| Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
A primer for pandemicsH T Goranson is the Lead Scientist of Sirius-Beta Corp and was a Senior Scientist with the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. For previous discussion of "Bird Flu" on Webdiary, see Craig Rowley's, Everybody's talking about the bird ... but it's a very human story.
by H T Goranson A few times each year, the world is reminded that a pandemic threat is immanent. In 2003, it was SARS. Today, it is a potential avian virus similar to the one that killed 30 million people after 1914. “Bird flu” has already shown that it can jump from fowl to humans, and now even to cats, which indicates that it might be the next global killer. But there are many other potential pandemics, and many are not even viruses. Bacteria, prions, parasites, and even environmental factors could suddenly change in a way that slays us. It is widely predicted that when this happens, the economic and human losses will exceed that of any previous war. Indeed, it is humbling to remember that some of history’s most deadly invasions were carried out by single-cell organisms, such as cholera, bubonic plague, and tuberculosis. Countries with the resources to do so are making resistance plans against pandemics – limited strategies that would protect their own citizens. Most governments are hoping that early detection will make containment possible. Containment depends heavily on vaccines, but vaccines are only part of the answer. While they are a good defense against many viruses, each vaccine is highly specific to the threat. Viruses are parasites to cells, and each virus attacks a particular type of cell. The virus is shaped so that it can drill into a particular feature of that cell and inject parts of itself inside, confusing the cell into making more viruses and destroying itself in the process. With their very specific forms, the most effective anti-viral vaccines must be designed for a narrow range of factors. Sometimes the tailored nature of viruses works in our favor. For example, they usually find it difficult to jump between species, because they would have to change their structure. But if large numbers of a host – say, birds – encounter a great number of people, eventually the virus will find a way to prosper in a new type of cell. Birds are the greatest concern today only because the spread is easy to see. But AIDS jumped from monkeys and several types of flu jumped from swine. Deadly mutations of any kind need to be identified urgently, so that an effective vaccine can be designed before the strain becomes comfortable in the human body. Unfortunately our present methods of detection are not sensitive enough. This is even more worrying when you realize that scientists should also be monitoring bacteria, prions, and parasites. There are more bacteria than any other life form. Many live harmlessly in our bodies and perform useful functions. They evolve and adapt easily, which means that they learn to sidestep our drugs over time. Bacteria should be checked for two types of mutation: adaptation by a hostile form that enables it to become super-immune to drugs, or a deadly mutant strain that appears in one of the multitude of “safe” bacteria. Prions are a relatively new discovery. They are made from proteins similar to those that the body uses during healthy operations, which means that they are able to fool the body’s tools into making more prions. They have only recently been recognized as the cause of several infectious diseases, including mad cow disease and Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, which kill by crowding out healthy brain cells. Many nerve, respiratory and muscle diseases might also be caused by prions. Finally, parasites, simple animals that infect us, are already classified as pandemics. Malaria afflicts 300 million people and is the world’s biggest killer of children. Many parasites are worms: hookworm (800 million people infected), roundworm (1.5 billion), schistosomes (200 million), and the worm that causes Elephantiasis (150 million). There are also antagonists that are currently ignored. Environmental chemicals and particulates might warrant their own categories. Or consider combinations of problems, such as these chemical infectors mixing with airborne pollens, and apparently pushing up incidences of asthma. New fungal infections are even scarier and might be harder to treat. The bottom line is that we can’t predict where the threat will emerge, so we need a distributed, intelligent detection system. In practical terms, how should it be built? “Detectors” would have to be expert enough to know when an ordinary-looking symptom is actually an emergency. They would be located everywhere, with an emphasis on vulnerable regions. Initial warning signs of a pandemic are most likely to appear in the developing world, but detection nodes should be positioned in every country, with the least possible expense. This is not as difficult as it sounds. The key is to harness existing infrastructure. Medical infrastructure exists everywhere, in some form. It also tends to be the least corrupt of institutions in regions where that is a problem. Medical centers and clinics would be expected to investigate the cause of ailments in a large number of their patients, even in cases where the symptoms seem common. A small amount of additional scientific expertise and lab equipment would need to be added to a public health system that serves ordinary needs. Enhancing existing resources would be effective for two reasons. First, illness is more likely to be reported in a city hospital than at a specialist institute. Second, the investment would boost latent public health in that region. For poor regions, investment in equipment and training would have to come from wealthier counterparts. Rich countries could justify the expense in terms of the savings that would result from early detection of a major threat. Tropical climates and urban slums are humanity’s front line against pandemics, and they should be equipped properly. Public health is an important asset for any nation. With so much at stake, it
makes sense to place sentinels near every swamp, city, public market, and
farmyard on earth. www.project-syndicate.org [ category: ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Tamiflu: the panacea for coming lawyers' bills
Oh, and why am I not surprised at how many Bush regime members have gained from the Tamiflu spending, despite resistance developing. Google a few names with the drug.
