off the map.

There are good and decent people who cannot fathom the darkness in these men and try to explain away their words. It's natural, but it is deadly wrong. As witnesses to evil in the past, we carry a solemn responsibility to take these words seriously. Jews and Americans have seen the consequences of disregarding the words of leaders who espouse hatred. And that is a mistake the world must not repeat in the 21st century.

Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history. (Applause.)

Some people suggest if the United States would just break ties with Israel, all our problems in the Middle East would go away. This is a tired argument that buys into the propaganda of the enemies of peace, and America utterly rejects it. Israel's population may be just over 7 million. But when you confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because the United States of America stands with you. (Applause.)

America stands with you in breaking up terrorist networks and denying the extremists sanctuary. America stands with you in firmly opposing Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions. Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the world's deadliest weapons would be an unforgivable betrayal for future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. (Applause.)

Ultimately, to prevail in this struggle, we must offer an alternative to the ideology of the extremists by extending our vision of justice and tolerance and freedom and hope. These values are the self-evident right of all people, of all religions, in all the world because they are a gift from the Almighty God. Securing these rights is also the surest way to secure peace. Leaders who are accountable to their people will not pursue endless confrontation and bloodshed. Young people with a place in their society and a voice in their future are less likely to search for meaning in radicalism. Societies where citizens can express their conscience and worship their God will not export violence, they will be partners in peace.

The fundamental insight, that freedom yields peace, is the great lesson of the 20th century. Now our task is to apply it to the 21st. Nowhere is this work more urgent than here in the Middle East. We must stand with the reformers working to break the old patterns of tyranny and despair. We must give voice to millions of ordinary people who dream of a better life in a free society. We must confront the moral relativism that views all forms of government as equally acceptable and thereby consigns whole societies to slavery. Above all, we must have faith in our values and ourselves and confidently pursue the expansion of liberty as the path to a peaceful future.

That future will be a dramatic departure from the Middle East of today. So as we mark 60 years from Israel's founding, let us try to envision the region 60 years from now. This vision is not going to arrive easily or overnight; it will encounter violent resistance. But if we and future Presidents and future Knessets maintain our resolve and have faith in our ideals, here is the Middle East that we can see:

Israel will be celebrating the 120th anniversary as one of the world's great democracies, a secure and flourishing homeland for the Jewish people. The Palestinian people will have the homeland they have long dreamed of and deserved -- a democratic state that is governed by law, and respects human rights, and rejects terror. From Cairo to Riyadh to Baghdad and Beirut, people will live in free and independent societies, where a desire for peace is reinforced by ties of diplomacy and tourism and trade. Iran and Syria will be peaceful nations, with today's oppression a distant memory and where people are free to speak their minds and develop their God-given talents. Al Qaeda and Hezbollah and Hamas will be defeated, as Muslims across the region recognize the emptiness of the terrorists' vision and the injustice of their cause.

Overall, the Middle East will be characterized by a new period of tolerance and integration. And this doesn't mean that Israel and its neighbors will be best of friends. But when leaders across the region answer to their people, they will focus their energies on schools and jobs, not on rocket attacks and suicide bombings. With this change, Israel will open a new hopeful chapter in which its people can live a normal life, and the dream of Herzl and the founders of 1948 can be fully and finally realized.

This is a bold vision, and some will say it can never be achieved. But think about what we have witnessed in our own time. When Europe was destroying itself through total war and genocide, it was difficult to envision a continent that six decades later would be free and at peace. When Japanese pilots were flying suicide missions into American battleships, it seemed impossible that six decades later Japan would be a democracy, a lynchpin of security in Asia, and one of America's closest friends. And when waves of refugees arrived here in the desert with nothing, surrounded by hostile armies, it was almost unimaginable that Israel would grow into one of the freest and most successful nations on the earth.

Yet each one of these transformations took place. And a future of transformation is possible in the Middle East, so long as a new generation of leaders has the courage to defeat the enemies of freedom, to make the hard choices necessary for peace, and stand firm on the solid rock of universal values.

Sixty years ago, on the eve of Israel's independence, the last British soldiers departing Jerusalem stopped at a building in the Jewish quarter of the Old City. An officer knocked on the door and met a senior rabbi. The officer presented him with a short iron bar -- the key to the Zion Gate -- and said it was the first time in 18 centuries that a key to the gates of Jerusalem had belonged to a Jew. His hands trembling, the rabbi offered a prayer of thanksgiving to God, "Who had granted us life and permitted us to reach this day." Then he turned to the officer, and uttered the words Jews had awaited for so long: "I accept this key in the name of my people."

Over the past six decades, the Jewish people have established a state that would make that humble rabbi proud.  You have raised a modern society in the Promised Land, a light unto the nations that preserves the legacy of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob.  And you have built a mighty democracy that will endure forever and can always count on the United States of America to be at your side. 

God bless.

left
right
[ category: ]
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bush Craving Armageddon

"This struggle is waged with the technology of the 21st century, but at its core it is an ancient battle between good and evil."

And who do you think Bush thinks he is?

