Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
Law Council on NT Emergency LawsThis is the Law Council's Media Release from yesterday. See also The dissident view on Howard's martial law plan and Recommendations of the Sacred Children report Parliament Should Carefully Consider NT Emergency Plan Laws The Law Council is urging all Parliamentarians to carefully consider the Government’s NT Emergency Plan package of legislative measures when it is introduced into the Parliament later today. Law Council President Tim Bugg criticised Minister Mal Brough’s proposal to ram the legislation through the House of Representatives today and the Minister’s expressed intention to conclude Senate debates by week’s end. “While no doubt suited to the Government’s electoral timetable, the ultra-speedy passage of these Bills is also clearly designed to avoid public scrutiny not just from Aboriginal communities but also from other community bodies with legitimate concerns about the Government’s proposals,” Mr Bugg said. “We are advised that there has been very little meaningful consultation or partnership with the communities the Government claims it wants to assist. Nor, because of Government secrecy, is the broader community much wiser about what is currently either in or out of the plan,” he said. “When one considers how long the Government sat on its hands in regards to this issue in the first place, its sudden desire to rush the legislation through Parliament seems even harder to fathom.” The Law Council wrote to the Minister and the Prime Minister over a month ago expressing reservations about the plan as it then was. No reply has been received. Its concerns related to the proposed changes to the permit system, the proposed compulsory acquisition of Aboriginal townships, any move to limit courts’ discretions in sentencing and bail proceedings, compulsory medical examinations for Aboriginal children, the need for legal and interpreting services and other matters. “Some of the plan’s elements have been drastically moderated since first announced and that has principally been due to the force of public criticism levelled at them. Much of that criticism has been constructive and has helped save the Government from its own rhetoric. But the Government still appears to see any critic as an enemy that needs to be demonised and Parliament as a rubber stamp. The arrogance of the Government is palpable,” Mr Bugg concluded.
[ category: ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Govt. deprives 8000 people of work, dignity in remote NT
Howard is risking the destruction of many remote aboriginal communities. He is shutting down successful programs so he can get control of money paid to workers. This will cause more despair and loss of dignity. It is no way to prevent child abuse. Taking control away from aboriginals and giving it to white men in Canberra is a recipe for disaster.
Heffernan makes false accusations and should be sacked!
False accusations made by Bill Heffernan are a disgrace to the Australian Senate. Howard and his mates show their disdain for the truth. If Howard had any guts he would call for Heffernan's resignation.
Hundreds of millions of dollars stolen from indigenous Australia
No wonder indigenous communities are in trouble, its hard to believe that the Howard government has used money earmarked for indigenous affairs to oppose native title claims. We can't trust the federal government on indigenous affairs.
When the river runs dry
John, while I cannot find the reference now I read of questions also being asked as to what happens to the millions earned by the Central and Northern Land Council investments. As one indigenous person asked: Where does all that bloody money go?
Seems the indigenous people at the grass roots level draw the short straw all the time. I wrote on another thread that if all the money that had been allocated over the past three decades, and all the money the Land Councils had access to, was actually spent on indigenous communities, no indigenous person would be living in poverty or without education, housing and health services.
It seems to me the river of money is like the water in the Darling. Little ever gets to anyone downstream. A rather sorry state of affairs all round.
Time to listen to the Prophets
Dr Philip Freier, Anglican Archbishop of Melbourne, is right: we need these prophetic voices. In its own way Webdiary is one of these voices.
We need to make sure all voices are heard.
High Court would reject federal takeover
The High Court may reject the takeover of aboriginal land. Howard's heavy hand may be slapped. The money that will be wasted in legal battles should have been spent on the children. We should be working with the indigenous people, not trying to force our way onto them. This what the report recommended and this is just what Howard has ignored.
Howard's takeover must comply with Racial Discrimination Act
The Howard takeover of Aboriginal communities doesn't comply with the Racial Discrimination Act. What is good for one part of Australia should be good for all of Australia. The only way we can make Howard and his cronies treat the aboriginal population with the dignity they deserve is to make sure that the government henchmen cannot discriminate against aboriginals.
Brough justice
After watching that shameful minister on Lateline this week, I fervently hope you are right, Martin Gifford!
Let's pray two things.
That Labor can get up, and that it does do the job the Howardists have recklessly abdicated responsibility for, after they sought this out so earnestly, imploring of the Australian public the privilege of doing the job and purportedly in the public interest rather than their own.
Top Down Management
The Chief Minister wrote to the Prime Minister about aboriginal issues about a year ago offering a plan of action. However, it was ignored. Now we have the Federal Government moving in with no experience in dealing with social issues. There was no consultation with clinical staff before they took their action. They scared the communities they were suggesting they were trying to help; really starting from the back foot.
If there was a real humanitarian concern the Federal Government would have consulted widely and listened carefully with the people, leaders, and the NT administration.
The current ad hoc management style displayed by the Coalition make them a scary proposition for the next three years.
Attacking the States won't deliver victory to Howard
Will Howard's attack on the states and focussing on key electorates win him the election? I think it looks too transparent and desperate.
With interest rates back at 1996 levels, and the issues of Iraq, AWB, and IR not in the government's favour, and the security issue nullified, and Labor now with a credible leader, I think Howard cannot win.
The main scare campaign is that Howard never warned you about his radical IR changes last election, so if you vote for him this time you are giving him a mandate to do what he likes. And there's even the audiotape of Nick Minchen telling the chamber of commerce that even more IR changes are needed. And there are Costello's negative Howard quotes from the recent biography.
The Libs are going down this time.