Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

Where have all the leaders gone?

The son of Italian immigrants, Lee Iacocca’s career in the American motor industry (as an engineer, in sales, in product development, and ultimately as CEO of Ford and then of Chrysler) spanned four decades. Notably, he rescued Chrysler from its death throes. Also – interestingly – Iacocca backed George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election, but switched his support to John Kerry in the 2004 election. In Where have all the leaders gone?, published almost exactly one year ago, Iacocca condemns with venom the Bush administration and is scathing of the lack of strong leadership in the US government. There is a substantial extract from the beginning of the book on several websites, which is now also published on Webdiary. As Clinton and Obama continue their duel à l'outrance for the Democratic nomination, Iacocca’s words seem particularly timely.

Where have all the leaders gone?

by Lee Iacocca with Catherine Whitney

Had Enough?

Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the hell is our outrage? We should be screaming bloody murder. We've got a gang of clueless bozos steering our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even clean up after a hurricane much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, "Stay the course."

Stay the course? You've got to be kidding. This is America, not the damned Titanic. I'll give you a sound bite: Throw the bums out!

You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore. The President of the United States is given a free pass to ignore the Constitution, tap our phones, and lead us to war on a pack of lies. Congress responds to record deficits by passing a huge tax cut for the wealthy (thanks, but I don't need it). The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs. While we're fiddling in Iraq, the Middle East is burning and nobody seems to know what to do. And the press is waving pom-poms instead of asking hard questions. That's not the promise of America my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How about you?

I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have.

My friends tell me to calm down. They say, "Lee, you're eighty-two years old. Leave the rage to the young people." I'd love to—as soon as I can pry them away from their iPods for five seconds and get them to pay attention. I'm going to speak up because it's my patriotic duty. I think people will listen to me. They say I have a reputation as a straight shooter. So I'll tell you how I see it, and it's not pretty, but at least it's real. I'm hoping to strike a nerve in those young folks who say they don't vote because they don't trust politicians to represent their interests. Hey, America, wake up. These guys work for us.

Who Are These Guys, Anyway?

Why are we in this mess? How did we end up with this crowd in Washington? Well, we voted for them—or at least some of us did. But I'll tell you what we didn't do. We didn't agree to suspend the Constitution. We didn't agree to stop asking questions or demanding answers. Some of us are sick and tired of people who call free speech treason. Where I come from that's a dictatorship, not a democracy.

And don't tell me it's all the fault of right-wing Republicans or liberal Democrats. That's an intellectually lazy argument, and it's part of the reason we're in this stew. We're not just a nation of factions. We're a people. We share common principles and ideals. And we rise and fall together.

Where are the voices of leaders who can inspire us to action and make us stand taller? What happened to the strong and resolute party of Lincoln? What happened to the courageous, populist party of FDR and Truman? There was a time in this country when the voices of great leaders lifted us up and made us want to do better. Where have all the leaders gone?

The Test of a Leader

I've never been Commander in Chief, but I've been a CEO. I understand a few things about leadership at the top. I've figured out nine points—not ten (I don't want people accusing me of thinking I'm Moses). I call them the "Nine Cs of Leadership." They're not fancy or complicated. Just clear, obvious qualities that every true leader should have. We should look at how the current administration stacks up. Like it or not, this crew is going to be around until January 2009. Maybe we can learn something before we go to the polls in 2008. Then let's be sure we use the leadership test to screen the candidates who say they want to run the country. It's up to us to choose wisely.

So, here's my C list:

A leader has to show CURIOSITY. He has to listen to people outside of the "Yes, sir" crowd in his inner circle. He has to read voraciously, because the world is a big, complicated place. George W. Bush brags about never reading a newspaper. "I just scan the headlines," he says. Am I hearing this right? He's the President of the United States and he never reads a newspaper? Thomas Jefferson once said, "Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate for a moment to prefer the latter." Bush disagrees. As long as he gets his daily hour in the gym, with Fox News piped through the sound system, he's ready to go.

If a leader never steps outside his comfort zone to hear different ideas, he grows stale. If he doesn't put his beliefs to the test, how does he know he's right? The inability to listen is a form of arrogance. It means either you think you already know it all, or you just don't care. Before the 2006 election, George Bush made a big point of saying he didn't listen to the polls. Yeah, that's what they all say when the polls stink. But maybe he should have listened, because 70 percent of the people were saying he was on the wrong track. It took a "thumping" on election day to wake him up, but even then you got the feeling he wasn't listening so much as he was calculating how to do a better job of convincing everyone he was right.