Eliot, I admire your tenacity. I'm betting that the last six months of this US administration will contain endgames by the dozen. With that thought in mind I'm off back to the PNAC site for a refresher.

I too, Ian, was quite taken with the sixty year projection.

Now, I am I reading too much into the changing of "Shalom" to "Happy Indepence Day" and "God bless the state of Israel" to a more down-home "god bless," or were those original words considered to contain an overload of religious semantics?

 

A bob each way

"Eleven minutes later, on the orders of President Harry Truman, the United States was proud to be the first nation to recognize Israel's independence. And on this landmark anniversary, America is proud to be Israel's closest ally and best friend in the world. "

Well, that's not strictly true. The Soviets were able to supply the newly formed Israeli defense forces with weapons through the USSR's newly acquired Czechoslovak proxies, hoping to have a bob each way while publicly "denouncing" Zionism. I mean, there were lots of old socialists involved in setting up Israel.

But none of that will compare with the hypocrisy that would ensue if (when) the Left's new allies in Hezbolla, Hamas and Iran achieve their stated objective.

Consider ye the 6th last paragraph by Bush

Here beginneth the lesson, taken from the first chapter of the Revelation According to St George W Bush:

[In sixty years' time] "Israel will be celebrating the 120th anniversary as one of the world's great democracies, a secure and flourishing homeland for the Jewish people. The Palestinian people will have the homeland they have long dreamed of and deserved -- a democratic state that is governed by law, and respects human rights, and rejects terror. From Cairo to Riyadh to Baghdad and Beirut, people will live in free and independent societies, where a desire for peace is reinforced by ties of diplomacy and tourism and trade. Iran and Syria will be peaceful nations, with today's oppression a distant memory and where people are free to speak their minds and develop their God-given talents. Al Qaeda and Hezbollah and Hamas will be defeated, as Muslims across the region recognize the emptiness of the terrorists' vision and the injustice of their cause. "

The grandness and glory of this vision is just a bit blotted by the fact that Bush chooses to see only one side of the whole sorry story of the origins of Zionism and Israel. There is right on both sides, but each side understandably prefers to concentrate on the rightness which it possesses and to ignore the other's. That is what has kept the conflict going since WW2, but all Bush can see is a future based on the Muslims' throwing in the sponge, taking a sympathetic view of the position of their present enemies, and adopting their enemies' ways and values.

So, let us assume, in sixty years time the wall and all the checkpoints will be gone and all the illegal Jewish settlements handed over to the Palestinians. (To think that this grand vision might come to pass without that development is purest fancy.) Let us assume also that those Arabs driven out of Palestine, and their descendants who still regard themselves as Palestinians in exile, will have been welcomed back by Jew and Arab alike, and that Arabs will not only be the total Palestinian population, but the majority in Israel as well. (That may turn out to be the deomographic reality in the region in less than sixty years time anyway.)

Bush could have added, if he was true to the doctrines of his own religion, that both Jews and Arabs, having seen the error of their ways, will by then have abandoned their former false religions and converted to Christianity, preferably to the same one variety thereof, as I can't imagine anything worse for peace than the Jews all converting to Catholicism and the Muslims all becoming Protestants. And I am sure the whole Knesset would agree on that, even if it can't agree on anything else.

The Jewish Holocaust in Europe led directly to what the Palestinians call the Catastrophe. Each of the peoples involved were plunged into the tragedy of dispossession, war and exile, with the European Jews having suffered mass murder at the hands of the German Nazis and their European sympathisers, and the Palestinians merely suffering murder on a less than massive scale, poverty, exile and ghettoisation in places like Gaza. The Jews in short, did to the Palestinians what the Nazis had done to them. In much the same manner, Scottish and English peasants, who had been driven out of their ancestral lands by the upper classes' enclosures of the commons, did the same in turn to the native peoples of North America and Australasia.

With 20/20 hindsight we can see that it probably would have been better if the Jewish homeland had been set up in Bavaria, where the Nazi movement began, rather than in Palestine. The Bavarian Germans might not exactly have been enthusiastic about it, but at least there would have been more justice in that solution than in the Palestinian Arabs being invited by the UN to pay the price they did for the Nazi Holocaust, for which they bore no moral responsibility whatever.

Vision

Ian: "The Palestinian people will have the homeland they have long dreamed of and deserved -- a democratic state that is governed by law, and respects human rights, and rejects terror. From Cairo to Riyadh to Baghdad and Beirut, people will live in free and independent societies."

You have to be kidding. The Lebanese are killing there own people as I write and in Baghdad there are people building bombs to use on their own people. What you have to realise is that Israel is there to stay, and if the Palestinians try to push them out they will pay a heavy price.

Yes, I would have had to be kidding, Alan.

Alan, a propos of Scott's comment, you are quite right: I would have had to be kidding, or smoking mental dynamite for a few days straight in order to come up with those words, which were not mine but rightfully belong to GWB.

Not that it is wrong for people to have such grand hopes for the Middle East. It's just that it does not take much reading between the lines of Bush's Revelatory (as in that of St John the Divine) vision to see that it involves the Zionists giving nothing back, and the Palestinians conceding yet more.