Amantadine is now no use, just like Vancomycin, our most precious anti- infective agents are thrown at animals.
Cheers
Bioweapons and the business imperative still rules this governme
There is already mandatory disease reporting of certain critical illnesses, and just last year smallpox was added. Duhhhhh! As if a GP or hospital wouldn't fall over themselves to contact the health department if someone had smallpox! Bit weird, considering it is eliminated worldwide. Obviously consideration is now of bioweaponry being used. A reality not spoken about openly.
As such the reporting falls down on some details. If it had had ethnic details included then SARS would have been noted earlier as of greater risk to Cantonese, as discovered later in Taiwan labs. The Canadian experience supports this.
Yet events occur and we gloss over them. Remember the nursing home that had about 10 dead in Newcastle – usually flu vaccination is well documented and pushed in such institutions. Why so virulent? Or were they not vaccinated and hence liability issues?
Craig Rowley’s articles earlier on Webdiary were very informative and kept us up to date on details about such. Can a link be kept at the side?
It is very concerning to hear the government at big business meetings reassuring that we won't have rapid airport closure should a pandemic break out. Why the f*** not? As an island we have a huge advantage in containment measures. Business suffers less in the long run if we don't lose our consumer population and working age persons. AIDS is a model to show how devastating that is for economies (business words for those illiterate in humanity terms like suffering prevention and human loss). Then again, multinationals may not care locally.
We are supposed to wear masks now if we have the "flu”. Sure, but after 40minutes of humidified breath are they still useful?
The West Nile virus was an interesting study in spread and containment when birds are the vector. Universal and impossible are the answers in the US. Interesting that Armitage is on record as blaming Cuba for bioterrorism during that US "plague". Nice to see some are consistent.
In my opinion, if one analyses a bioagent as a weapon the best vector to affect the maximum city population numbers would be pigeons, hence the concern at the recent AB positive pigeons found at the airport. I would be very concerned at that and would want to look carefully into it. As well as checking all pigeon flocks and race records of such, I would ban all imports of such during these times of alertness.
The episodes of air-conditioning mishaps are interesting. Can we trust our public health authorities to investigate such incidents carefully? Perhaps not as how many people had urine tests for residue during the last episodes?
Put yourself in the shoes of the ruthless. How do you test such devices? Yes – in war zones. The "red cloud" that killed so many in northern Africa from lung damage is suspicious. As is the recent Marburg virus experience in western Africa with the 100% mortality, quite a change and more like Ebola but less contagious, it seems.
Add to that the history of testing such devices upon populations, even with their permission, like the Seventh Day Adventists in the US, and upon the military like the UK soldiers. One should always be alert for patterns suggesting nefarious activity. How would you test the genetic selectivity of a pathogen if you were planning your arsenal? Hmm, how about a population where there is diversity, like here, NZ, US, and even the UK now?
Even naturally-occurring disease have ethnic variability in effectiveness, or we may have never noticed the protection that sickle cell trait has for malaria. Some diseases have no protection, like sleeping sickness, which until recently kept some areas of Africa relatively pristine of prolonged human activity.
My first point is that our government is gearing up to a biological threat reality by adding smallpox. My second point is that we may miss such an event if ethnic selectivity is not checked for in disease monitoring, as probably happened with SARS. It is possible that events of the testing nature are occurring but that would have to carefully studied. History suggests that, in time of threat, this is a not unlikely event. My third point is that while our government gives big business' interests priority over our people's safety and security we are at severe risk.
Cheers
PS. Enjoy your BBQ and wonder why the UK destroyed all those cattle for foot and mouth when there is medical treatment for such according to our local vets. Much perplexed. Does burning destroy prions?