A leader has to be CREATIVE, go out on a limb, be willing to try something different. You know, think outside the box. George Bush prides himself on never changing, even as the world around him is spinning out of control. God forbid someone should accuse him of flip-flopping. There's a disturbingly messianic fervor to his certainty. Senator Joe Biden recalled a conversation he had with Bush a few months after our troops marched into Baghdad. Joe was in the Oval Office outlining his concerns to the President—the explosive mix of Shiite and Sunni, the disbanded Iraqi army, the problems securing the oil fields. "The President was serene," Joe recalled. "He told me he was sure that we were on the right course and that all would be well. 'Mr. President,' I finally said, 'how can you be so sure when you don't yet know all the facts?'" Bush then reached over and put a steadying hand on Joe's shoulder. "My instincts," he said. "My instincts." Joe was flabbergasted. He told Bush, "Mr. President, your instincts aren't good enough." Joe Biden sure didn't think the matter was settled. And, as we all know now, it wasn't.

Leadership is all about managing change—whether you're leading a company or leading a country. Things change, and you get creative. You adapt. Maybe Bush was absent the day they covered that at Harvard Business School.

A leader has to COMMUNICATE. I'm not talking about running off at the mouth or spouting sound bites. I'm talking about facing reality and telling the truth. Nobody in the current administration seems to know how to talk straight anymore. Instead, they spend most of their time trying to convince us that things are not really as bad as they seem. I don't know if it's denial or dishonesty, but it can start to drive you crazy after a while. Communication has to start with telling the truth, even when it's painful. The war in Iraq has been, among other things, a grand failure of communication. Bush is like the boy who didn't cry wolf when the wolf was at the door. After years of being told that all is well, even as the casualties and chaos mount, we've stopped listening to him.

A leader has to be a person of CHARACTER. That means knowing the difference between right and wrong and having the guts to do the right thing. Abraham Lincoln once said, "If you want to test a man's character, give him power." George Bush has a lot of power. What does it say about his character? Bush has shown a willingness to take bold action on the world stage because he has the power, but he shows little regard for the grievous consequences. He has sent our troops (not to mention hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens) to their deaths—for what? To build our oil reserves? To avenge his daddy because Saddam Hussein once tried to have him killed? To show his daddy he's tougher? The motivations behind the war in Iraq are questionable, and the execution of the war has been a disaster. A man of character does not ask a single soldier to die for a failed policy.

A leader must have COURAGE. I'm talking about balls. (That even goes for female leaders.) Swagger isn't courage. Tough talk isn't courage. George Bush comes from a blue-blooded Connecticut family, but he likes to talk like a cowboy. You know, My gun is bigger than your gun. Courage in the twenty-first century doesn't mean posturing and bravado. Courage is a commitment to sit down at the negotiating table and talk.

If you're a politician, courage means taking a position even when you know it will cost you votes. Bush can't even make a public appearance unless the audience has been handpicked and sanitized. He did a series of so-called town hall meetings last year, in auditoriums packed with his most devoted fans. The questions were all softballs.

To be a leader you've got to have CONVICTION—a fire in your belly. You've got to have passion. You've got to really want to get something done. How do you measure fire in the belly? Bush has set the all-time record for number of vacation days taken by a U.S. President—four hundred and counting. He'd rather clear brush on his ranch than immerse himself in the business of governing. He even told an interviewer that the high point of his presidency so far was catching a seven-and-a-half-pound perch in his hand-stocked lake.

It's no better on Capitol Hill. Congress was in session only ninety-seven days in 2006. That's eleven days less than the record set in 1948, when President Harry Truman coined the term do-nothing Congress. Most people would expect to be fired if they worked so little and had nothing to show for it. But Congress managed to find the time to vote itself a raise. Now, that's not leadership.

A leader should have CHARISMA. I'm not talking about being flashy. Charisma is the quality that makes people want to follow you. It's the ability to inspire. People follow a leader because they trust him. That's my definition of charisma. Maybe George Bush is a great guy to hang out with at a barbecue or a ball game. But put him at a global summit where the future of our planet is at stake, and he doesn't look very presidential. Those frat-boy pranks and the kidding around he enjoys so much don't go over that well with world leaders. Just ask German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who received an unwelcome shoulder massage from our President at a G-8 Summit. When he came up behind her and started squeezing, I thought she was going to go right through the roof.

