Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent
header_02 home about login header_06
header_07
search_bar_left
date_box_left
date_box_right.jpg
search_bar_right
sidebar-top content-top

From Comrades to Consumers

Stephen GreenStephen Green is a Senior Economist at Standard Chartered Bank in Shanghai.

by Stephen Green

In the old days, when communist central planning suffocated China’s economy, fixed-asset investment was the regime’s measure of economic progress. The more tons of steel produced, slabs of concrete poured, and gallons of crude oil pumped out of the ground the better. The consumption-based economy, to which the capitalist West had apparently succumbed, was written off as a paper tiger.

On the surface, nothing much has changed. China remains obsessed with investing – construction of factories and infrastructure accounted for 41% of GDP and around half of economic growth in 2005. Moreover, the country’s continuing high levels of fixed-asset investment make sense – building roads, water pipes, metro systems, telecommunication networks, and electronics factories is what a vast and rapidly modernizing country must do.

But the Communist Party leadership has decided that in the next decade hairdressers, accountants, karaoke hostesses, tour guides, and movie directors will be the new pillars of economic performance. As investment growth slows and export markets endure their unpredictable business cycles and protectionist moods, China will increasingly rely upon consumption for creation of jobs and income – and the service industry is where most consumption occurs.

There is only one problem: Chinese people do not seem to want to consume, at least according to commonly cited data. National savings amounted to roughly 50% of GDP in 2005, which apparently means that households are so afraid of hospital bills, school fees, and the down-payment on the new apartment they dream of that they save every penny they earn.

But that savings number hides something very critical. Chinese households do save a lot, about one quarter of their income. But as Louis Kuijs of the World Bank has pointed out, what sets China apart from many other developing countries is not that households save uniquely high levels of their income, but that enterprises do. Indeed, private consumption in China has been growing in real terms at an annual rate of around 10% for the last seven years. This means that getting Chinese households to spend more is not a hopeless mission.

According to the credit card provider MasterCard, by 2010 China’s middle class will number 100 million, each with discretionary spending of $5,590, and 7.5 million affluent people, each with $13,500 to spend. But why wait until 2010? If a decent credit culture can be created, people can have access to tomorrow’s income today. People in their twenties could borrow money to buy a house, start a family, and go on holiday, paying the money back when they are in their fifties and would much rather stay at home and enjoy their grandchildren.

Consumer credit began in China only in the late 1990’s, with regulations allowing banks to offer mortgage loans, which now amount to about 10% of total loans. According to a recent survey by the People’s Bank (the central bank), households in the ten largest cities spend about 35% of their monthly income on average on mortgage repayments, which is comparable to other countries.

Loans for education and car purchases are now also possible, and 2% of households have credit cards, which is obviously still low compared to 75% in the United States, but there were no such households just five years ago. Although debit cards remain far more common, banks like China Merchants Bank have been aggressive in issuing real credit cards.

A key problem with the credit card rollout is that the payment system is not yet in place. UnionPay, the market leader, is expensive for retailers to install, and many shops prefer cash to avoid tax. However, outstanding credit on cards is growing, more than quadrupling year on year in 2004, to 0.18% of GDP, according to the consulting firm McKinsey.

Several other obstacles must nonetheless be surmounted in order to boost consumption. First, banks still have few reliable means of checking borrowers’ creditworthiness, including previous loans from other banks. Educational loans should be booming in urban and rural China, but banks do not know to whom to lend, so they are not.

Second, banks are vulnerable to non-repayment. The car loan market underwent a mini-boom in 2003-04, but non-repayment rates in excess of 50% forced banks to pull back. The difficulty of repossession (where did the borrower park the car?) and sale (the used-car market is still in its infancy) meant that most of these bad loans had to be written off.

There is also a dark cloud over the mortgage market following a judgment by the Supreme People’s Court in 2003 that banned the repossession of homes that are a primary residence. A recent revision of that decision permits banks to repossess homes, but only if they help arrange alternative lower-cost housing – an administrative nightmare for lenders, particularly if a lot of people start defaulting at the same time.

Third, consumers are generally not adept at dealing with interest-rate risk. Nearly all mortgages have floating rates that vary with the five-year loan rate set by the People’s Bank. However, late last year, Everbright Bank and some others began offering fixed-rate mortgages. Take-up has been slow, but the April 2006 surprise hike in bank rates may help to sow greater public awareness of interest-rate risk.

Finally, China needs a greater diversity of financial products. Until recently, banks could offer only simple savings accounts. But structured deposits – for example, deposits whose rate of return is linked to the performance of the New York Stock Exchange – are becoming increasingly popular. Securities investment funds now account for roughly 30% of tradable stock market capitalization, although this represents only 0.9% of GDP, compared to more than 5% in India.

The economic significance of new financial products is likely to grow more rapidly as foreign banks enter the market. If China’s regulators issue the right licenses, the financial sector will play a key role in nurturing and sustaining the consumer society of tomorrow.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2006.
www.project-syndicate.org

left
right
spacer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Paul Keating warned us - the Liberals say we a"Banana Republic".

At least the Liberal lie was not accepted by most Australians.  With all respect to the farmers who were devastated by Cyclone Larry - "Bananas" may well be the way the Liberal Party today runs their false economy, but it is not the cause of it.  All of a sudden Howard and Costello are blaming everything from fruit to petrol for their debt-ridden mess.  Since Howard's election promise of "low interest rates" in 2004, we have had another three rises and a total of five on his watch.  Could Labor have done better?  Could they have done worse, using the Liberal's excuses? The Howard hacks like selective  comparisons don't they?  How about the fact that Australia now has the HIGHEST interest rates in the western world?  Let's have a reality check on "we can't do anything about the cost of petrol at the bowsers" con and the "head down"act of concerns for Australians which Howard would have you believe.  Firstly, it was the Howard Liberal government who deregulated petrol prices at the bowsers.  IF the price of petrol is the major cause of the inflation we are now suffering and NOT the massive  personal and foreign debt, WHY doesn't the Howardistic Liberal government remove the excise to help ptotect the mortgage battlers that they have created?  Or, alternatively remove the 10% tax on tax?  Or both?  That would greatly assist the people who have been screwed by the credit card, easy loans and cashless economy.  BUT the Liberals would lose the 38c exercise per litre and the additional 10% on the current expected $1-50 per litre. That is a total of 52c per litre - reducing the current per litre of 98c even though Oil is over $US74 per barrrell. The cost to the Australian motorist going to work (if he has a job) is painful.  The Americans and, may I say, the Israelis, are creating a shortage of oil while they make Hitler look like a member of the Salvation Army .  NE OUBLIE.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
© 2006, Webdiary Pty Ltd
Disclaimer: This site is home to many debates, and the views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the site editors.
Contributors submit comments on their own responsibility: if you believe that a comment is incorrect or offensive in any way,
please submit a comment to that effect and we will make corrections or deletions as necessary.
Margo Kingston Photo © Elaine Campaner