If I was a cynic, I would say that it was set up to fall flat on its grandiose face.

Seamus Milne has an interesting piece on this subject in the Guardian's Comment is Free site of May 15, and Norman Geras has posted a response to it, which in contrast with most of Geras' writings, I find less than compelling.

 However, he does make a valid comparison of the Palestinian Nakba (or Catastrophe) with the dispossession by colonisation of the native peoples of North America and Australasia. This leads naturally to the question: "How could those colonisations have been handled so they could have been of benefit to both peoples concerned, and not just to the benefit of one at the enormous expense of the other?"

The European colonisers after Columbus and Cook would have had to think so far outside the squares set up by their own historic circumstances as to make this impossible in their own times, and so a purely academic and modern exercise. But perhaps if we think of what should have happened, we might be able to see what could still happen, in the Americas, Australasia and Palestine.

I will write a bit more on this I hope in the near future.

The tragedy that is Palestine

Thank you Ian for providing those links, they have raised a few issues.

I will not comment on Seamus Milne’s piece other than to say that it is factually correct and in my estimation, his conclusions are reasoned.

Norman Geras’ response, however, is something else. My impression is that it was contrived and disingenuous. To use such an obscure word as “trope” is effete and contextually incorrect; I found nothing in Milne’s piece that could be described as figurative or ironic

“I mean, he's a good guide to how a certain section of the left - not to put too fine a point on it, the regrettable section - thinks.”

(Not too fine a point at all old chap; can’t let that sort in club can we? Damn fellows are getting ideas above their station.)

One gains the impression that concerns for justice, fairness and equity is somehow the exclusive domain of left leaning libertarians.

Strangely there is a large element of truth in that statement, but why? This could be the basis for a blog by itself (but not from me.) Throw in the fact that, at least in this country, the Right bemoans the fact that it is unrepresented intellectually. (They haven’t worked it out yet but then that would require an admission.)

The fact is I have been a member of that group all my life but did not develop Palestinian sympathies until my late thirties after starting to think for myself and accepting the reality of dispossession, an ongoing occurrence and the injustice of it all. It appears to me that the Right has adopted the notion that “Of course in a perfect world such niceties are all well and good but in reality they just get in the way of business.”

“What you will find is that the 'yes' carries no legitimating force at all and that the 'but' lays claim to all of such force.”

And why not, how can the dreadful fate that befell some six million souls justify the visitation on a helpless and hapless people that had inhabited what was then Palestine for two thousand years by a bunch of terrorists and carpet baggers, no few of whom were not victims of the holocaust.

Perhaps the motivation of Britain in particular was to divest itself of a social problem of over a thousand years standing. That of having a minority, recalcitrant in that it refused to integrate fully with mainstream society, a source of envy and at times, the cause of social disruption. There was probably an element of guilt there as well; anti Semitic sentiment was alive and well in my childhood.

My preference is for a single state. Regardless of the injustice suffered by the Palestinians there can be no denial of the state of Israel. There is no such thing as absolute justice; meted out it almost invariably creates other victims.

How this can happen Christ knows, you couldn’t get the buggers to agree on a name let alone anything else.

As long as the West gives Israel support materially and tolerates its abysmal behaviour the problem will remain intractable.

Maybe we can gain some comfort from Robbie Burns, “For aye that an’ aye that” but I doubt it. Maybe in another 200,000 years.

Eh hem

Alan, I think you'd better read Ian's piece again.

Vision AND hope

Alan Curran, what do you have to say, then, to all those Israelis who are busy building bridges to the Palestinians, and vice versa? Are they fools?

I wish Sid Drate were still around - he at least seemed to have some understanding of the futile horror that this conflict means to the innocents on both sides.

The "Great Satan",ethnic cleansing and the "War on Terror".

The Jewish terror continued, now in its bloodiest form, after the United Nations resolved in November 1947 that Palestine should be partitioned, a decision rejected by the Arabs. The slaughter in April 1948 of some 250 men, women and children of the harmless Arab village of Deir Yassin is well known. Hardly known yet is the atrocity of Al-Tantura, a scarcely defended village where more than 200 inhabitants, mostly unarmed young men, were massacred in May 1948. Neither village now exists.

Professor Ilan Pappe, an historian at Haifa University (if his threatened expulsion has not come about) says recent research into Al-Tantura is historically important for the further light it throws on Israel's expulsion, direct and indirect, of some 750,000 Palestinians, the systematic destruction of more than 400 villages and scores of urban neighbourhoods, as well as the perpetration of some 40 massacres of unarmed Palestinians.

It was, of course, ethnic cleansing.

David Bowman is a former editor-in-chief of the Sydney Morning Herald. This article is published by arrangement with the Adelaide Review. His contributions appear monthly at APO.

The continued support of Israel by the US has been the root of the so called "War on Terror". Terror was used by the founders of Israel and terror is being used by those trying to recover their homeland. Is it any wonder that many Islamists see the US as the "Great Satan"? If only those who sanctioned the destruction of 400 Palestinian villages could walk in the shoes of the Palestinian people for a while. It is the Palestinians who have been the victims and have suffered the most.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2006, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.