A leader has to be COMPETENT. That seems obvious, doesn't it? You've got to know what you're doing. More important than that, you've got to surround yourself with people who know what they're doing. Bush brags about being our first MBA President. Does that make him competent? Well, let's see. Thanks to our first MBA President, we've got the largest deficit in history, Social Security is on life support, and we've run up a half-a-trillion-dollar price tag (so far) in Iraq. And that's just for starters. A leader has to be a problem solver, and the biggest problems we face as a nation seem to be on the back burner.

You can't be a leader if you don't have COMMON SENSE. I call this Charlie Beacham's rule. When I was a young guy just starting out in the car business, one of my first jobs was as Ford's zone manager in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. My boss was a guy named Charlie Beacham, who was the East Coast regional manager. Charlie was a big Southerner, with a warm drawl, a huge smile, and a core of steel. Charlie used to tell me, "Remember, Lee, the only thing you've got going for you as a human being is your ability to reason and your common sense. If you don't know a dip of horseshit from a dip of vanilla ice cream, you'll never make it." George Bush doesn't have common sense. He just has a lot of sound bites. You know—Mr.they'll-welcome-us-as-liberators-no-child-left-behind-heck-of-a-job-Brownie-mission-accomplished Bush.

Former President Bill Clinton once said, "I grew up in an alcoholic home. I spent half my childhood trying to get into the reality-based world—and I like it here."

I think our current President should visit the real world once in a while.

The Biggest C is Crisis

Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of crisis. It's easy to sit there with your feet up on the desk and talk theory. Or send someone else's kids off to war when you've never seen a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world comes tumbling down.

On September 11, 2001, we needed a strong leader more than any other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of the ashes. Where was George Bush? He was reading a story about a pet goat to kids in Florida when he heard about the attacks. He kept sitting there for twenty minutes with a baffled look on his face. It's all on tape. You can see it for yourself. Then, instead of taking the quickest route back to Washington and immediately going on the air to reassure the panicked people of this country, he decided it wasn't safe to return to the White House. He basically went into hiding for the day—and he told Vice President Dick Cheney to stay put in his bunker. We were all frozen in front of our TVs, scared out of our wits, waiting for our leaders to tell us that we were going to be okay, and there was nobody home. It took Bush a couple of days to get his bearings and devise the right photo op at Ground Zero.

That was George Bush's moment of truth, and he was paralyzed. And what did he do when he'd regained his composure? He led us down the road to Iraq—a road his own father had considered disastrous when he was President. But Bush didn't listen to Daddy. He listened to a higher father. He prides himself on being faith based, not reality based. If that doesn't scare the crap out of you, I don't know what will.

A Hell of a Mess

So here's where we stand. We're immersed in a bloody war with no plan for winning and no plan for leaving. We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the country. We're losing the manufacturing edge to Asia, while our once-great companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs. Gas prices are skyrocketing, and nobody in power has a coherent energy policy. Our schools are in trouble. Our borders are like sieves. The middle class is being squeezed every which way. These are times that cry out for leadership.

But when you look around, you've got to ask: "Where have all the leaders gone?" Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where are the people of character, courage, conviction, competence, and common sense? I may be a sucker for alliteration, but I think you get the point.

Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo? We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy, and all we know how to do is react to things that have already happened.

Name me one leader who emerged from the crisis of Hurricane Katrina. Congress has yet to spend a single day evaluating the response to the hurricane, or demanding accountability for the decisions that were made in the crucial hours after the storm. Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping it doesn't happen again. Now, that's just crazy. Storms happen. Deal with it. Make a plan. Figure out what you're going to do the next time.

Name me an industry leader who is thinking creatively about how we can restore our competitive edge in manufacturing. Who would have believed that there could ever be a time when "the Big Three" referred to Japanese car companies? How did this happen—and more important, what are we going to do about it?

Name me a government leader who can articulate a plan for paying down the debt, or solving the energy crisis, or managing the health care problem. The silence is deafening. But these are the crises that are eating away at our country and milking the middle class dry.

I have news for the gang in Congress. We didn't elect you to sit on your asses and do nothing and remain silent while our democracy is being hijacked and our greatness is being replaced with mediocrity. What is everybody so afraid of? That some bobblehead on Fox News will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change?

Had Enough?

Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope. I believe in America. In my lifetime I've had the privilege of living through some of America's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises—the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Kennedy assassination, the Vietnam War, the 1970s oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years culminating with 9/11. If I've learned one thing, it's this: You don't get anywhere by standing on the sidelines waiting for somebody else to take action. Whether it's building a better car or building a better future for our children, we all have a role to play. That's the challenge I'm raising in this book. It's a call to action for people who, like me, believe in America. It's not too late, but it's getting pretty close. So let's shake off the horseshit and go to work. Let's tell 'em all we've had enough.

left
right
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Doers can be pleasers. Rudd sits on the fence.

The Bill Henson issue may make you popular with an evangelical base that certainly played a significant role in your election, but it's only brought you grief with the chatterers. It's like Churchill taking time off from the War Cabinet to involve himself in a blue over Lady Chatterley.

No PM in recent memory is as unassailable as you are. So don't waste time, effort and precious bodily fluids on the silly stuff. Go for the light on the hill, not the flashbulbs of the political paparazzi. Be Barack, not Hillary. Give us more gravitas.

At his best Rudd can be remarkable. His sorry day was politics at its finest and no one could have done it better had they had the courage to do it at all. For if the new PM had hearkened to the warnings of the pollsters he wouldn't have acted. Rudd's reward? A big boost in the polls as people who'd opposed the apology retrospectively changed their minds. That's what good governing is about. It proves that doers can be pleasers.

Phillip Adams in this morning's Australian.

Has Kevin Rudd lost his way? What motivates him? What is his vision for Australia? Is he serious about climate change? Will he be a doer or a pleaser?

Has he got any more rabbits in his hat, now that we have done the "Sorry" thing and pulled the troops out of Iraq? Has Rudd got the guts to make the big decisions on climate change and peak oil? 

Doer or a pleaser? Time will tell

I think you are right to be concerned John!

I for one, am still having trouble working out what Rudd stands for, too. Anyone know? One may not have liked Howard or Keating; however one had a fair idea of what they stood for.

He does appear to set a cracking pace expecting others(eg public service) to do the same. But, I have this uneasy feeling that though he is as busy as a bee, he is not pollinating too many flowers.

"Will he be a doer or a pleaser?" I think you've summed it up quite well, John.

You can't ever please everyone, as Rudd appears to be trying to do. He will soon have to make some tough decisions.

Time will tell I guess.

Doer or pleaser

Kathy, there must be millions of people who are now wondering what Rudd stands for. They are going to find out that he is a con-man. As each day passes it is being shown that Fuelwatch is a sham, as will Grocerywatch. As for that other rash promise "Housing Affordability" it will be a long long time before that is brought up, because that is another part of the huge con. As for his promise to keep downward pressure on Inflation to help "Working Families", let's see what the figures show this month.

Mississippi turning?

Heavens to Betsy – could the Republicans really be heading for big trouble in November? Yesterday saw the third congressional win by the Democrats in what have previously been “ruby-red” Republican strongholds – and this one in Mississippi, of all places.

And now John Edwards has endorsed Barack Obama and has called for the Democrats to unite.

November could be quite entertaining.

Leaders

An essential quality of leadership is surely humility – the unimpeachable willingness to listen to others, just in case they are right, but more importantly, because the interests of all are much more important than those of persons entrusted with decision-making power.

An example perhaps is Vaclav Havel 1st President of the Czech Republic

a world acclaimed writer, playwright, and statesman, with the quotes: 'contaminated moral environment', and 'People, your government has returned to you!' famous on many websites.

His speech is worth reading.

The ideal of humility can be assured by the removal of the absolute powers inherent in party politics, with the adoption of the secret ballot rule in parliament.

We need the leadership of sound, intelligent policies whose origin is not restricted to 'the leaders'. Parliament can then quickly establish the value of proposals and adopt the best without delay. And proposals which may seem strange at first glance need cause no fear, with their fate safely in the hands of a non-partisan parliament which is fully accountable to the people through the independence of all the representatives.

The world's last super power?

From the Information Clearing House, an interesting piece, if a little overblown:

Anglo-American Ascendancy Lost in Unnecessary Wars, by Paul Craig Roberts

In a new book that will infuriate the fake conservatives who inhabit the Republican Party, Patrick J. Buchanan documents how British self-righteousness, delusion, and hubris destroyed both the British Empire and Western ascendancy in two unnecessary wars launched by a small cabal of morons that ruled Britain.

An extract from the review:

The distinct American hubris that we are “the indispensable nation” and the braggadocio that we are an “omnipower” has us overcommitted in alliances that we cannot fulfill. Despite 25 percent of the Iraqi population killed, injured or displaced, the “world’s only superpower” cannot even control Baghdad. To deal with the pointless war we started in Afghanistan, we have had to sucker our NATO allies into a conflict that is no concern of theirs. Militarily overextended and with a faltering economy and collapsing currency, the cabal of morons that rules America still hopes to attack Iran, Syria, and to drive Hezbollah from Lebanon. American idiots in think tanks are busy at work drawing up plans about how the US is going to check China and prevent her emergence as a power beyond US control. The Republican presidential candidate has boasted that he will challenge Russia and bring Putin to heel.

Amazing. The world’s greatest debtor is going to take on the two powerful countries with the largest trade surpluses. According to the World Factbook, an annual publication of the CIA, Russia’s 2007 current account surplus is $465 billion and China’s is $363 billion. In contrast, the US current account deficit is $987 billion--an amount larger that the total deficits of all other countries in the world combined. The out-of-pocket and already incurred future cost of Bush’s wars of aggression is between $3 and $5 trillion, every dollar of which must be borrowed. That comes on top of the unfunded liabilities of the US government totaling $53 trillion. By any account the US is the world’s worst credit risk. The “mighty” US relies on foreigners to finance its consumption, its wars, and the daily operations of its government.

Delusions and 'leaders'

From the SMH; May 11, Spoils of self-destruction, Paul Daley.

Nelson, meanwhile, is at the point of no political return. He's in a lonely, malevolent place where close colleagues speak with forked tongues and every utterance is considered in the context of his flaccid leadership.

The thing about Brendan was that he's never had a plan. Beyond getting the leadership, he has had no blueprint at all about where he was going to take us," a prominent Liberal frontbencher and Nelson "supporter" told me. "You need somebody brave ... with a plan, without fear, somebody who doesn't sit around wondering if the time is right." With supporters like that … .

That sums up all my objections to the idea of political parties!

What sort of drongos sit around waiting for the ‘leader’ to come up with a policy plan?

If the system was working properly, the party policy would be just that, a party policy.

The first thing a party has to have is a philosophy. That is the difficult part. Once there is a clearly defined philosophy in place, decisions become relatively easy and straight forward.

That way a change of ‘leader’ doesn’t have the ‘party members’ wandering around like headless chooks waiting for somebody to have an idea. A change of leader would merely bring about a change in style, presentation and perhaps emphasis.

The Howard debacle is a perfect example of operating under the delusion that any one person has all the answers — ok, he had none of the answers, he was still trapped in the 12th or 13th century, or whenever it was he came from — or in fact any of the answers, or allowing any person to suffer the delusion that they have ‘the answers’.

The most effective method of handling this god king complex political ‘leaders’ succumb too, would be to strip away all the trappings.

The big cars, the drivers, the security, the aeroplane — drive yourself , take a taxi, ride a bike or walk, use the airlines for overseas trips, limit all political representation to two or three terms.

Pension on the same basis as the public service bods get, and no perks after leaving office.

Fiona: You won't get an argument from me, Peter.

Rethink leadership

Less is known about the middle ground between leadership's successes and failures (Kets de Vries, 1993) and about leadership within nontraditional organizations. Thayer (1988) suggests that researchers and practitioners have gone about the study of leadership in a way that predisposes us toward failure: "Is it possible that our highly scientized, rational, linear, cause-effect world-view actually prevents us from seeing what we might otherwise be able to see, from knowing what we really want to know about leadership?" (p. 237). Thayer proposes that theorists re-conceptualize leadership by describing leadership embedded within and inseparable from communication in specific situations and relationships. One context in which we may be able to rethink leadership is that of alternative organizing.

For centuries man has longed for the return of a messiah, a leader who will deliver us from evil. We have always demanded too much from our leaders. Look at recent Australian history: for the last decade we had the Liberal Party lead by a messiah whose word was gospel, a leader who has now led the Liberal Party into exile. Australia replaced that failed messiah with a new messiah, Kevin 07. We have put our future into his hands; we listen hopefully to his sermons on the mount. In NSW the mob is calling for the crucifixion of their messiah. The US is currently searching for a messiah to take them from the wilderness into the promised land.

Is it a good leader that we need or just good organisational processes that ensure we reach the promised land? After all, our leaders are all human and not messiahs. We must focus on the organisation not the leader.

Fascism?

I didn't bother reading most of this; I could see where it was going and nodded. Are you so sure Ian that Mailer's cautious assessment is wrong?

Nothing will change until everything goes pear shaped. No I'm not going to give it a time frame but it will inevitably happen. Nothing stays the same but the nature of change.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2006 - 2008, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.

Margo Kingston

Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner